Jim Jordan has some questions for Nancy Pelosi

a reply to: Lumenari

So they hired a foreign national (Christopher Steele, if you don't remember) who used his contacts in the Kremlin to "compose" the Dossier.

The DNC hired Steele, or was it the Clinton campaign? Or was it an American company which did so? Did the DNC or the Clinton campaign act on anything provided by GPS fusion?

And why didn't you address the DNC/Ukraine issue?

Which issue would that be?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lumenari

So they hired a foreign national (Christopher Steele, if you don't remember) who used his contacts in the Kremlin to "compose" the Dossier.

The DNC hired Steele, or was it the Clinton campaign? Or was it an American company which did so? Did the DNC or the Clinton campaign act on anything provided by GPS fusion?

And why didn't you address the DNC/Ukraine issue?

Which issue would that be?

Did Clinton and the DNC pay for the Steele Dossier?

Yes or no?

I'm going with yes, according to the information we have.

Did they act on the information?

LMFAO.

As for your second question, I was wondering why you didn't address the fact that the DNC used people in the Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Trump campaign in an effort (which they say they have proof that it worked) to influence the 2016 election.

Highly illegal, according to the Democrats and yourself.

So if it is so illegal, why is nobody in jail for it, but it is grounds for impeachment now?

I'm off to bed... look forward to your reply in the morning.

a reply to: Lumenari

Did Clinton and the DNC pay for the Steele Dossier?

I don't know. Can you show me a receipt?

As for your second question, I was wondering why you didn't address the fact that the DNC used people in the Ukraine to dig up dirt on the Trump campaign in an effort (which they say they have proof that it worked) to influence the 2016 election.

I'm not entirely clear on the facts of the situation that you describe. (What proof that something worked?) But it certainly sounds illegal as you present it. The DOJ should do something about that.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lumenari

You have never, at this point in your life, heard about the Steele Dossier?

Yes, yes I have. But I thought it was the Washington Free Beacon who first hired GPS fusion, an American firm as I recall.

I'd LOVE to hear your story about how you somehow missed all of this.

I didn't.

So, why have they not been locked up, or indicted? Highly illegal, right?

I think you know the answer to that, don’t you? When the people doing the locking are owned by the people needing to be locked up, it gets a bit complicated. It’s inconceivable that the FBI, CIA or DOJ could ever be partisan or biased, right? They’ve even told us as much and I’ve put my full trust in them that they would never deceive, lie or mislead me in any way.

a reply to: mtnshredder

Yes. I'm familiar with circular arguments.

They don't do much for me.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: mtnshredder

Yes. I'm familiar with circular arguments.

They don't do much for me.

Then don’t ask silly questions you already know the answer to.

a reply to: Phage

Receipt? No.

Recipe? Yes. First get a large pot and stirring stick...

a reply to: xuenchen

What about them. Are they championing anything relevant?

I hear vaping is bad for you. I reckon you know that already

a reply to: Phage

Cmon phage. You love circling.

Maybe not arguing. But definately circling.

a reply to: Lumenari

They are literally going to attempt to impeach him on 2 whistleblower complaints on... A phone call that he released the transcript of.

Has the entire transcript of the phone call been released or just the one that clearly states that it is not a word for word transcript of the phone call?

a reply to: xuenchen

But WhatAbout all the other assistant wrestling coaches and administrators "at the time" huh ? Hmmmm Jordan had no power there "at the time" did he 😃

Nice to see you making up excuses for him... He will be so proud of you....

What you are saying is that somebody has to be in power to bring up charges on somebody? and what about everybody else?

originally posted by: tinner07
a reply to: Lumenari

They are literally going to attempt to impeach him on 2 whistleblower complaints on... A phone call that he released the transcript of.

Has the entire transcript of the phone call been released or just the one that clearly states that it is not a word for word transcript of the phone call?

It isn't a word for word transcript because they didn't include the translaters in the transcript.

Nice try... think harder.

a reply to: tinner07

How do you know for sure he knew "at the time" ? 😃

You do realized that the Democrats DO have the FBI in their back pocket. Right?

a reply to: Waterglass
Can you prove that? or just talking # like the rest of you trump followers here?

It isn't a word for word transcript because they didn't include the translaters in the transcript. Nice try... think harder.

a reply to: Lumenari
OK... but you said they had the entire transcript did you not?
yes or no?

How do you know for sure he knew "at the time" ?

a reply to: xuenchen
I dont... just funny how you jump in projecting other people and covering for him.... I get it...it is your protect trump at all cost mandate....

It isn't a word for word transcript because they didn't include the translaters in the transcript.

a reply to: Lumenari

Your own words right? then why would you claim that the entire transcript was released when you know for a fact it was not?

I get it... you are a liar... nice try.

a reply to: tinner07

I can see it in the news media and newspapers on an ongoing business daily. I also don't follow Trump and actually voted for John Kerry back in the day.

So how about that Epstein thing? Sanitized.

a reply to: tinner07

I also was trained via the same Filed Manual that you use.

FM 3-05.301 Psychological Operations Process Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures Text

a reply to: jimmyx

Until the democrats have an actual candidate nominated, there is no, "election opponent."

Biden might be the front runner, but it is far from a foregone conclusion that he will be the nominee; that is unless the voters really don't have any say in the matter.










Oh, wait...