Victoria's Secret Hire Its First Transgender Model

a reply to: Nyiah

Still sounded kinda stupid.

Go watch MMA Fallon fox.

I mean really it sounds like an idiot who thinks they just came up with the perfect solution.

Lol real talk.

I am guessing everyone will switch to your method since it's flawless.

Right?


🤔

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: Nyiah

Still sounded kinda stupid.

Go watch MMA Fallon fox.

And that's just your opinion. Would it bother you to know I support dropping women-specific physical minimums in the military? Ladies, if you can't keep up with the boys, you don't need special requirements to get in to begin with. Either condition yourself harder, or know when to fold em. We're a little too soft on the physical minimums, both militarily and in sports.

JMO.

a reply to: Nyiah

That's great but not what we were talking about but I agree with you on that.

Us women soccer team vs 15 yr old boys lol

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: Nyiah

That's great but not what we were talking about but I agree with you on that.

Us women soccer team vs 15 yr old boys lol

Ok, so what ARE we talking about? Because I could have sworn it was about crossing difficult physical thresholds.

If you're equating women's soccer with being tantamount to teen leagues, well...I think that makes my point pretty clearly for me there. If you're a pro female athlete and not better than a teenage kid, then you're NOT really pro at all.

a reply to: jrod

Fine by me.

a reply to: AnakinWayneII

I would say great to see. Does not matter how people are at-least she is promoting good health with a health figure, rather than this new obsession with posting obese people in magazines and telling kids its ok. Thats concerning.

a reply to: Nyiah

that doesn't make any sense because all that would happen is women being excluded, segregating genders is necessary for fairness in sports, without it one group would just suffer exclusion for no reason.

originally posted by: BlackProject
a reply to: AnakinWayneII

I would say great to see. Does not matter how people are at-least she is promoting good health with a health figure, rather than this new obsession with posting obese people in magazines and telling kids its ok. Thats concerning.

That's all well and good but I disagree with your use of the pronoun.

You should probably refer to him as "he".

I am a scientist. I get irritated by these sort of things.

a reply to: AnakinWayneII

She's beautiful.

If she sells more underwear who really cares?
Its not like you're going to bed any of them. lol

a reply to: Nyiah

Wow how did this thread go from the pages of an underwear catalog to the battle front? In just what four or five pages?

a reply to: Nyiah

Nobody is interested in watching females compete not even other females.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AnakinWayneII

She's beautiful.

If she sells more underwear who really cares?
Its not like you're going to bed any of them. lol

You mean "he"

Your use of the incorrect pronoun means you have implicitly accepted something unscientific.

I am a scientist. I take issues with things like this.

Like transracialism. I take issue with that too.

a reply to: AnakinWayneII

You're a weird scientist if threads about Victoria Secret models belong to your field of study.

Peace

a reply to: AnakinWayneII

Meh, just "normalizing" the trannies. The soft-in-the-head youth will never know the difference.

originally posted by: Gargoyle91
a reply to: AnakinWayneII

I feel awkward lol

First thing I thought of when I saw this thread

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: AnakinWayneII

Meh, just "normalizing" the trannies. The soft-in-the-head youth will never know the difference.

Precisely. Normalisation of something unscientific.

Imagine teaching biology to kids at school - genetics, chromosomes etc etc and then the media pushing transgenderism and transracialism? You'd have some very, very confused kids...

a reply to: AnakinWayneII

Your use of the incorrect pronoun means you have implicitly accepted something unscientific.

Science has nothing to do with Political Correctness except where the science is "Political Science" like the science behind global warming.

While she may be a he scientifically, (biologically), it is PC to refer to her as "She" and you dont get to decide otherwise because it is decided by those who occupy the moral high ground.

a reply to: AnakinWayneII

You'd have some very, very confused kids...

Thats precisely the point. Those confused are the easiest to re-orient to the proper PC attitude.