It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Oraculi
a reply to: Metallicus
You know what the best thing about him is? If you ever manage to get close.
He has no sweat glands. So all of his heat dissipates through his scalp and his hair. But that's not it - the smell! The smell it gives off is just the most beautiful, wonderful, floral scent that comes out of his hair. Reminds me of jasmine.
He's just the best.
And totally stable.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: Metallicus
I love this POTUS. He is the exact kind of ‘dick’ we need to deal with the unhinged Left in this country. I am more concerned about 2024 than 2020. We will probably get another limp dick Republican loser to run against the Democrats communist du jour. It will be an awful choice.
Why am I not surprised the butt hole Republicans love 'dick'. Divided we fall. The Russians love what we are doing to ourselves.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
Trump has more to lose than most of us.
Are you literally dense, or are you just deliberately being obtuse?
We have millions, no actually we have billions of people out there that work there hands to the bone and struggle every single day, just to keep a roof over there heads... like seriously!
Mr silver spoon Trump has never done a hard days work in his life and will be just fine, no matter what anyone throws at him.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
Fact is, they were there and Trump most definitely gave Turkey the "green light" to invade, by standing down and retreating.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Freedom of the Press is a civil right guaranteed in Amendment I. President Trump is the head of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government. IF he chooses to answer questions from a member of the Press, and verbally assaults them in his response, there is a case to be made for a violation of Civil Rights.
Why should Mr. Trump do that? For mere satisfaction?
originally posted by: Liquesence
Seeking asylum is not against the law.
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: watchitburn
They were arrested for breaking the law. When you are under arrest your kids don't go with you.
Seeking asylum is not against the law.
You're still pedaling the separated families BS.
Peddling BS? Mirror, mirror.
Trump is a diamond in the rough. Obama polished Glass. Romney cotton candy. Warren just ridiculous and Biden not polished and not a diamond.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Edumakated
That's the most lucid and reasonable I've seen him in a long time.
Reminds me of the Trump I used to enjoy watching.
He remained calm and answered in a reasonable way IMO.
If he did that all the time with less twitter rants, he would truly be a force to be reckoned with.
It is hard to speak that way when you aren't a politician. I don't and never expected him to be an orator. He just says what he is thinking and like most entrepreneurs and other successful people who have to get sh*t done for a living, he doesn't care if it is grammatically correct or your feelings get hurt. Just freaking get it done.
originally posted by: StallionDuck
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Edumakated
That's the most lucid and reasonable I've seen him in a long time.
Reminds me of the Trump I used to enjoy watching.
He remained calm and answered in a reasonable way IMO.
If he did that all the time with less twitter rants, he would truly be a force to be reckoned with.
I don't want to go there, but I almost wonder if they've finally gotten his meds in order. I mean ... THAT is a different guy than I've seen in what, 5 or 6 years?
Who's to say that 'his' tweets don't do exactly what he wants them to do? Draw attention?
Maybe he's not even the one doing the tweets. lol Wouldn't that be hilarious? Maybe the Russians hacked his account? *shrugs* Could happen
originally posted by: richapau
a reply to: Edumakated
I can't wait for this pos loser jerk to get impeached and lose like a little whiny b in 2020.
www.lexico.com...
com·mand·er in chief /kəˈmandər in CHēf/ noun a head of state or officer in supreme command of a country's armed forces. an officer in charge of a major subdivision of a country's armed forces, or of its forces in a particular area.
.
s? Article II, Section 1, Clause 1, vests the entirety of the "executive Power" in a single person, the President of the United States. By contrast, under Article I Congress enjoys only those legislative powers "herein granted." Scholars generally agree that this vesting of executive power confers upon the President broad authority to engage in foreign relations, including war, except in those areas in which the Constitution places authority in Congress. The debate, then, is over the extent of Congress's constitutional authority to check the President in matters of war.
ential initiative in war established by these two provisions of Article II appears to be bolstered by other constitutional provisions. Article I, Section 10, Clause 3, expressly prohibits states from "engag[ing] in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger
as will not admit of delay" unless they have obtained the "Consent of Congress." By contrast, no such limitation on engagement in war by the President can be found in Article II. Although Article II expressly authorizes the President to engage in other foreign relations powers (such as the making of treaties and the appointment of ambassadors) only with the consent of Congress, it imposes no such check with respect to the use of military force. The lack of an express consent requirement for executive initiation of hostilities is particularly meaningful in light of
www.britannica.com...
Pravda, (Russian: “Truth”) newspaper that was the official organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1918 to 1991. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, numerous publications and Web sites continued under the Pravda name.
originally posted by: richapau
a reply to: Edumakated
I can't wait for this pos loser jerk to get impeached and lose like a little whiny b in 2020.
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
Trump has more to lose than most of us.
Are you literally dense, or are you just deliberately being obtuse?
We have millions, no actually we have billions of people out there that work there hands to the bone and struggle every single day, just to keep a roof over there heads... like seriously!
Mr silver spoon Trump has never done a hard days work in his life and will be just fine, no matter what anyone throws at him.
So I see. You have more to lose than Trump. If the system goes to hell you have more to lose than Trump?