It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -8teen-

page: 127
144
<< 124  125  126    128  129  130 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 07:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: IAMTAT

TAT, 27th minus 4th gives 23.

Therefore moving from "cease fire" to "ending the Korean War" gives PAIN (23) to the cabal?



Whoa. Nice Work.
July 4TH: Today we take a look at the Declaration of peace.

July 27TH: Peace Declared.



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 07:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
'Cease Fire'...in the Korean War was issued July 27, 1953...and has been in effect ever since.

I wonder if Trump is going to declare an official end to the Korean War sometime this July (4th? 27th?)...66 years after the cease fire.


I missed this: H.Res.152 - Calling for a formal end of the Korean war.

Sponsor: Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17] (Introduced 02/26/2019) ....17....




Whereas, on June 25, 1950, the armed forces of North Korea attacked South Korea, an action which the United Nations Security Council determined constituted a breach of the peace under chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, after which the United States militarily intervened in the conflict in defense of South Korea;





affirms that the United States does not seek armed conflict with North Korea; (7) would welcome a statement by President Trump, in coordination with South Korea, declaring the end of the state of war with North Korea;


Here is the head scratcher... 34 Democrat Cosponsors (2X17)

Among the names: AOC, Omar, Tlaib, Ted Lieu

Which begs the obvious question RE: Yesterday's Amazing Event.

ADD, if the US never formally declared war, but entered at the behest of the UN (allegedly) then who declares an end to the war?

If it is exclusively NK and SK then they are well within their rights to do so anyway they choose (public or private). I'm on the record saying it is a done deal, so for me DJT's walk simply confirms. What does this do to the UN?
edit on 1-7-2019 by crankyoldman because: add



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


Sufi...Any significance to the number 66?



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 08:07 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

In relation to anything specific? Or just generically?

The obvious one is that 6 = F, so...

66 = FF = False Flag


edit on 1-7-2019 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 08:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: IAMTAT

In relation to anything specific? Or just generically?



Well, if the Korean War is officially ended this month...The Cease Fire will have lasted 66 years.



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

See my edit to previous reply... 66 = False Flag therefore whole war was a False Flag?


edit on 1-7-2019 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 08:11 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

5ixty.5ix years ..... Now wouldn't that be something


Don't mind me ... ... I'm a FREE thinker
edit on 712019 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)
late edit .. extra tY on second(s) 5ix

edit on 712019 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 08:20 PM
link   
DJT doesn't even use a line anymore, they just jump right into the boat and fry themselves up...




“The Obama administration was begging for a meeting, there were begging for meetings constantly, and Chairman Kim would not meet him,” Trump said on Sunday.





Trump is lying. I was there for all 8 years. Obama never sought a meeting with Kim Jong Un. Foreign policy isn’t reality television it’s reality. — Ben Rhodes





Rice tweeted out that it would be “stating the obvious” that Obama sought no such meetings with the North Korean leader.


And here is your Chocolate Ice Cream Sundae...




James Clapper: "In all the deliberations that I participated in on North Korea during the Obama administration, I can recall no instance whatever where President Obama ever indicated any interest whatsoever in meeting with Chairman Kim."



Helluva foreign policy... unless that was the actual point


Link



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 08:25 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Or September Libra Facebook New Currency ???
bitcoin.com.au...



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 08:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: crankyoldman

And here is your Chocolate Ice Cream Sundae...

James Clapper: "In all the deliberations that I participated in on North Korea during the Obama administration, I can recall no instance whatever where President Obama ever indicated any interest whatsoever in meeting with Chairman Kim."
Helluva foreign policy... unless that was the actual point


Link
. James clap'per ... Sweating bullets ... How many BALD geniuses.. how many can you count thru recorded history.... ? Live and learn ... James ...

God Bless America
edit on 712019 by MetalThunder because: Clean up on isle. 777



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 09:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: crankyoldman
DJT doesn't even use a line anymore, they just jump right into the boat and fry themselves up...




“The Obama administration was begging for a meeting, there were begging for meetings constantly, and Chairman Kim would not meet him,” Trump said on Sunday.





Trump is lying. I was there for all 8 years. Obama never sought a meeting with Kim Jong Un. Foreign policy isn’t reality television it’s reality. — Ben Rhodes





Rice tweeted out that it would be “stating the obvious” that Obama sought no such meetings with the North Korean leader.


And here is your Chocolate Ice Cream Sundae...




James Clapper: "In all the deliberations that I participated in on North Korea during the Obama administration, I can recall no instance whatever where President Obama ever indicated any interest whatsoever in meeting with Chairman Kim."



Helluva foreign policy... unless that was the actual point


Link


The Obama Administration "had" a Policy on North Korea?

That's news to me.......
Obama's lackeys don't even realize how stupid they sound trying to prove Trump wrong. It's like Lucy and the football with Charlie Brown.



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 09:15 PM
link   



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 09:16 PM
link   
a reply to: pavil

History will show .... More of Foriegn apology policy methinks lol
Better as the Orkin man




posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 09:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


Sufi...Any significance to the number 66?


If it means anything to ya "6.6" .. few threads back..

. At approximately T-6.6 seconds, the main engine is started and liftoff finally occurs at T-0!


countdowns used by Nasa



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 09:52 PM
link   
FROM

REX
@[email protected]
social.quodverum.com...@REX/with_replies

KEEP AN EYE on Att John Huber's twitter account.
Huber has been increasingly active - and direct - in recent days. Today he was on TV, talking about betrayal of the country.

Could be nothing, but to me this seems significant.
Experienced, senior prosecuting attorneys such as Huber are typically VERY discreet.
This may indicate that the DOJ investigations and prosecution decisions are done.

Fingers crossed.

Link:
mobile.twitter.com...



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 10:03 PM
link   
Very very soon
BOOM

dailycaller.com...



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 10:07 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

IG Report is apparently done. 20% classified. Getting turned over to AG May keep it from public view for some time.

It sure seems like Barr is consolidating Huber, Hwitz, and Durham into a single channel. He saw first hand how this Congress plays with summaries and reports. The AG’s next play has to be so overwhelming that Nadler and Co. are neutered.

Barr’s not going to be fooling around with House subpoenas at every turn.

IMO, unload the meat of this around Aug 2020. Right after congress goes on recess. By the time they try to act, it will be too close to Nov and best to let the next House deal with it.

Leaving a little desert action for midOct just before the election.

Trigger the &$!? out of the Left.



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 10:15 PM
link   
Senate rejects attempt to curb Trump's Iran war powers.

thehill.com...




Senators voted 50-40 on the proposal from Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (Va.) and Tom Udall (N.M.) to block the president from using funding to carry out military action without congressional authorization.


I thought everyone agreed that potus power like this SHOULD be rained in? That we should go back to the constitution and move away from the patriot act and other power grabs.



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 10:19 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

So sounds like this may be near the end of the month with the review and possible redactions of classified info.

This gives hope and I/we sure need to see some form of closure to this.

Wonder if the Dems are going to try to get in an impeachment vote before it comes out.



posted on Jul, 1 2019 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: scraedtosleep

The House completely eff’d up the border crisis. It went from a goat rodeo to a soup sandwich in the time the Left took control.

Giving that group ANY say in anything really dangerous; NK, Russia (they humped that one already), China, or Iran... the Senate would be brought up on charges of depraved indifference.

The current House just needs to keep doing what it’s doing to ensure it flips again in 2020.




top topics



 
144
<< 124  125  126    128  129  130 >>

log in

join