It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mtnshredder
I've been around here about 13 yrs and I would feel comfortable in saying that ATS is fairly representative of society in general. A large portion of the members here are intellectually sound, have varied interest and part of the voting populace.
Am running low on names to call Trump so am kind of scraping the bottom of the barrel
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Grambler
Weak deflections. The self-righteous are not amused.
Neither the OP is the topic of this thread, nor some of his old postings. What's the matter now? Cognitive dissonance, confirmation bias or just emotions running high? Could be all of the above tho, never stop framing your perceived enemy after painting them with a broad brush!
Reaffirming the Political Mud Pit Forum Guidelines
The Political Mud Pit was always intended to be a platform for members to hash out their political differences and to contentiously debate tough political issues, unencumbered by the usual constraints of civility and decorum found elsewhere on ATS. See SkepticOverlord's original Political Mud Pit Forum guidelines above.
Specifically:
We've come to accept that many feel the "political stakes" are so high, that intense debate is necessary, and very often name-calling, baiting, and activity we've previously classified as "Political Trolling" are simply part of the process. Have at.
Note that it indicates name-calling, baiting and activity otherwise labeled as political trolling elsewhere on the site. Not generally hateful, bigoted, mean-spirited or gratuitous personal attacks on fellow members. It's also not exempt from the usual forum expectation of remaining on topic.
The Political Mud Pit is not a safe space for trolling for laughs. It's not a place to abuse fellow members. It's not a place to post every inane story you just want to rage about. It's not a place to spam off topic content.
This is simple: The mud pit is not a place where members can personally insult each other. You can rip each other's politics up but you can't get personal just to slag someone you don't like. Additionally, posts must be relevant to the stated thread topic.
Going forward, please be advised that failure to adhere to the stated posting guidelines of this forum will result in staff action against your account, possibly including post-bans and account terminations. Additionally, political trolling outside of the confines of the Political Mud Pit is strictly forbidden and will also be actioned accordingly.
That seems to be assuming that ATS is in anyway representative of society as a whole.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
So you talk about you having facts meanwhile you post no facts, you make asinine claims and then some, and end up proclaiming how you seem to be so better than anyone who DARES not be as far left-wing as you are...
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
ATS radicalized itself. I'm not sure how much it was targeted by.... others. But most of the posters here these days are absolutely nuts. In the last couple years I have seen people cheer for concentration camps, advocate using nuclear weapons on impoverished countries, actively promote domestic terrorist groups (with some posters bragging about having joined said groups), and graphically fantasize about killing their fellow countrymen.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
ATS radicalized itself. I'm not sure how much it was targeted by.... others. But most of the posters here these days are absolutely nuts. In the last couple years I have seen people cheer for concentration camps, advocate using nuclear weapons on impoverished countries, actively promote domestic terrorist groups (with some posters bragging about having joined said groups), and graphically fantasize about killing their fellow countrymen.
originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
All you have to do is step outside ATS to have your opinion validated and shared by the vast majority of the commentariat, academia, Hollywood, and political elites. But one little website has an opposite opinion and it gets you going.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: BuckyWunderlick
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
All you have to do is step outside ATS to have your opinion validated and shared by the vast majority of the commentariat, academia, Hollywood, and political elites. But one little website has an opposite opinion and it gets you going.
The point I am making is more about the nature of how those opinions impact on the course of debate. So take this thread for example. The debate hasn't be so much about the topic at hand but rather a point scoring game, some of the very first posters were deflecting by going over my greatest hits!.
I am trying to stay that when you become part of this, when you ask the guy next to you to move over a little bit so you can join the metaphorical circle-jerk then you actually stop caring about facts. You start debating entirely form the perspective of "who do I agree with" not "who is factually correct"
Let me give you a recent example, no names shall be used.
On a thread a member accused me of claiming that Boris Johnson won the UK election thanks to Russian interference, now I never once said that or hinted at it yet this dude was getting stars and am pretty sure I saw a few supporting posts...yet I never actually said that. Its getting the "pats on the back" not because its accurate but because it hits the right political buttons.
See what am getting at?