It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the beginning of the Trump administration, the Times geared up to cover the Russia affair, Baquet explained. “Chapter 1 of the story of Donald Trump, not only for our newsroom but, frankly, for our readers, was: Did Donald Trump have untoward relationships with the Russians, and was there obstruction of justice? That was a really hard story, by the way, let’s not forget that. We set ourselves up to cover that story. I’m going to say it. We won two Pulitzer Prizes covering that story. And I think we covered that story better than anybody else.”
But then came the Mueller report, with special counsel Robert Mueller failing to establish that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with Russia to fix the 2016 election. “The day Bob Mueller walked off that witness stand, two things happened,” Baquet continued. “Our readers who want Donald Trump to go away suddenly thought, ‘Holy #, Bob Mueller is not going to do it.’ And Donald Trump got a little emboldened politically, I think. Because, you know, for obvious reasons. And I think that the story changed. A lot of the stuff we’re talking about started to emerge like six or seven weeks ago. We’re a little tiny bit flat-footed. I mean, that’s what happens when a story looks a certain way for two years. Right?”
Baquet used the gentlest terms possible — “the story changed” — but the fact is, the conspiracy-coordination allegation the Times had devoted itself to pursuing turned out to be false. Beyond that, Democrats on Capitol Hill struggled to press an obstruction case against the president. The Trump-Russia hole came up dry.
Now, Baquet continued, “I think that we’ve got to change.” The Times must “write more deeply about the country, race, and other divisions.”
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: madmac5150
Liberals and the Mainstream Media truly believe the general public (Dems/Indies/Repubs) are too stupid to think for ourselves. Even after they are revealed as outright lying about a subject, they change to a different subject and lie some more.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
And furthermore....
Those persons who pushed that narrative on here need to own up, step forward and admit to being gullible, foolish, and silly. We need an apology for the insults lobbed at us non stop for many months , I guess we will see who has the guts to do so.
I applaud one of the ATS moderators who stepped forward already and had a change of heart. It takes strength and intelligence to do such a thing
www.globalresearch.ca...
One of the lesser-known provisions that have snuck their way into the NDAA over the years was a small piece of legislation tacked onto the NDAA for fiscal year 2013, signed into law in that same year by then-President Barack Obama. Named “The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012,” it completely lifted the long-existing ban on the domestic dissemination of U.S. government-produced propaganda.
originally posted by: madmac5150
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: madmac5150
Liberals and the Mainstream Media truly believe the general public (Dems/Indies/Repubs) are too stupid to think for ourselves. Even after they are revealed as outright lying about a subject, they change to a different subject and lie some more.
A serial killer, doesn't leave the comfort of "the tried and true"... all sociopaths tend to think alike.
originally posted by: ChefFox
a reply to: carewemust
I think you meant to say that in General MSM thinks that the public are to stupid to think for themselves?
originally posted by: ChefFox
a reply to: carewemust
I think you meant to say that in General MSM thinks that the public are to stupid to think for themselves?
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: ChefFox
a reply to: carewemust
I think you meant to say that in General MSM thinks that the public are to stupid to think for themselves?
Many of the local newspapers, TV and radio stations are on the level. But 90% of the Mainstream Media is owned by just 6 holding companies. Those holding companies put out "talking points" that 90% of U.S. news outlets spew to the public. I'm sure you've seen the video examples?
This is a phenomenal example, of the leftist press at work...
originally posted by: visitedbythem
Well, the bottom line is,
WE WON!
And we will keep on winning too
Congratulations to those of you that have minds capable of reasoning out just what the truth was!
A pat on the back for each of you
They are pushing an agenda of division, racial or otherwise, to inflame or enrage. The liberal media thrives on chaos; the more, the merrier. They not only get their coveted ratings, they use this chaos to push radical, leftist socialism. This is their game.