It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vonclod
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: M5xaz
I think honestly that the job of a Nurse has changed a lot over the last 20 years or so and I don't really think that the vast majority of the public quite understand how. I don't think they realise that its actually the nurse who might be reading that ECG or interpreting that blood work, they just see someone cleaning bums and taking BP's but they don't actually see the calculations involved in getting the drug dosages just right, they don't see the nurse who has just passed that ALS course that the doctor sitting next to them failed. They don't quite get that the reason for the doc putting in that chest drain is actually because a nurse felt the surgical emphysema, or that actually its the nurse who knows exactly what to put on that nasty wound, I could honestly go on all day the point is that these days nurses do much much more than I think the public give them credit for. That even before you start looking at the kind of work of nurse practitioner's/specialists/managers and even nurse consultants.
PRECISELY !!!!!!!!!!!
Could not have said it better.
Actually, Otherside said it infinitely better than you, he just gave info, you just tried to belittle along with adding info.
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: M5xaz
Address the stolen ID aspect separately. That to me is like having an IT whiz who got a job using someone else's name answer for the ID theft, and prove they're competent enough for the job with only their own name & knowledge. Two separate things to address.
You're awfully triggered on this one. No one applauded the ID theft, just the alternative way of going about being a competent nurse. She essentially did it that way, with no issues FOR TWO DECADES. That certainly goes to show you don't need to dump a lot of money on the education if you can effectively apprentice your way in an industry old-school style. Why are you trying so hard to justify the cash grab end?
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: M5xaz
Address the stolen ID aspect separately. That to me is like having an IT whiz who got a job using someone else's name answer for the ID theft, and prove they're competent enough for the job with only their own name & knowledge. Two separate things to address.
You're awfully triggered on this one. No one applauded the ID theft, just the alternative way of going about being a competent nurse. She essentially did it that way, with no issues FOR TWO DECADES. That certainly goes to show you don't need to dump a lot of money on the education if you can effectively apprentice your way in an industry old-school style. Why are you trying so hard to justify the cash grab end?
You are the one greatly triggered by reality, buddy.
Yes, those with University degrees are better than you - get over yourself!
Fooling the system for two decades just proves she is a good con-man.
Where is your source to claim she was competent ? - because she fooled the system 20 years ?
By your "logic, Bernie Maddoff, who stole BILLIONS from clients for decades before being arrested, was also competent guy, right ??
SMH
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: M5xaz
Address the stolen ID aspect separately. That to me is like having an IT whiz who got a job using someone else's name answer for the ID theft, and prove they're competent enough for the job with only their own name & knowledge. Two separate things to address.
You're awfully triggered on this one. No one applauded the ID theft, just the alternative way of going about being a competent nurse. She essentially did it that way, with no issues FOR TWO DECADES. That certainly goes to show you don't need to dump a lot of money on the education if you can effectively apprentice your way in an industry old-school style. Why are you trying so hard to justify the cash grab end?
You are the one greatly triggered by reality, buddy.
Yes, those with University degrees are better than you - get over yourself!
Fooling the system for two decades just proves she is a good con-man.
Where is your source to claim she was competent ? - because she fooled the system 20 years ?
By your "logic, Bernie Maddoff, who stole BILLIONS from clients for decades before being arrested, was also competent guy, right ??
SMH
Calm down, Suzie, before you mess your undies in your hysteria.
Evidence lending toward competent worker was right there in the article -- she signed up to further her education and was only caught then. It stands to reason she had taken similar classes before and thus was not unfamiliar with the intricacies of her job.
Where's YOUR evidence to the contrary?
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: M5xaz
Address the stolen ID aspect separately. That to me is like having an IT whiz who got a job using someone else's name answer for the ID theft, and prove they're competent enough for the job with only their own name & knowledge. Two separate things to address.
You're awfully triggered on this one. No one applauded the ID theft, just the alternative way of going about being a competent nurse. She essentially did it that way, with no issues FOR TWO DECADES. That certainly goes to show you don't need to dump a lot of money on the education if you can effectively apprentice your way in an industry old-school style. Why are you trying so hard to justify the cash grab end?
You are the one greatly triggered by reality, buddy.
Yes, those with University degrees are better than you - get over yourself!
Fooling the system for two decades just proves she is a good con-man.
Where is your source to claim she was competent ? - because she fooled the system 20 years ?
By your "logic, Bernie Maddoff, who stole BILLIONS from clients for decades before being arrested, was also competent guy, right ??
SMH
Calm down, Suzie, before you mess your undies in your hysteria.
Evidence lending toward competent worker was right there in the article -- she signed up to further her education and was only caught then. It stands to reason she had taken similar classes before and thus was not unfamiliar with the intricacies of her job.
Where's YOUR evidence to the contrary?
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: M5xaz
Address the stolen ID aspect separately. That to me is like having an IT whiz who got a job using someone else's name answer for the ID theft, and prove they're competent enough for the job with only their own name & knowledge. Two separate things to address.
You're awfully triggered on this one. No one applauded the ID theft, just the alternative way of going about being a competent nurse. She essentially did it that way, with no issues FOR TWO DECADES. That certainly goes to show you don't need to dump a lot of money on the education if you can effectively apprentice your way in an industry old-school style. Why are you trying so hard to justify the cash grab end?
You are the one greatly triggered by reality, buddy.
Yes, those with University degrees are better than you - get over yourself!
Fooling the system for two decades just proves she is a good con-man.
Where is your source to claim she was competent ? - because she fooled the system 20 years ?
By your "logic, Bernie Maddoff, who stole BILLIONS from clients for decades before being arrested, was also competent guy, right ??
SMH
Calm down, Suzie, before you mess your undies in your hysteria.
Evidence lending toward competent worker was right there in the article -- she signed up to further her education and was only caught then. It stands to reason she had taken similar classes before and thus was not unfamiliar with the intricacies of her job.
Where's YOUR evidence to the contrary?
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: M5xaz
Address the stolen ID aspect separately. That to me is like having an IT whiz who got a job using someone else's name answer for the ID theft, and prove they're competent enough for the job with only their own name & knowledge. Two separate things to address.
You're awfully triggered on this one. No one applauded the ID theft, just the alternative way of going about being a competent nurse. She essentially did it that way, with no issues FOR TWO DECADES. That certainly goes to show you don't need to dump a lot of money on the education if you can effectively apprentice your way in an industry old-school style. Why are you trying so hard to justify the cash grab end?
You are the one greatly triggered by reality, buddy.
Yes, those with University degrees are better than you - get over yourself!
Fooling the system for two decades just proves she is a good con-man.
Where is your source to claim she was competent ? - because she fooled the system 20 years ?
By your "logic, Bernie Maddoff, who stole BILLIONS from clients for decades before being arrested, was also competent guy, right ??
SMH
Calm down, Suzie, before you mess your undies in your hysteria.
Evidence lending toward competent worker was right there in the article -- she signed up to further her education and was only caught then. It stands to reason she had taken similar classes before and thus was not unfamiliar with the intricacies of her job.
Where's YOUR evidence to the contrary?
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: M5xaz
Address the stolen ID aspect separately. That to me is like having an IT whiz who got a job using someone else's name answer for the ID theft, and prove they're competent enough for the job with only their own name & knowledge. Two separate things to address.
You're awfully triggered on this one. No one applauded the ID theft, just the alternative way of going about being a competent nurse. She essentially did it that way, with no issues FOR TWO DECADES. That certainly goes to show you don't need to dump a lot of money on the education if you can effectively apprentice your way in an industry old-school style. Why are you trying so hard to justify the cash grab end?
You are the one greatly triggered by reality, buddy.
Yes, those with University degrees are better than you - get over yourself!
Fooling the system for two decades just proves she is a good con-man.
Where is your source to claim she was competent ? - because she fooled the system 20 years ?
By your "logic, Bernie Maddoff, who stole BILLIONS from clients for decades before being arrested, was also competent guy, right ??
SMH
Calm down, Suzie, before you mess your undies in your hysteria.
Evidence lending toward competent worker was right there in the article -- she signed up to further her education and was only caught then. It stands to reason she had taken similar classes before and thus was not unfamiliar with the intricacies of her job.
Where's YOUR evidence to the contrary?
No, annually taking continuing education classes is something ALL Nurses must do; they have no choice in the matter.
It is not proof of any competence - many of the courses are group sessions where you attend a set number of hours for credit and where there is no exam.
The only reason anyone at that training session would go to the trouble of running a background check on the fake nurse is because her answers or comments to basic medical facts were glaringly wrong
You are, again, speaking of ignorance through your arse.
Assholes are butthurt ignoramuses that try to defend that :
Ignorance > Knowledge
The JEALOUSY and ENVY are strong with this one....