It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Asking foreign assistance for help in a domestic election. It was made very clear that such behavior is against the law during the Russian debacle, so he can't feign ignorance with his Ukraine call, or with openly asking China for help investigating Biden out on the WH lawn.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
And if that's illegal, then the democrats are in trouble because the dossier is from a British national.
originally posted by: redmage
originally posted by: DBCowboy
And if that's illegal, then the democrats are in trouble because the dossier is from a British national.
I wish that were true, but the issue there is that the dossier was solicited by an American conservative think tank to beat Trump in the nomination process, and only later passed on to democrats by that American think tank, so unfortunately an illegal direct connection gets lost and diluted. The think tank wasn't running for office, and the dems were gifted it by American conservatives.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Hillary paid for it through her lawyers.
originally posted by: redmage
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Hillary paid for it through her lawyers.
She paid a conservative American PAC/think tank for the dossier that they tried to use against Trump in the Republican nomination process. She didn't solicit foreign nationals for it.
originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: DBCowboy
I'm not Nostradamus.
I can't see the future.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
So you don't see the democrats benefitting from eliminating Trump?
Or are you afraid to answer?
...or facts either.
originally posted by: redmage
a reply to: DBCowboy
I'm not Nostradamus.
I can't see the future.
Asking foreign assistance for help in a domestic election.
or with openly asking China for help investigating Biden out on the WH lawn.
originally posted by: butcherguy
What you are saying here is that if you are a candidate, you are free to break the law without worry of being investigated.
originally posted by: redmage
Moving the goalposts again.
Whistle blower testifies and it's all cries of "It's not first had knowledge so it means nothing!"
Decorated military officer with first hand knowledge comes forward and now it's cries of "It's just an opinion so it means nothing!"