It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Feltrick
If R. Mueller was just a figurehead and A. Weissmann was running the investigation to destroy POTUS, why didn't he warn Nadler not to have Mueller testify?
They had this in the bag. Mueller made a statement that made it look like POTUS' hands were dirty, there was no need for further testimony.
There was no point to this other than to make Mueller look completely incompetent.
Could Weissmann and the Left be setting the stage for another investigation, just in time for 2020?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
I'm going to type this slowly so that the slow people will understand.
You cannot exonerate someone who is innocent.
I was under the impression that Schiff was to present absolutely unequivocal, groundbreaking proof that Trump was guilty of being more than an obnoxious, womanizing, multinational businessman.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Feltrick
There were apparently some Twit rumblings that they were trying to make Mueller look so incompetent that they'd have grounds to demand a new investigation because it would be "obvious" Mueller was capable of running a thorough one to begin with.
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
I just wanna give a shoutout to Jim Jordan.
The people behind Mueller looked uncomfortable too lol.