It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Charles wedding draws objections (from ATSNN)

page: 1

log in


posted on Mar, 7 2005 @ 04:12 AM
Prince Charles has had 9 official complaints against his upcoming marriage to Camilla Parker Bowles.
What the objections are towards the marriage is not yet known. Both Prince Charles and Camilla cannot get a marriage license until all the objections have been handled, and answered.
Nine people have submitted formal objections to the marriage of Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles.

The details have been sent to the office of the Registrar General who will decide whether they are valid

Ms Kelly said some of the objections were likely to stem from questions over the legality of a royal marrying in a civil ceremony.

"The big problem for the royals is if any of these people decides to take the matter further in the courts because that really could stir things up," said Ms Kelly, who pointed out that the wedding date is only a few weeks away.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.

While the objections are not known to the public, I think it may have something to do with a Royal marrying a non-Royal.
The Queen, will not even be going to the wedding, as well as The Duke of Edinburgh!

Related News Links:

[edit on 7-3-2005 by Shai_lene]

[edit on 7-3-2005 by Shai_lene]

posted on Mar, 7 2005 @ 12:17 PM
I don't know why they are bothering .... except perhaps to hide
the fact that Charles was using tax $$$ the Brits gave him
(he's a 'kept' man by them) on that bar hag Camella.
Other than to hide his money trail, I don't know why they'd
bother. Neither has respected wedding vows. Neither has
taken them seriously in the past. Neither has bothered
repenting of their adultry and the pain that it caused both
families. Neither has shown interest in 'blessing' their
adultry with marriage. So... why now?

posted on Mar, 8 2005 @ 03:51 PM
interesting-hadn't heard anything about this-thanks for sharing!


log in