It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Asylum seekers are fleeing their homes and running for their lives.
Sigh...
90%+ of them are not truly asylum seekers, they are gaming the system.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: vonclod
When you put someone into federal custody, you(figuratively) are responsible for their care, they become a ward of the state..understand?
When trying to care for thousands of people who should not even be here, it takes money... understand?
When certain people in Congress refuse to fund the BP to provide the funding they need to care for the people in custody, the fact that there is no money to provide basic care for them is on those people in Congress... understand?
Besides... if you read, you'll find the conditions are not as bad as the article makes it sound.
You'll also read that BP agents are paying for things out of their own pockets...
So, go yell at the democrats in Congress who are refusing to properly fund the BP.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
The Northern Triangle is one of the world’s most violent areas, with drug trafficking, gangs and other actors of organized crime fueling a high regional murder rate. In 2015, a total of 17,422 murders were committed across the Northern Triangle countries. The region is home to around 31 million people, but the violence has been causing a mass exodus of Central Americans trying to illegally enter the United States every year.
So... sounds like these countries need to clean up their acts.
But again - there is a legal definition of the requirements for claiming asylum.
These conditions don't meet the requirements.
If you think they should, go advocate for changing the legal definition to include them, then we'll have something to discuss.
The libs are so smart they get to decide what laws are good and any laws they don't like can just be disregarded. Coincidentally, only laws that interfere with their quest for power are bad.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Sookiechacha
BTW, since it's obvious you are blind as well. The Obama administration did not give blankets to many of the children in cages, many only had tinfoil for blankets and slept with a #ty matress, or even nothing else but a dirty blanket on the floor...
Since at least 2009-2010 the Obama administration had ALL illegal children and their parents living in these conditions...
From:
By WNN Editors Team on August 25, 2014
...
Unaccompanied child migrants face extra trauma once inside U.S.
From:
Marcelo Suárez-Orozco | August 25, 2014
...
UCLA faculty voice: Immigration is a family matter
From:
Obama's Illegal Detention Centers
From:
Prayer for the Week July 20 2014 Help for Immigrant Children in Detention
I could keep on going showing these photos, Obama was doing this since around 2009-2010 until the end of both his administrations, but there were no massive protests by left-wingers, and you were not demanding what you are of your current POTUS, Trump...
Where were you then protesting that Obama allowed illegal children to be separated from their parents and lived in such horrid conditions?...
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: face23785
The libs are so smart they get to decide what laws are good and any laws they don't like can just be disregarded. Coincidentally, only laws that interfere with their quest for power are bad.
You just described President Trump and his administration! He doesn't want to comply with the Flores Settlement. He wants those pesky immigration laws changed. He wants to get rid of immigration judges He want Congress to get rid of asylum laws, family reunification and lottery visas.
It's the Trump administration disregarding subpoenas and thumbing their nose at the rule of law, not the libs.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Krakatoa
The difference is that those were accompanied minors, and Trump's concentration camp are filled with children who were ripped from their parents as a punishment and a deterrent for claiming asylum and looking for refuge.
Meanwhile, our very own Congress wants a pay-raise... for doing what?
Oh you mean they've been denying people their due process hearings and just deporting people en masse without trial?
www.uscis.gov...
To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Flatcoat
Wrong.
www.uscis.gov...
To obtain asylum through the affirmative asylum process you must be physically present in the United States. You may apply for asylum status regardless of how you arrived in the United States or your current immigration status.
It doesn't matter if they hopped a fence. swan across the Rio Grande or came in through ports of entry.
A defensive application for asylum occurs when you request asylum as a defense against removal from the U.S. For asylum processing to be defensive, you must be in removal proceedings in immigration court with the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR).
Were apprehended (or caught) in the United States or at a U.S. port of entry without proper legal documents or in violation of their immigration status, OR Were caught by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) trying to enter the United States without proper documentation, were placed in the expedited removal process, and were found to have a credible fear of persecution or torture by an Asylum Officer. See Questions & Answers: Credible Fear Screenings for more information on the Credible Fear Process.