It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: loam
So, killing him would be kind of pointless?
Ain't seen you around since Clinton stopped needing to be defended....
originally posted by: FieldMarshalMatt
a reply to: loam
Goodness me
where'd you get that ?
Contained within the nearly 2,000 pages of documents are allegations from Epstein’s alleged “sex slave,” Virginia Roberts Giuffre, regarding the powerful men whom she’d been forced to have sex with, along with the powerful men whom she’d sometimes seen in Epstein’s presence. Included among the latter set of men is former President Bill Clinton.
... Within the deposition, she describes being flown “to the Caribbean” when she was 17 and then tagging along as Maxwell took “a huge black helicopter” to pick up Clinton. “Epstein did invite two young brunettes to a dinner which he gave on his Caribbean island for Mr. Clinton shortly after he left office,” it reads. “I’d have been about 17 at the time. I flew to the Caribbean with Jeffrey and then Ghislaine Maxwell went to pick up Bill in a huge black helicopter that Jeffrey had bought her.”
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: KansasGirl
None at all. I was joining in the discussion, if you hadn't noticed. My point was, that with this mountain of evidence, it would seem that killing Epstein would be an exercise in futility. On the other hand, it can be seen as an indication that he had no defense, that he would be spending the rest of his life in prison as a pedophile. I hear that is not a good situation to be in.
I do think that the rampant speculation is absurd, if expected and par.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: KansasGirl
See the post above yours.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: KansasGirl
See the post above yours.