It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And here is the UNAVCO seismogram of Ridgecrest CA 07/06/2019 at 03:19 (7.0 EQ at 8 km deep),
Yes, there was an earthquake.
But something strange happened at NAWS China Lake/Ridgecrest, and those temblors continue to be felt today.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1
And here is the UNAVCO seismogram of Ridgecrest CA 07/06/2019 at 03:19 (7.0 EQ at 8 km deep),
That is not a seismograph recording, it is strain gauge recording. Says so right there. You can't really compare the two.
Yes, there was an earthquake.
But something strange happened at NAWS China Lake/Ridgecrest, and those temblors continue to be felt today.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1
And here is the UNAVCO seismogram of Ridgecrest CA 07/06/2019 at 03:19 (7.0 EQ at 8 km deep),
That is not a seismograph recording, it is strain gauge recording. Says so right there. You can't really compare the two.
Yes, there was an earthquake.
But something strange happened at NAWS China Lake/Ridgecrest, and those temblors continue to be felt today.
When it comes to measuring some aspects of earth movement, yes, indeed. Especially very low frequency events.
Yes, you are correct. A strain meter is MUCH more accurate than a seismograph!
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Violater1
No, it's different equipment to take different readings. The seismographs of the earthquake show normal buildup prior to the quake. This was a normal earthquake.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1
When it comes to measuring some aspects of earth movement, yes, indeed. Especially very low frequency events.
Yes, you are correct. A strain meter is MUCH more accurate than a seismograph!
But you can't compare the recording to that of a seismograph. Now, if you had strain gauge recordings of the Korea blast, you might have something. Or perhaps you might compare the strain gauge readouts to those of other, normal, quakes.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1
This is your comment, please back it up with a link or photo with link. You know, like I have.
Back up what? A suggestion that you compare apples to apples?
Your just being silly Phage. You said,"Now, if you had strain gauge recordings of the Korea blast..."
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Violater1
Your just being silly Phage. You said,"Now, if you had strain gauge recordings of the Korea blast..."
Yes, I said "if you had..."
It's your thread, find some apples to compare to support your speculation instead of apples and oranges.