Did CNN Hire Andy McCabe Because His Indictment is Imminent -or- His Indictment is Not Happening.

August 27, 2019

From Donna Brazile, to Michael Avenatti, to James Clapper, CNN has a recent history of putting shady characters on their payroll as "expert contributors".

Last week, CNN hired Andrew McCabe. McCabe is the disgraced former Assistant FBI Director, under the Obama Administration. He reported directly to FBI Director James Comey.

In April of 2018, Andy McCabe was Fired/Terminated by his new boss, FBI Director Christopher Wray, for Lying Four Times to Federal Investigators, and for leaking sensitive information to The Press/Media.

The U.S. Inspector General recommended that Andy McCabe be INDICTED for his crimes. Now it appears that his indictment by the Department of Justice is imminent, which is why CNN hired him, according to this theory:

It is almost guaranteed Andrew McCabe and his lawyer Michael Bromwich are in daily conversations with their network of friends inside Lawfare.

This same ideological network has vast affiliates throughout media.

The pending indictment of Andrew McCabe would explain why CNN hired him.

Knowing the DOJ was likely to indict McCabe, CNN could help frame a narrative that serves both their interests. That narrative was already in the New York Times article describing the potential for the indictment.

When McCabe is charged, the media narrative will be it’s because he took the job with CNN… Trump/Barr weaponizing the DOJ and trying to kill free speech, etc..

CNN doesn’t have to defend their action in hiring a known liar. They’ll instead frame McCabe as a victim.. a fellow traveler to the larger cause of justice – whose indictment is evidence of how far Trump and Barr will go to destroy their enemies.

Much More at: theconservativetreehouse.com...

There are also those who believe that CNN hired McCabe NOW, because he's been assured by A.G. William Barr's office that, like his former boss James Comey, he will NOT be indicted....even though the Inspector General recommended formal criminal charges.

For those of you who care, what are your thoughts?

-CareWeMust

a reply to: carewemust

No...its because working for CNN requires skill in dishonesty and those that demonstrate good ability are comodities for them. They excel at the core part of the job they need them to do.

If CNN did know , they hired McCabe to spread as much crap as he possibly could until that day comes .
So far Andy is living up to their standards.

Indicted or not, McCabe can't hide from ...

💥The💥Sun💥Burn💥

He's exposed so bad he will never live it down 💫💫😃💫💫

But CNN will let him lie over and over to cover himself and create deflections and red herrings

a reply to: carewemust

Could be either from a marketing standpoint.. he will sell for as long as he is 5 min famous regardless..


That said he will not be indicted..

Comey, the Clintons, Obama not anyone else trump has accused of felonies will be held accountable one little bitty bit..


Not only that but trump will suspiciously never release proof of his allegations either...



And his supporters will not blame him for it.. they will still kiss his butt and lap up his garbage and ask for more..

a reply to: xuenchen

BWAHAHAHA


You mean McCabe will never live it down as he spends his days playing golf at the country club and living life like a fat rat...


If McCabe isn’t held accountable he only profited off this..

a reply to: Gothmog

Either way McCabe is marketable..

Either people hoping he helps take trump down or those who hate him.. either way people will watch..




So what does it mean if McCabe is never held accountable??


If trump owns ever branch of federal law enforcement and yet trumpneither proves his case against McCabe not does he prosecute him..

So at that point McCabe has only profited off all of this??

a reply to: carewemust

The left is HELL BENT on losing the election

a reply to: JustJohnny

McCabe done got caught lying under oath 😃

He's a flip-flopper recuser too 😃

And he dips bananas in coffee 😃😃

a reply to: JustJohnny

Three rapid-fire posts in a row... triggered a little bit?

Comey, the Clintons, Obama not anyone else trump has accused of felonies will be held accountable one little bitty bit..

Let's see where we are after the current investigations are finished up before rushing to judgement on that one, shall we?

What I always wonder is why the left has no problem rooting for people who have committed actual crimes as long as they are also supporting the left's cause.

By any means necessary, I suppose.

Either way, I think it's going to be a REALLY long next 5 years for you.

a reply to: xuenchen

Tom Fitton said ( paraphrased a little ) “ Andrew McCabe lied four times “

Talk about an understatement.


That’s like saying Joy Behar has been slightly irritated for the last three years .


For christ sake he’s a lawyer !

originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: Gothmog

Either way McCabe is marketable..

Either people hoping he helps take trump down or those who hate him.. either way people will watch..




So what does it mean if McCabe is never held accountable??


If trump owns ever branch of federal law enforcement and yet trumpneither proves his case against McCabe not does he prosecute him..

So at that point McCabe has only profited off all of this??

That is where you just failed US Civics 101
Research BEFORE you post.

a reply to: JustJohnny

“Hoping he helps take Trump down”????????

What?!?!?!?

Why would President Trump need to be ‘taken down’?

He’s not some criminal. By ANYONES definition.

Oh did you mean “help to ensure a dEmocrat victory next year”?

That’s not gonna happen. They may come in third place, if they’re lucky. But I seriously doubt it.

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: carewemust

No...its because working for CNN requires skill in dishonesty and those that demonstrate good ability are comodities for them. They excel at the core part of the job they need them to do.

Then CNN needs to hire NADLER and PELOSI too. Discovered today that they are HUGE LIARS. They began an official Impeachment Inquiry into President Trump, even before Bob Mueller submitted his report!

Lying Azzholes: www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: Gothmog
If CNN did know , they hired McCabe to spread as much crap as he possibly could until that day comes .
So far Andy is living up to their standards.

CNN got mad at former DNI James Clapper when he said, "Obama personally ordered the surveillance of Trump". He was put on ice for a few months after that.

a reply to: xuenchen

Wasn't it McCabe who got $700,000 in GoFundMe donations and wrote a profitable book, since being fired from the FBI?

originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: carewemust

And his supporters will not blame him for it.. they will still kiss his butt and lap up his garbage and ask for more..

Wrong there buddy! Trump had better not let the DOJ have one rule for high-level crooks in government, and one for everyone else. We're getting close to the moment of truth.

a reply to: carewemust

Most rational answer is that they have no idea if he will be indicted or not.

But if they did I'm sure they wouldn't be foolish enough to hire someone that they knew was going to be arrested.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

Wasn't it McCabe who got $700,000 in GoFundMe donations and wrote a profitable book, since being fired from the FBI?

Yup, and there was some odd things going on too ... 🤣

Andrew McCabe’s GoFundMe Campaign Was Put Together by K Street PR Firm

Andrew McCabe recently raised over half a million dollars from small donors by way of crowdfunding platform GoFundMe. McCabe’s cash-collecting prowess was buoyed by several #Resistance-linked personalities and MSNBC’s own Rachel Maddow, who suggested McCabe should run for office because he’s so good at raising money.

Was this apparent “grassroots effort” actually a PR campaign put together by high-priced, well-connected, and experienced PR professionals in order to take advantage of the #Resistance’s seething anger at the Trump administration? A Monday report in Slate suggested as much. Law&Crime can now confirm that some of those allegations are true, while some of them appear to oversell the issues at hand.