It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I read everything I post as evidence neighbour.
originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
It’s cute how you refuse to acknowledge that you made a claim that can’t be substantiated and all you did was copy and paste someone else’s words without proper attribution so not only are you a liar, but you’re a thief as well when you steal intellectual property. You can cast all the smoke screens you want... you’re initial claim was wrong and either it was plagiarized or you straight up lied just to foolishly add weight to your already sinking ship. Which is it?
the only stupid argument was when you claimed that they haven’t changed in 400 Ma
Taxonomy - the organizing of creatures into groups - is a human-made system that is based off speculation with a touch of homology. Remember, the entire field of taxonomy assumes evolution is true, and works backwards from there. It is backwards science.
Genesis 2:19 (NIV): Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20 So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals.
Genesis 2:19 (KJV): And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
Genesis 2:19 (ESV): Now out of the ground the Lord God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.
Genesis 2:19 (USCCB ):So the LORD God formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds of the air, and he brought them to the man to see what he would call them; whatever the man called each living creature was then its name.
I'll ask it in your taxonomical language... did it change into something outside of the Coelecanth order? No. So it's still a coelecanth. The same coelecanth that was thought to be extinct for millions of years until it was found alive. Evolution just makes it up as they go along, always assuming it must be true, and never considering the implications of empirical findings.
all you did was copy and paste someone else’s words without proper attribution so not only are you a liar, but you’re a thief as well when you steal intellectual property.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: peter vlar
all you did was copy and paste someone else’s words without proper attribution so not only are you a liar, but you’re a thief as well when you steal intellectual property.
Mother f
Nope the OP was all me, I just looked up a bit of history on the two animals which I already new about anyways just a refresher for a new thread. I forget who mentioned the other fish earlier in the thread it had already come up anyways.
You evolutionists are all the
as soon as you lose the argument you slander the poster, it's been in done in virtually every thread in the origins forum.
Tired of the hamster wheel of stupidity this last month from you guys, we aren't getting anywhere, I just won't respond to insults moving forward....have fun but be careful you don't go to far, I know how to use the ALERT button.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Quadrivium
I am constantly posting about my faith. Because your little g roup of friends, are constantly calling my religion science.
Not to mention the little conversation you have else where (loose lips sink ships after all)
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
It’s cute how you refuse to acknowledge that you made a claim that can’t be substantiated and all you did was copy and paste someone else’s words without proper attribution so not only are you a liar, but you’re a thief as well when you steal intellectual property. You can cast all the smoke screens you want... you’re initial claim was wrong and either it was plagiarized or you straight up lied just to foolishly add weight to your already sinking ship. Which is it?
Taxonomy - the organizing of creatures into groups - is a human-made system that is based off speculation with a touch of homology.
Remember, the entire field of taxonomy assumes evolution is true, and works backwards from there. It is backwards science.
I'll ask it in your taxonomical language... did it change into something outside of the Coelecanth order? No.
So it's still a coelecanth. The same coelecanth that was thought to be extinct for millions of years until it was found alive.
Evolution just makes it up as they go along, always assuming it must be true, and never considering the implications of empirical findings.
originally posted by: peter vlar
regarding Coelacanths evolution since the End Cretaceous extinction event
See, Aristotle came up with the earliest recorded system of taxonomy after visiting the Isle of Lesbos.
originally posted by: rnaa
"you are to establish the Science of Taxonomy".
There were multiple Genus of Coelacanth and each of those many Genus had multiple species.
originally posted by: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
a reply to: Gothmog
One day, Ted (Theodore) Logan (ain’t that Wolverine’s name??) looked over at Bill S. Preston, Esq., (ain’t he the fifth Beatle??) and said with a locked jaw, “I can’t quit you...”
And that is the rest of the story!
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: peter vlar
regarding Coelacanths evolution since the End Cretaceous extinction event
What's the empirical evidence supporting this knowledge?
"Do you make this crap up as you go?"
Seriously, show me real empirical observations and explain why you or anyone else can make such a bold claim about knowing what happened to an organism 65 million years ago.
See, Aristotle came up with the earliest recorded system of taxonomy after visiting the Isle of Lesbos.
originally posted by: rnaa
"you are to establish the Science of Taxonomy".
It's not taxonomy in general I am ridiculing, it is evolutionary taxonomy. But even more so, Pete acts as if those evolutionary classifications are dogma, and scornfully attacks Blue Jay for an issue of semantics. And as per usual, hides behind the semantics to avoid addressing the blatant error in evolutionary theory that Blue Jay was addressing. Typical.
There were multiple Genus of Coelacanth and each of those many Genus had multiple species.
As I said before, all Coelacanths are in the Order of "Coelacanth". So even in your perverted taxonomy, it is still a coelacanth.
originally posted by: peter vlar
Stop playing games. You know as well as I do that Bluejay doesn’t know the difference between animals,order or sub genus and was putting forth the Coelacanth as though it was a specific species of fish, which it is not. And that said species had not changed in over 60 Ma. Which is again false. It’s not my job to debunk their idiotic claims. It’s on them to prove they’ve got a clue and support their own position. Unless of course, you’re operating both accounts? That would explain a lot.