It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JeremyCorbell
a reply to: Springer thanks for the post you guys. The Q&A was filmed live in McMinville Oregon for the UFO Fest they had there where I was able to bring Cmdr. David Fravor and Bob Lazar to do exclusive and long-form interviews to be able to share the moment with the public. It was an impossible task... but it happened. This was a LIVE premiere of the Lazar portion of that weekend. Bob goes over details of his experience, putting 30 year mysteries to rest in under 30 seconds at times. He answered questions like “How was the gravity amplifier turned off”... simple questions that have been looming for 3 decades. You also get to see George Knapp and Lazar talk about the more personal aspects of that time... how they “tussled” for the tape that revealed Bob’s identity because he didn’t want his face and identity out in the public minutes before it was about to air... so it’s a historic moment... and I’m so glad you get to see it. Love or hate Lazar - it would be reckless to discount him without hearing what HE has to say. So enjoy!
originally posted by: Springer
He described vehicles that perform JUST LIKE what was captured on the now infamous "Tic Tac" video...
If it turns out the TicTac video was an anomaly of the radar system I will concede that point, but, it will require much technical data to make me a believer in
I don't see any anomaly in the Tic Tac video. I see misinterpretations of what the display shows by people who don't understand the display, like this misinterpretation by a retired physics professor, talking about acceleration when the video shows no acceleration. It may appear to show acceleration to people who don't understand how the display works, but once you understand the display, the apparent acceleration near the end is about zero.
originally posted by: Springer
He described vehicles that perform JUST LIKE what was captured on the now infamous "Tic Tac" video...
If it turns out the TicTac video was an anomaly of the radar system I will concede that point, but, it will require much technical data to make me a believer in
LT.__________ was clear in that he couldn’t confirm that it was the same object as described by FASTEAGLE flight. He never had visual, only seeing the object via the FLIR.
originally posted by: Groot
originally posted by: IMSAM
Lazar said this ufo came from an archaelogical dig?If so where and when?
originally posted by: gortex
Sad that it wasn't a live Q&A with Bob but the video was a good watch , I still don't disbelieve Bob Lazar , if he is a liar he could make a fortune selling pet Unicorns.
Who cares about birds and planes when you can spend money on figuring out how to travel through wormholes instead? It's a lot faster. Too bad that although the author of this paper keeps saying it's not science fiction, in terms of today's technology, it's pretty much science fiction. This is where some of the 22 million dollars went, researching fringe science like this:
originally posted by: Guest101
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Consider this: AATIP got 22 MILLION dollars, and the info we got from TTSA implies they weren’t even able to deduce from their own sensor data:
O That the object in the ‘FLIR1’ video did not show any sudden acceleration.
O That the object in the ‘go fast’ video had the speed of a large bird.
O That the object in the ‘gimbal’ video matches the exhaust of a jet.
Something that was deduced by the people at Metabunk in just a few weeks at a budget of 0 dollars…
I'm not sure if it's really a third option to those two or a twist to them, but Grant Cameron thinks that he's seen the same thing play out before multiple times with multiple targets where apparently high level government officials feed information to the target, and the target thinks it should be a reliable source so they tend to believe it. In that scenario it's not TTSA deliberately misleading the public (though the people feeding questionable information to Tom DeLonge/TTSA might be doing so deliberately), though you can justifiably question their competence. I don't think anybody on the TTSA staff is a professional video analyst, so it's sort of a twist on your option 2.
Logically, there are only two possible explanations for this:
1 TTSA is deliberately misleading the public
2 Their competence doesn’t match their enthusiasm
Given the fact that TTSA consistently frames the UFO phenomenon as a potential threat in the MSM, I find both possibilities equally disturbing…