Mueller investigation not looking at DNC connected Russians proves it was corrupt witch hunt

Did miss this? Wasn't the russian lawyer involved in the Trump Tower meeting barred entry from the country and needed a special visa authorization for entry? I seem to remember Loretta Lynch was perhaps involved in authorizing the visa...

ganjoa

a reply to: UKTruth

Is this Sean Hannity? Do you use all his Hollywood like material as your own often? Same cadence, same words, same lack of factual substance. Probably same brain

Just about everything in the Dossier is true. Just by looking at what has been reported and comparing that to the material in the dossier it's easy to see that it isn't "dirty." Some parts of it may not be true but you can't deny that some parts are accurate. Such as Russia's hacking efforts.
The dossier isn't what started the investigation anyways so the entire narrative is debunked.

originally posted by: Stevenjames15
a reply to: UKTruth

Is this Sean Hannity? Do you use all his Hollywood like material as your own often? Same cadence, same words, same lack of factual substance. Probably same brain

Fella, you spouted utter BS and have been called on it.
Take your medicine.

To complete your education:
www.apnews.com...

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a story Feb. 2 about a Republican memo on the Russia investigation, The Associated Press erroneously reported that a former British spy’s work on an opposition research project was initially funded by the conservative Washington Free Beacon. Though the former spy, Christopher Steele, was hired by a firm that was initially funded by the Washington Free Beacon, he did not begin work on the project until after Democratic groups had begun funding it.

Now drift on back to lala land where you seem to spend most of your time.

a reply to: Grambler


Here is analysis of Mueller. Check it out, Its good.

a reply to: Stevenjames15

Yep! Its true for those who have brain washed by the constant barrage of lies from the liberal media.

That train is headed for a wreck. Hang on for dear life

originally posted by: ganjoa
Did miss this? Wasn't the russian lawyer involved in the Trump Tower meeting barred entry from the country and needed a special visa authorization for entry? I seem to remember Loretta Lynch was perhaps involved in authorizing the visa...

ganjoa

And she was indicted for another case too.

🤣

Natalia Veselnitskaya’s indictment, explained

originally posted by: JustJohnny

Or it proves that all of that stuff was conspiracy theory nonsense that went nowhere....

Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Yet the irony is, that by refusing to address these types of questions, specifically those related to information contained in his report (Fusion GPS, Steele Dossier, Misfud, etc), Mueller has given those GOP Congressmen, their supporters and even some undecideds every reason that they needed to suspect that they're not getting the full story and to doubt the credibility of his report. Those people are now going to make their own assumptions about what happened and those assumptions likely will not be favorable to Mueller's report or the case against Donald Trump. And that's why you should want those questions answered, too.

Regardless, this report is one side of the story. The other side deserves a chance to make their case as well, and as part of that, they deserve answers to the questions they asked, even if the answers to those questions ultimately lead to nothing.

originally posted by: Stevenjames15
Just about everything in the Dossier is true. Just by looking at what has been reported and comparing that to the material in the dossier it's easy to see that it isn't "dirty." Some parts of it may not be true but you can't deny that some parts are accurate. Such as Russia's hacking efforts.
The dossier isn't what started the investigation anyways so the entire narrative is debunked.

You don't keep up with current events much, do you?

Christopher Steele admitted during a lawsuit deposition that he used internet searches and unverified information to support details he had gathered about a web company mentioned in the dossier, according to select pages of his deposition transcript that a federal court unsealed this week.

www.cnn.com...

a reply to: Grambler

Here is the real 1,000$ question...


Assuming trump has evidence to back his claims, proving it and prosecuting the democrats accountable would only help trump, So why isn’t he???

He owns the DOJ , so he absolutely has the authority to hold people accountable if there is evidence they.broke laws

a reply to: vor78

No trump has propagandized the appearance of that..

Trump has the authority to declassify ANYTHING..

So assuming his claims about the fisa warrant are not fabricated.. all he has to do is declassify it..his point is proven..

NO MULLER REQUIRED..

Concerning Trumps claims of “felonies committed by Hillary colluding with the Russians, and many other things!!”


Well trump runs the DOJ..

Every department head is a trump appointee...


So why is there not even an investigation, let alone any chance of prosecution of Hillary for any of trumps claims????


Assuming he has real evidence of crimes by Hillary, TRUMP ONLY BENEFITS FROM PERSUING THEM!!

a reply to: JustJohnny

There is an investigation

That is what ig Horowitz is doing

And that is irrelevant to the op

Was mueller investigating Russian interference?

Did he say mifsud was a Russian asset that lied to The fbi?

Did he let mifsud off the hook?

Yes

Trump has nothing to do with that

a reply to: JustJohnny

So assuming his claims about the fisa warrant are not fabricated.. all he has to do is declassify it..his point is proven..

Trump can't declassify anything until the Inspector General and U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigations are over on these subjects. That's basic 101 kind of stuff.

a reply to: JustJohnny

they have already claimed President Trump obstructed justice, just from tweets.

I cannot imagine what would have happened if he had tried to do this BEFORE the mueller fiasco.

Now that is all done ( AND IT IS ) it will begin with the IG report, and go from there, with FACTS.

Not innuendo like the left used for 22 months.

The Democrats are going to be crushed in 2020.

a reply to: JustJohnny

I think Trump knows how this game is played now. Anything he does in that regard will be called obstruction of justice by the media and the Dems. He's better off not getting directly involved and I think he knows it now.

Give it a little time. The Mueller report took two years. AG Barr has been on the job five months. He says he's looking into these matters and so is the DoJ Inspector General. We'll see.

Still, the point remains. The GOP is under no obligation to believe Mueller. If he's not willing to address their concerns, why should they trust him or believe him? As I said, there may be absolutely nothing there, but the basic principles of fair play still apply. If he wants doubters to believe, he needs to meet them halfway and try to answer some of these concerns and debunk them if he can. Instead, he just gave them every reason to doubt his own report.

originally posted by: JustJohnny
a reply to: Grambler

Here is the real 1,000$ question...


Assuming trump has evidence to back his claims, proving it and prosecuting the democrats accountable would only help trump, So why isn’t he???

He owns the DOJ , so he absolutely has the authority to hold people accountable if there is evidence they.broke laws

What year is it?

Too soon.

a reply to: JustJohnny

Trump is guilty of Obstruction of Tweet 😎

a reply to: tinner07

What actual Russians did they meet with? The Trump tower meeting was a setup by Fusion GPS.

a reply to: JustJohnny

Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake, give them enough rope to hang themselves with.

originally posted by: Stevenjames15
Just about everything in the Dossier is true. Just by looking at what has been reported and comparing that to the material in the dossier it's easy to see that it isn't "dirty." Some parts of it may not be true but you can't deny that some parts are accurate. Such as Russia's hacking efforts.
The dossier isn't what started the investigation anyways so the entire narrative is debunked.

WOW!
Hard to believe after yesterday’s marathon ass handing to the Democrats, that someone would still have the balls or stupidity to make a statement like that.
A team of specialists need to be called in to help you.