Cancer Cure is Suppressed by FDA and High Cholesterol actually prevents heart disease.

a reply to: one4all

You are right in calling it a crime against humanity.

The problem is that 'they' control everything, from top to bottom.
The tentacles are everywhere, and any grassroots movement is soon infiltrated, and brought to it's knees by any unscrupulous method possible.

To me: the answer has to come from way outside of the box.

a reply to: Nothin

Soon they will even control human birth.

originally posted by: johnalam
a reply to: Lumenari

It’s 2017, and first-time homebuyers have it hard. Around the USA— and the world for that stuff — housing prices in desirable areas have risen steadily since the economic crisis of 2007-2008. For those seeming to settle down, it seems like every day that goes by is a missed chance in a market that appears to have no roof. In the 21st century, is there yet such a thing as cheapland?

Good thing that the cost of living and property is lower in rural areas than urban...

originally posted by: Nothin
a reply to: one4all

You are right in calling it a crime against humanity.

The problem is that 'they' control everything, from top to bottom.
The tentacles are everywhere, and any grassroots movement is soon infiltrated, and brought to it's knees by any unscrupulous method possible.

To me: the answer has to come from way outside of the box.

Not really...today we have the ability and technology to have Global Realtime VOTE on anything anytime...as soon as Ellie is done putting up his satellite web enabeling free global internet acess and use we will have the voting platform we require to finally begin to build a true Global Democracy for this is the ONLY WAY A DEMOCRACY CAN TRULY WORK.....things are outside the box right now.

a reply to: Niks22

Ok, her opening statement is just false. Cure's do not put big pharma out of business. Vaccines do, but not cures. Just because you cure cancer doesn't mean you won't get it four times during your life. Just like the cold or flu.

a reply to: Dfairlite

The cold and flu are not cured either, they are treated. Most people don’t get malignant cancers but most people get the flu or cold in their lifetime.

If there was a cure for cancer, they would have to charge a fortune for it in which most people cannot afford and it would be considered unconstitutional

a reply to: Niks22

Has been recently discovered the ibuprofen has a positive action in colon cancer.

Translate it:

www.insa.min-saude.pt...

originally posted by: JohnyDickhead
a reply to: Niks22

Has been recently discovered the ibuprofen has a positive action in colon cancer.

Translate it:

www.insa.min-saude.pt...

But they also increase risk of cardio vascular problems... if you are a heart patient, taking two pills increase risk of cardiac arrest by 31%... :/ as opposed to not having taken them.

a reply to: Niks22

Yes, I know that they are not cured. Which actually really bolsters the point. Most people get the cold every year (more than once) and they suffer through it with some sudafed. If, for say $30 they could cure it (instead of the $15 to suffer through it with mucinex or sudafed), they'd make way more money than they do now. People will still get the cold. They would simply go for a cure that only makes it last a day instead of suffering for 4-8 days.

Same scenario for cancer. Cancer rates would actually increase if there was a cure. Because those people who die off on the first round would live to see rounds three and four instead. Not to mention the complete destruction of the competition in big pharma for cancer drugs. They wouldn't need to charge an exorbitant amount, in fact it would be less than current treatments (most likely) and still have better margins for big pharma.

The reason there aren't cures for a number of diseases or cancers is because the research hasn't been funded and complete. AI will change this. There are actually a number of curable cancers that we already cure. Thyroid cancer, testicular cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer, just to name a few. Yes we have to find them early enough, but those are curable. So why will big pharma allow cures for those?

People have proven they don't need to have a debilitating disease in order to spend exorbitant amounts on drugs and medical procedures. Look at viagra. Look at plastic surgery. Look at botox. Look at laser hair removal. There's no grand conspiracy to suppress cancer cures. Now a vaccine, you might have a logical argument, but cures, there's no logic in that argument.

ETA: Funny how the anti-vaxxers are all about not taking vaccines when that's what big pharma has the most incentive to suppress, as they actually prevent the disease from occurring and requiring a big pharma treatment.

a reply to: flice

Is that relative risk or absolute risk lol.

Isn’t amazing how much data can be manipulated to manipulate doctors and the general population?

a reply to: Dfairlite

If people still get the cold after cure it’s still not a cure. Flu vaccines cause more flu than preventing it.

Sure there are drugs that do work very well. But they take advantage of this and put out drugs that actually kill you and people take them because many drugs do work. Tylenol and Advil do mask pain.

It’s not just about the money. The elite want to depopulate and they use collaborators who does the dirty work for money.

End game is chaos in order to make people consent to a world government

a reply to: Dfairlite

also what’s the reason for the suppression of Antineoplastons? Is it because they cannot patent it because it exists in the urine and blood of healthy people?

a reply to: Niks22

If people still get the cold after cure it’s still not a cure.

I don't think you understand human biology... at all.

Flu vaccines cause more flu than preventing it.

Not even close to true. In 1918 alone, about 40 million people died from the flu. In 2018 that number was 40 thousand.

a reply to: Niks22

The FDA has approved clinical trials for them. So how are they being suppressed, exactly?

a reply to: Dfairlite

They tried to put the doctor giving treatment in jail? Did you not watch the video?

a reply to: Dfairlite

What was the number when they introduced the flu vaccine much later than 1918?

Where I live, flu shots have only been available since the last 15 years of that

How can the regulatory agencies get anything right when they can't even get the safety of aspartame right. medicalxpress.com...

That article explains how crooked the system is when real evidence is tossed out while evidence that does not say it is safe is allowed to be interpreted to say it is safe.

lol suuuuuuuuure

As far as life expectancy, nothing is more responsible for longer life spans than current day access to energy, clean water, and waste disposal.