It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: Blue Shift
If it's fairly far away, then it's performing a slow/stopping maneuver without changing pitch, and would be pretty difficult for a conventional aircraft to accomplish.
I think the movement we see is the result of the camera moving, not the object. I don't have the time to confirm it now, but I think I saw the tree branches moving in relation to each other, meaning that there was a change in perspective, the result of a movement of the camera.
originally posted by: Macenroe82
Very weird witnessing this after seeing the multitude of sightings reported over the past few days.
originally posted by: mahatche
the part where it goes behind the tree looks like bad CGI.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
So you add up that conservation of momentum says it should re-appear to the right side of that branch and it doesn't, with the incongruent behavior of the photographer where she doesn't even seem to expect to see it re-appear from the right side of the branch, and it seems sloppy. But if anybody wants to explain how that happened if it's real, I'll listen.
Did you read your link?
originally posted by: Blue Shift
You're right, assuming that it didn't have some kind inertial mass reduction device in it.
patents.justia.com...
These extremely high EM field intensity values emphasize the novelty of this concept, especially suited for the design of energy generation machinery with power output levels much higher than those currently achievable.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
That might be possible though it doesn't seem likely given the spaces in the branches, but then the real problem is it doesn't keep moving to the right and come out the right side of that branch at 35 seconds like it should have if it was a real object with momentum.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Can you PLEASE comment on this:
But the camera seems relatively stable from 33-34 seconds, then the object flies behind a branch, then the photographer doesn't wait for it to fly out from behind the branch, why not? That's what i don't understand. And then yes they move the camera when it doesn't re-appear on the right side of the branch. If it was an airplane it shouldn't be able to hide behind that branch when it was consistently moving to the right during the preceding time.
originally posted by: ArMaP
It was certainly moved just before the object disappears behind the branches on the right, when the object appears to move sideways. I hope this slowed down version (2 fps) shows better what I am saying. Look at how the distance between the branches on the left and their relative positions change, showing that the camera was moving.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
If it was an airplane it shouldn't be able to hide behind that branch when it was consistently moving to the right during the preceding time.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Did you read your link?
These extremely high EM field intensity values emphasize the novelty of this concept, especially suited for the design of energy generation machinery with power output levels much higher than those currently achievable.
So then you could say maybe the aliens have that technology, so it's aliens, but then you'd have to believe it's just a huge coincidence that they happened to put the brakes on just so that it happened to stop behind one branch as seen from the view of one human.
originally posted by: Diaspar
Hi. Apologies, new here so no screenshots to post of the following. I have taken them from your 2 fps vid, but i can't seem to upload them into this reply (or see where i can upload to then 'insert an image from your library').
Possible signs of cgi not getting those frames correct or the brightness of the object 'drowning out' the dark branch / leaf at that point?