It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xabi87
How the heck is this law going to be enforced? Are KFC gonna get a fine for aiming their adverts at hungry people? Because non hungry people can still eat KFC ya kbow!
#ing joke this country is becoming, full of fannies.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: everyonedies
American individualism is ladies first.
Bidot’s hope is that with consistent representation in the fashion industry and in the media, the conversation will shift. “It’s not about what size your swimwear is or how much your thighs may jiggle. It’s about going out in the sun and having a great time.”
At a time when our brain processes images 60,000 times faster than words Straight/Curve sets out to change the imagery we are seeing and to bolster a movement that is redefining society’s unrealistic and dangerous standards of beauty to impact society at large
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: InTheLight
Sonalee Rashtwar? Is that you?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: InTheLight
You sound like her.
Instead of being proud of being overweight, people should be working to shed the pounds. No, for a lot of people, it's not easy, but it can be done. It's not even that hard. I've dropped 50 lbs over the course of the last two years.
The big hurdle for most is that you have to cut out sugar, pop, and processed convenience food.
It means you have to go back to cooking for yourself most of the time, and that means some extra work.
“This is fatphobia, shaming other people’s bodies and passing judgement on their health is not your business, and excluding diverse bodies is the opposite of progress,” Lawrence wrote in a post on Instagram.
“News flash: I am more healthy NOW than I was when I was thinner because being skinny does not equal being healthy.”
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: Xabi87
The people enabling these PC driven initiatives and laws have nothing in common whatsoever to anyone I know and are doing so for reasons that no-one I know supports.
These people seem intent on changing the very fabric of our society through social engineering and information control and manipulation.
Judging by the ultra-sensitivity of the snowflake generation it seems to be working.
That begs the questions; to what end and who benefits?
“For me, the importance of it was… actually (seeing) representation of my body type in fitness. It’s not something I ever had,” Taylor told Global News. “Women athletes aren’t just a size small.”
She believes the mannequins will help crush the myth that plus-size women can’t exercise.
“So many people think that a plus-size body can’t be active. I work out six days a week,” she said.
“I could be standing next to somebody who’s thin, and somebody might think that they’re healthy. Meanwhile, they don’t go to the gym and they don’t eat very well.”
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: InTheLight
You sound like her.
Instead of being proud of being overweight, people should be working to shed the pounds. No, for a lot of people, it's not easy, but it can be done. It's not even that hard. I've dropped 50 lbs over the course of the last two years.
The big hurdle for most is that you have to cut out sugar, pop, and processed convenience food.
It means you have to go back to cooking for yourself most of the time, and that means some extra work.
Nobody should be forced to change themselves to accommodate others. Not all perceived overweight people are fat, some perceived overweight people are shaped that way by DNA.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: InTheLight
You sound like her.
Instead of being proud of being overweight, people should be working to shed the pounds. No, for a lot of people, it's not easy, but it can be done. It's not even that hard. I've dropped 50 lbs over the course of the last two years.
The big hurdle for most is that you have to cut out sugar, pop, and processed convenience food.
It means you have to go back to cooking for yourself most of the time, and that means some extra work.
Nobody should be forced to change themselves to accommodate others. Not all perceived overweight people are fat, some perceived overweight people are shaped that way by DNA.
Why the assumption that the only reason you lose weight is for others? It's for your health that you do it. There a ton of health issues related to carrying extra weight. Everything from extra wear and tear on your joints leading to musculo-skeletal problems like worse arthritis and joint replacements to increased risk of cancer to higher risks of diabetes and other similar metabolic issues (high blood pressure, etc.).
My whole family has high blood pressure. I'm still clocking in 120/80 *after* coffee in the morning in my 40s because among other things, I'm a healthy weight. I feel better now than I did when I weighed 50 lbs more. I have more energy. I *want* to do active things again.
And we're not talking about BMI which is a flawed measure. We're talking about healthy weight. There are different frames your body can have: small, medium, and large. You can have different body types: ectomorph, mesomorph, etc. Depending on which combo you are, your body shape will be different when you reach your healthy weight. I'm tall and lean as an ectomorph with a large frame, so my ideal weight is higher which is fine even though I look plenty thin now.
But other body shapes, heights, and frames will have different targets and different looks. Some will look chunkier but still be perfectly fine and healthy. Not everyone is going to look supermodel thin, and in fact, that's not healthy at all.