House Judiciary Committee Hearing - Oversight of Report into Russia Investigation - Live Link

a reply to: Grambler

but he looked at a lot more that Barr ever did. You are being unreasonable because reason wont work for you in this instance.
This was a two year long exhaustive investigation and he was in charge of the team. He was not the entire team all rolled into one.
So just stop. This is the weakest of arguments.
Since trump doesnt read anything he signs I would not talk.

a reply to: Grambler

His office staff obviously wrote it. Who do you think? Betty Boop?

This republican is nailing mueller

All sorts of ommissions in the report, on dowd, Kilimnik

And of course the fact that a judge just knocked down mueller for his claim the Russian trolls were working for the Russian government

Mueller had no response

Damning

a reply to: TomLawless

He never investigated anythng to do with Glen Simpson or Fusion GPS or the Steele dossier.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

but he looked at a lot more that Barr ever did. You are being unreasonable because reason wont work for you in this instance.
This was a two year long exhaustive investigation and he was in charge of the team. He was not the entire team all rolled into one.
So just stop. This is the weakest of arguments.
Since trump doesnt read anything he signs I would not talk.

Your MSNBC is showing.

Just

a reply to: Grambler

Mueller wasn't very involved in the investigation.

He just got caught out...

He told the world Russia Troll Farms were real,
yet when the judge asked for evidence - he couldnt produce any.

he tried to palm it off as not being related to the report, but its revealed he states as a true fact Russian Troll Farms exist yet, he has 0 evidence of this.

a reply to: Agit8dChop

Yeah the concord case is blowing him up
the judge in that one is interested in actual real evidence

not made up bs democratic talking points

a reply to: Sillyolme

No you have it backwards

When the media and Dems went after Barr it was for not looking at every single piece of evidence

That was ridiculous

The fact that mueller, who as you say had much more time also didn’t view all the evidence proves if the Dems and media were upset at Barr for this, they should be even more upset at mueller

But they won’t, because they are partisan hacks who knew their complaints about Barr were absurd

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: visitedbythem
I guess we will see what Bob is truly made of. Is he a real Marine, and Patriot? Or is he a boot licking sissy boy with an axe to grind.

A “real marine” doesn’t care about party lines or ideologies. They defend the country according to the laws and orders set forth. They don’t pick sides, they side with the constitution.

That's what I was saying.
The next report is going to be the most interesting and important one. Don't you agree? Horowitz....

Wow! He did it again. Mueller is asked to read something and he deferred to Raskin. Is he having problems reading?

a reply to: Sillyolme

That's an insane assertion and you know it.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: TomLawless

He never investigated anythng to do with Glen Simpson or Fusion GPS or the Steele dossier.

You are right
that is a problem when the above was used as evidence

He doesn't just get to put forward bs as evidence without vetting it

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: TomLawless

He never investigated anythng to do with Glen Simpson or Fusion GPS or the Steele dossier.

We are doing that now. Get your popcorn , and your excuses ready

Lesko nailed him to the wall.


YOU either lied in the report or you are lying now.

He cant even remember his own statements...

those were his words...

Mueller being call out under oath on television is delish
More enjoyable than I even imagined

bobby 2 sticks is a second rate chump

It's really great seeing Congressmen ask succinct questions! I didn't think they had it in them.

Nadler refused to let Mueller finish the answer. Nadler is an a$$ in more ways than one. A fair chairman would have allowed it.

woah..... Nadler well stepped over the mark.

Wouldnt even give time for Mueller to answer that question - that was a brilliant question which showed the report relied on regurgitated news reports nearly 200 times in volume 2..

When Mueller was asked to answer.. Nadler said no and moved on

thats a sore point!