Remember the 30,000 bleachbite emails of Clintons.. Well they got them now

a reply to: Extorris

Just out of curiosity... does a non-government employee sending state department emails to a gmail account, strike you as legit ?

a reply to: CrawlingChaos

Only if they are Democrats, Republicans are subject to all laws of the USA, the Dems, not so much.

a reply to: CrawlingChaos

Unlikely to show face again in this thread as "weren't under subpoena" claim was shredded in a NY minute.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: projectvxn
anyone can argue that Hillary didnt break the law./

She would be locked up now if she did.

Where ya been dude?

let me help you out here:



Remember, anyone but Hillary would be prosecuted.

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: willzilla

bleach bit is a free downloadable program to compress files and free up disc space.

www.bleachbit.org...


What magic powers are this crowd giving the software?

The magical power that using it on subpoenaed evidence is a crime

The emails it was used on were not Subpoenaed evidence.

Yes it was

All of your long winded explanation does not change that

If the fbi subpoenaed emails from me, then I delete them and say it’s cool cause none of them were relevant, I would go to jail

Your story also conveniently leaves out the man from Platte river paul Combetta going on Reddit and asking how to get a very vips name off of an email chain the day before he bleach bitted them

You also leave out comey admitted he thought Cheryl mills was the person who instructed Paul Combetta to do this

But I guess ifi was ignoring or excusing these crimes i would leave that part out as well

a reply to: Grambler

Bro, slow down on your typing and proofread a bit. I'm not trying to be a dick, but I'm struggling to get your meaning with so many typos.

This story is comical. No IT guy with any credibility is going to 'copy' emails and send them to another account. If you want to look at gmail it is in the google cloud. If it was Outlook there are ost and pst files to find but if you want to look at a gmail account...just log in somewhere else. It is not done this way. I would think this was an insurance package he created so he does not get Epstiened. He forwarded all of her emails, and if that is true, he is also sending classified information that is not even his and should be arrested.

Weiner and Huma are very integral parts in all of this also.

The issue is finding the right people to bring these charges up.

Epstein was a warning to ALL those who have been a part resistTrump since 2015. No matter who you are and who protects you if you talk you will be silenced.

It is not just the Clintons folks. It is Obama. It is all of his intel and high level cabinet appointees. AG's. SecState. They are ALL complicit in what they tried to do. There are 'little' crimes that keep popping up but it is not about that.

When you want the top, you trickle info to scare the lower levels to get to them. That I feel is happening now.

originally posted by: redwilldanaher
a reply to: Extorris

Maybe you missed this from the Washington comPost when they fact checked it:

"On March 4, 2015, the Benghazi Committee issued a subpoena requiring Clinton to turn over her emails relating to Libya. Three weeks later, between March 25 and March 31, the employee had an “oh s—” moment and realized he did not delete the emails that Mills requested in December 2014, he told the FBI. The employee then deleted the emails and used a program called BleachBit to delete the files."

Stings like a_____ doesn't it?

That is what I outlined in my post.

The IT Tech at Platt River Networks was told in 2014 by his boss to change the retention policy on the server to 60 days.
He failed to do that. Once the emails were about to be scrutinized in response to the Subpoena request, he realized he had failed to do as he was told over a year ago and went about clumsily trying to delete emails older than 60 days so that his mistake would not be realized.

There is no evidence that any of the personal emails that were deleted were subject to the Subpoena.

Subpoena's are required to have scope. No one is required to turn over every email or document they ever produced.

The scope of the Subpoena from the Senate Select Committee was for any emails regarding Benghazi.

a reply to: projectvxn

That is so funny, so it's now spelling that throws you off?

How do you survive day to day? you must not read much.

if you have trouble understanding, that is on you.

Maybe it's your lack of comprehension and not Gramblers spelling?

I have no problem reading what he writes and making sense of it.

Maybe you lack something?

(flame away)

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: willzilla

bleach bit is a free downloadable program to compress files and free up disc space.

www.bleachbit.org...


What magic powers are this crowd giving the software?

The magical power that using it on subpoenaed evidence is a crime

The emails it was used on were not Subpoenaed evidence.

Yes it was

All of your long winded explanation does not change that

If the fbi subpoenaed emails from me, then I delete them and say it’s cool cause none of them were relevant, I would go to jail

No you would not.

That is why the FBI would raid and seize if they were concerned with evidence being destroyed.

If they serve you a Subpoena asking for any emails regarding a ponzi scheme you were involved in, you can not be prosecuted for deleting emails about your child's birthday party.

If they want to make the decision on relevance themselves, they raid the premises and seize evidence.

You seem to be inventing laws that don't exist.

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: Extorris

Just out of curiosity... does a non-government employee sending state department emails to a gmail account, strike you as legit ?

I would need to know the facts absent spin.

What does "legit" mean? Illegal or suspect?

What does "State Department Emails" mean?

If you are being liberal with definitions for the convenience of condemnation then there are likely several dozen Trump advisers and campaign associates that stay in regular contact with the administration on strategic issues that should be immediately investigated.

a reply to: Extorris

the "scope" you are talking about would be "computer X harddrive. not whats on the hard drive. the persson being investigated does NOT get to tell law enforcement what they can and cannot subpena. the Only what for it to be just "bengazi" email would be if they already knew how many there were.

they emails were subpened, they just didn't get them.

if you tried to do what the DNC and clintons did, guess where you would be.

(the Whitehouse is the wrong answer)

a reply to: Extorris

but but but but 🥝🥥


FBI recovers 30 deleted Clinton emails involving Benghazi attack


all her emails at the state department website

originally posted by: redwilldanaher
a reply to: CrawlingChaos

Unlikely to show face again in this thread as "weren't under subpoena" claim was shredded in a NY minute.

How so?

I stated logic and facts.

You responded with "Socialist scum".

Then you responded with repeating a fact I already stated.

I will be waiting for you to provide evidence that any of the emails that were deleted were responsive to the scope of the Subpoena, specifically any emails regarding Benghazi.

a reply to: Extorris

We already know some of the evidence Hillary’s team deleted were work related, some even being classified to some level

If the fbi or Congress subpoenaed trump connected people’s communications about the trump tower deal in Moscow, and then those trump connected people deleted all of their emails and said none was about the trump deal, then we found out some were, they would be arrested

If trump connected people lied to the fbi like Combetta did, they would be arrested

And again, if these were all just harmless emails about birthday parties, why was Combetta on Reddit the night before he bleach bitted them asking how to take a very vip’s name off of emails?

The story is very simple

Congress subpoenaed emails, Hillary’s team deleted them

That’s a crime

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Extorris

but but but but 🥝🥥


FBI recovers 30 deleted Clinton emails involving Benghazi attack


all her emails at the state department website

That article is from 2016.

and states this

"At this time, we have not confirmed that the documents are, in fact, responsive, or whether they are duplicates of materials already provided to the Department by former Secretary Clinton in December 2014.”

Why not post the follow up from the same news outlet?

Nearly all new Clinton emails were duplicates: report

he new email review also did not change the total number of classified documents that were discovered on the server.

thehill.com...

None of the new emails were classified.
Virtually all of them had been already turned over for the Subpoena and the ones that weren't didn't qualify aka "responsive" to the Subpoena.

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Extorris

If the fbi or Congress subpoenaed trump connected people’s communications about the trump tower deal in Moscow, and then those trump connected people deleted all of their emails and said none was about the trump deal, then we found out some were, they would be arrested

"and then we found out some were"?

False.

You are conflating "work related" with "Benghazi".

There has been no evidence that any of the emails deleted were related to Benghazi and that is what the Subpoena was for, emails related to Benghazi.

If trump connected people lied to the fbi like Combetta did, they would be arrested

Donald Trump Jr. and other Trump associates that testified to congress have not been arrested.

As far as Combetta, he traded immunity for his testimony.

No such deal was given to those associated with Trump that lied to congress and remain free.

a reply to: Extorris

Even comey admitted to finding work related emails that were deleted or not turned over by Hillary’s team

So the duplicate emails found afterwards is irrelevant seeing as we know from comeys own statement they deleted work related emails

a reply to: Extorris

Yes we know

The fbi went with the bold strategy of giving everyone around Hillary immunity for some reason

As far as Benghazi emails specifically

So you will concede if even in email that Combetta bleach bitted mentions Benghazi then he should be in prison?

Aside from that, no one else would get the benefit of the doubt of being allowed to chose which subpoenaed evidence investigators were allowed to look at even AFTER it was shown they failed to provide all evidence requested in the past

And if they deleted these emails after they were on Reddit the night before asking how to remove a very vips name from emails, they certainly would be charged with obstruction

But you are right, instead the trump hating people on the fbi gave Combetta and others that lied to the fbi such as mills and Abedin immunity

originally posted by: thedigirati
a reply to: Extorris

the "scope" you are talking about would be "computer X harddrive. not whats on the hard drive. the persson being investigated does NOT get to tell law enforcement what they can and cannot subpoena.

Incorrect.
Of course the subject cannot tell law enforcement the scope of a subpoena, but courts will not enforce subpoena's that are overly broad in scope.

In this instance the Select Committee on Benghazi issued a subpoena for Benghazi-related emails.

That is the fact of the matter, not a debate.

LINK ACTUAL SCOPE OF SUBPOENA



I won't hold my breath for anyone here to admit they were incorrect.