It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At the time, 911 was considered by some to be a diversion from the very serious attention that the Disclosure Project press conference was getting...and then afterwards once all the dust had settled, Steven Greer went about inexplicably and systematically ruining his credibility and became a joke in the ufology community...whereas he had been taken quite seriously previous to 911. The massive amount of expert testimony that he presented had been considered to be credible as well... for those of you who had been following it at the time. It was quite a big deal back then.
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: The GUT
Very smart to be very suspicious ... people have died due to looking into whatever it is and I doubt they'll just divulge the whole enchilada because they found their inner Santa.
It seems that either someone died who was gate keeping, or something is going to happen that makes it impossible to suppress any longer...
I guess there's the ol' Operation Bluebeam totalitarian crack down agenda as a possible reason...
anything else?
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
So those 1500 rounds they fired at the ufo actually brought it down. Fascinating. Either "they" wanted us to recover "their" craft or our 1942 technology was sufficient to bring down a ufo. Which one, I wonder?
I don't suppose you're one of those "flat earthers"?
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
So those 1500 rounds they fired at the ufo actually brought it down. Fascinating. Either "they" wanted us to recover "their" craft or our 1942 technology was sufficient to bring down a ufo. Which one, I wonder?
Or that quote is not true.
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: vlawde
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: celltypespecific
Luis Elizondo recently mentioned that we are in possession of a crashed UAP,
About as plausible as Ron Wyatts claim to have found The Ark of the Covenant.
Did he actually flat out say that, or 'hinted' at it? If he flat out said it, where there any details?
Here you go.
However, one man claims to have not only found the Ark of the Covenant but to have seen it with his own eyes. Ron Wyatt says he found the Ten Commandments on January 6, 1982, an event he believes was foretold by prophecy
www.ancient-origins.net...
Well of course I could explain my point. Why do you ask?
originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: MissSmartypants
I'm not, and I don't see the relevance of your question. Could you explain your point?
Thanks in advance.
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
“Regarding the air raid over Los Angeles it was learned by Army G2 that Rear Admiral Anderson recovered an unidentified airplane off the coast of California with no bearing on conventional explanation. This Headquarters has come to the determination that the mystery airplanes are in fact not Earthly and, according to secret intelligence sources, they are in all probability of interplanetary origin.”
General George C. Marshall – US Army 1942
Anytime I see someone or something related to ufology that has been so insistently and consistently discredited I become suspicious. Why is it so important that we believe the information not to be true? We are being manipulated, you know. It could be the more strenuously something is debunked the more truth it contains.
originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
“Regarding the air raid over Los Angeles it was learned by Army G2 that Rear Admiral Anderson recovered an unidentified airplane off the coast of California with no bearing on conventional explanation. This Headquarters has come to the determination that the mystery airplanes are in fact not Earthly and, according to secret intelligence sources, they are in all probability of interplanetary origin.”
General George C. Marshall – US Army 1942
You're quoting from the Majestic 12 papers???
Dick Doty would be proud.
"The Dark Side of the Farce is wonderfully strong in this one."
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
Well of course I could explain my point. Why do you ask?
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
Over the years I have tried to read everything available about the Battle of L.A. (and anything else ufo related) but had never seen this information before. Is this something recently released?
So those 1500 rounds they fired at the ufo actually brought it down.
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
It could be the more strenuously something is debunked the more truth it contains.
Thank you. I would imagine that ufo technology has improved a bit since then. It was conjectured for a while back in the day that our radar could destabilize a low flying ufo causing it to crash.
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
Over the years I have tried to read everything available about the Battle of L.A. (and anything else ufo related) but had never seen this information before. Is this something recently released?
So those 1500 rounds they fired at the ufo actually brought it down.
That quote is from the documents Robert Woods has. Those have appeared on TV several times, the first time I saw his docs was on UFO Hunters.
Eyewitnesses claim they saw a formation of UFO's that night that were not airplanes or balloons. According to the docs Wood had in his possession, two UFO's were shot down that night. One came down in the ocean and the other came down in the San Bernardino Mountains.
Listen to this video from the 10:30 to 13:30 minute mark:
www.youtube.com...
www.amazon.com...
Oh...but I think you do.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
Well of course I could explain my point. Why do you ask?
Because I'm not understanding it.
The U.S. Army and a prominent UFO research group are teaming up to investigate mysterious technology, but won’t come out and say where the tech comes from.
UFO/UAP traditionally means anything we spot in the sky that's unusual. But here's the thing: Swamp gas and Venus sightings don't leave behind technology that's so advanced, it needs to be "characterized" by the federal government.
And it would seem they've made the windows on "their" UFOs opaque on the outside so we can't see in them anymore. Or done away with windows all together.
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
a reply to: MissSmartypants
They do not crash anymore so I guess they fixed their radar problem.
They have been in possession of crashed UFO's since maybe 41 or 42. Definitely since= 1947. So what makes this any different?