Jim Jordan has some questions for Nancy Pelosi

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
They are in the death throes of trying to retain control of the House. In their hearts, they know they’ve blown the 2020 election for the White House and Senate. They’ve lost balance in SCOTUS. Their one, lone power instrument is the House. If they stir up enough noise they think they may keep the House.

I've been going back and forth...

I'm not sure which would give me more pleasure...

If the Dems lost the House in a huge way, maybe even to the point of the Rs getting a super majority,

or

the Dems lost the House by just one seat.

Can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth in the latter case?

So Hillary should be in jail for paying millions of dollars to Russian agents for dirt on Trump?

a reply to: Lumenari
Do you have a link to that? Because unless i wrong you often demand links to things anybody says anti trump?

So... do you have a link to Hillary paying millions of dollars to Russian agents for dirt on trump? Do you? lets see the link.... you speak more # than anybody on this site and the biggest hypocrite.

princess pochaontas is a liar

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
a reply to: Ahabstar

I’m pretty sure Jim is posting the questions as a Captain Obvious moment to most. There’s no “a ha” questions he’s asking. They do paint an easy to see picture of what Naughty Nancy & her Band from the Island of Misfit Dems are conspiring to do.

They are in the death throes of trying to retain control of the House. In their hearts, they know they’ve blown the 2020 election for the White House and Senate. They’ve lost balance in SCOTUS. Their one, lone power instrument is the House. If they stir up enough noise they think they may keep the House.

We shall see. What’s clear to me though is the Dems and MSM traded centuries of credibility in exchange for a Socialism platform and Fake News branding. All for the hate of one man who, at best, was only going to be a thorn for 8 years. 100+ years vs 8. Hardly the big picture strategy.

Now, after getting exposed for a coup attempt and a MSM branded as Fake News; these 2 partners in crime will suffer the pain of that trade for much more than 8 years.

This thing about "losing" 2 billion dollars of aid in a Ukrainian oligarch's bank. I don't think it's the only time something like that has ever happened.

The USA has been giving away billions upon billions of aid over the years to corrupt third world governments, where nobody would bat an eyelash, or be the least surprised, if the money were to accidentally turn up missing.

And this foreign aid tends to be given out by democrat leadership.


They're starting to see that if they leave Trump in office, this is going to blow open.

I wouldn't be surprised if a few players like George Soros commit suicide in the next year or two (and I believe it would really be an honest suicide, not staged. Wanting to avoid public humiliation and prison.)

originally posted by: 00018GE
Jim Jordan can read ANYTHING into the record on the house floor publicly including closed door transcripts.

Right. But nobody would see it.

Gone are the days that you go find a reporter when you want to give a statement.

Might as well lock yourself in a closet and talk to the wall. Just as many people would hear you.

originally posted by: tinner07

It isn't a word for word transcript because they didn't include the translaters in the transcript. Nice try... think harder.

a reply to: Lumenari
OK... but you said they had the entire transcript did you not?
yes or no?

They put out the English part of the conversation.

What part of the transcript that the American public will not understand in another language do you need?

Let's be honest... if the NSA released the entire recorded conversation verbatim, you and the left would still say it was edited or something because it does not fit your conformation bias.

There IS no proof that you will find acceptable because it does not fit your narrative.

The transcript is exactly that and is admissible in court as evidence.

You can't accept it.

I get that.

It still doesn't make it any less real, no matter how you hope it doesn't.

originally posted by: tinner07

It isn't a word for word transcript because they didn't include the translaters in the transcript.

a reply to: Lumenari

Your own words right? then why would you claim that the entire transcript was released when you know for a fact it was not?

I get it... you are a liar... nice try.

SoOo... to make you happy, they would need to also add to the transcript the Russian or Ukrainian portions. (Whichever was used... languages in the Ukraine are an odd subject all by itself.)

That is going to help you how, exactly?

You think I'm a liar.

I think what you think is never going to matter to anyone.

Ever.

So we'll call that even, I guess.

originally posted by: tinner07

So Hillary should be in jail for paying millions of dollars to Russian agents for dirt on Trump?

a reply to: Lumenari
Do you have a link to that? Because unless i wrong you often demand links to things anybody says anti trump?

So... do you have a link to Hillary paying millions of dollars to Russian agents for dirt on trump? Do you? lets see the link.... you speak more # than anybody on this site and the biggest hypocrite.

princess pochaontas is a liar

Easily enough... since you seem to not be able to use a search engine.

Leftist NYTimes article showing Clinton paid for the Dossier

There are a few hundred other links, Senate testimony, etc if you care to look them up... it's what is called common knowledge.

As far as this...

princess pochaontas is a liar

I won't even bother to report you for that.

Just leave it out there for everyone to see what you are.

A smatchet.

Not the knife.

a reply to: tinner07

And now that I've gotten through your crop-dusting of ignorant replies to me in this thread, would you care to address the OP?

Do you think it's OK for the Democrats in the House to hold an impeachment investigation without the full House?

Is it just fine with you that Republicans cannot even listen in on the closed door questioning and testimony?

A Republican was kicked out of a closed door meeting today.

If the situation was reversed...

A majority Republican House starts an impeachment inquiry on Obama, does not allow Democrats to participate in it, does not even allow them into closed door hearings, where the only information the public gets is leaked to Fox News.

Would you be peachy fine with that?

Are you sure it wasn't all in English? You know Zelensky speaks English right? Also, how are there not recordings. I mean its 2019. They were able to record phone calls in the 50s why cant we just record it?

Seems like a waste of tax payer dollars to have 4 or 5 people transcribing it.

originally posted by: Auth3nt1k
Are you sure it wasn't all in English? You know Zelensky speaks English right? Also, how are there not recordings. I mean its 2019. They were able to record phone calls in the 50s why cant we just record it?

Seems like a waste of tax payer dollars to have 4 or 5 people transcribing it.

There has been since the telephone was introduced to the White House as a diplomatic tool (the Red Phone) a team of transcribers that transcribe the President's calls to other heads of state.

They are privileged conversations that are passed on to other Presidents.

The reason that there is a team of 5-6 is that they transcribe the conversation and then afterwards discuss their transcription and then make a formal transcription based on the majorities understanding of it.

And I'll leave it at that.

I have a question.

How many candidates for the 2020 presidential nomination will abstain from a vote if it comes to the floor of the House or Senate in order to avoid the impropriety of their vote influencing the 2020 election?

originally posted by: Auth3nt1k
Are you sure it wasn't all in English? You know Zelensky speaks English right? Also, how are there not recordings. I mean its 2019. They were able to record phone calls in the 50s why cant we just record it?

Seems like a waste of tax payer dollars to have 4 or 5 people transcribing it.

No future president is going to have time to actually listen to hours and hours of recorded talking. They'd rather sit down at their computer, and do a quick text search to see if any relevant conversations come up.

But in order to do that, the conversation has to have been converted into text. Computers are getting better at automated transcription every day, but for something as important as a presidential phone call, a group of human transcription takers would probably be more reliable.


They're not doing this for posterity. They're doing it so they can remember what was said.

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: tinner07

And now that I've gotten through your crop-dusting of ignorant replies to me in this thread, would you care to address the OP?

Do you think it's OK for the Democrats in the House to hold an impeachment investigation without the full House?

Is it just fine with you that Republicans cannot even listen in on the closed door questioning and testimony?

A Republican was kicked out of a closed door meeting today.

If the situation was reversed...

A majority Republican House starts an impeachment inquiry on Obama, does not allow Democrats to participate in it, does not even allow them into closed door hearings, where the only information the public gets is leaked to Fox News.

Would you be peachy fine with that?

Sounds like they're doing it so they can stall.

As long as the legality of Trump's own actions are in question, it becomes difficult for investigations of criminal activity by the Biden's, Kerry's and others to move forward.

More time to shred documents.

And come up with a plausible excuse for Hunter to take a vacation in Brazil, or some other country that doesn't have extradition.

gymmy fades away again