It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Death Becomes an Attractive Option to More People The list of qualifying categories for assisted suicide is steadily increasing. In the last ten years, the Netherlands added people with dementia and psychological illnesses. The number of Dutch people who’ve been euthanized has tripled over this period, and 2,000 of those who were euthanized had dementia or mental illness. Even in the more cautious United States, patients with diabetes qualify under Oregon’s Death with Dignity Law. “Don’t be naive,” warned Dutch journalist Gerbert Van Loenen. “It is very difficult indeed to limit euthanasia once you have started.”
Without good proof, the medical industry will not go against those big chemical corporations, especially when the chemical corporations also make pharmaceuticals.
originally posted by: rickymouse
a reply to: schuyler
www.sci-news.com...
This chemical is allowed in food by the FDA.
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: rickymouse
a reply to: schuyler
www.sci-news.com...
This chemical is allowed in food by the FDA.
So? How does that relate to 12 people dying of a bateriological disease? And how does that mean old people are being targeted so they don't talk about the ills of society? And how does that relate to a epidemic that has not happened?
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: rickymouse
That's fascinating information and comes as something of a surprise although it somewhat dovetails with my suspicions. It would seem important to the Leftist elites, which I would guess most of the medical community is, to get rid of the elderly as soon as possible. The smarter retirees I know are leaving the US to retire. And one big reason is medical care.
originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: Sillyolme
No its not all about comic books. Why so cynical?
Age UK: 50,000 elderly in England have died waiting for social care package
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: rickymouse
a reply to: schuyler
www.sci-news.com...
This chemical is allowed in food by the FDA.
So? How does that relate to 12 people dying of a bateriological disease? And how does that mean old people are being targeted so they don't talk about the ills of society? And how does that relate to a epidemic that has not happened?
The chemical can cause a malfunction of the immune system, past immune system knowledge can be lost which means there could be an under or over reaction for a disease a person could have immunity to. Old people are not being targeted, but they are victims of a flawed social network, people are becoming more susceptible to disease, especially older people. These chemicals in our food system are necessitating a need for yearly vaccines since a person does not gain immunity from having the disease or getting vaccinated. This may be the reason that the success rate of vaccines is so poor.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
old people die - its what they do
- HI!!! And our next contestant!!! And what do YOU do, Dave?!!
- Well, a bit of fishing - but mainly dying.
- Oh.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: rickymouse
Again, that's a very interesting post.
My wife has had us on a near salad diet for the last year or so and we eat mushrooms in every salad. They put my wife on statins and she hated them and quit them. Pretty bad experience. When I quit smoking they put me on some drug that had SSRI in it. Didn't like that at all; but quitting the drug was even worse. At this point, we are near drug free.
One thing I've noticed living out here in "the country" in the middle of nowhere at the end of the road between nothing and nowhere, is that the elderly will often have some type complaint that requires "invasive" testing like where they send the camera down your throat into your stomach, and they either find nothing or maybe an ulcer and send the patient home with some meds to treat the ulcer.
Then, usually about a year later, they get extreme abdominal pain, go to the doctor for another such camera test and BOOM, they got stage 4 stomach cancer. Its almost like.............they either caused the cancer with the previous years test, OR they implanted the cancer while doing the test.
Next procedure is of course Chemo; and they're told, "well, yea, there are other cancer treatments but your insurance won't pay for them until you've completed the full Chemo course". I've never seen anyone cured by the Chemo and in fact, everyone we know has been killed by the Chemo.
The other racket we're seeing is any and all joint pain is fixed by a knee or hip replacement and of course, they have to both be done. Its almost like, "if the only tool in your tool box is a scalpel, every problem looks like a surgery". The profit margin on those procedures must be utterly immense.
There's no doubt in my mind that after Trump, when the Dems take final and full control, they'll push biggly for euthanasia in order to save money on Medicare/Medicaid. It will of course start off as voluntary, but then.......
Whatever.............at the end of the day we're all DMW............"Dead Men Walking".
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: rickymouse
That's fascinating information and comes as something of a surprise although it somewhat dovetails with my suspicions. It would seem important to the Leftist elites, which I would guess most of the medical community is, to get rid of the elderly as soon as possible. The smarter retirees I know are leaving the US to retire. And one big reason is medical care.
Here is an article to read. Remember, they are pushing Statins on older people and middle age people quite a bit these days, twenty five percent of middle aged people now take Statins and lots were given them and had to quit because of complications so the twenty five percent is just the tip of the iceburg. I know quite a few people stuck on Statins and even more who discontinued them because of the doom and gloom feeling that they got when on them.
www.sciencedaily.com...
The brain is made of about seventy five percent or more of cholesterol and when you start cutting back on cholesterol, the body takes it from the areas of highest concentration.
Mushrooms contain a chemical called levostatin which is a statin. Just eat mushrooms with your steak or put mushrooms into the spaghetti to keep your cholesterol down. The oyster mushroom has the most levostatin, but button mushrooms have some too, the button is a sort of baby bella or portabella mushroom I think. Other mushrooms also have some effect with this and also many have other properties. I like some fried mushrooms with things, some people cannot eat mushrooms, but there are other things that contain statin chemistry, but in lower amounts.
Statins also can cause problems with vitamin D and with the human form of squalene which helps to protect us from some diseases. They interupt some of the cycles in the body. Too much of the Oyster mushrooms can also cause this problem, but you do not eat mushrooms every day, the body can recover.
The heart burns fats to work, it is a special lipid that the body creates. It does not burn glucose. There is concern by some doctors that by taking statins can be bad for the heart. The brain burns glucose which in turn creates a glutamine compound to feed the gut so it can up it's parastolic action. So glucose can be a laxative. The brain cannot burn fructose without the liver converting it to glucose. So tell people to eat more fruits. It does make you so you are calmer and easy to fool I suppose, there are many types of sugars and everyone has different amounts of metabolites they can make. It is not easy for me to even identify what is best for me let alone try to advise people as to what they can eat. I am going to try to identify some of the symptoms to try to work with others to identify if they have problems, but they have to pay attention.
Doctors rarely tell people what to eat or not to eat, they know that everyone has a different metabolism and that people have different metabolic and allergy issues. I understand why they don't get into this, it is time consuming, a doctor only has an hour max with you at an appointment....so they prescribe things to treat symptoms. Trouble is symptoms of many conditions and diseases have similarities, it is easy to misdiagnose a treatment plan properly, the doctor also does not know how your diet is so they just try to make a logical guess based on the evidence they have. Sometimes it works, sometimes it does not. Sometimes it works and then the patient alters his diet and the meds become toxic to them too. Their diet change took care of the problem and they are then on long term meds that hurt them.
It is complicated.