It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A carefully redacted footnote within a report by FISA Court Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer has always appeared to be a clue to a domestic surveillance program. Now details behind the redactions tell a concerning story.
A brief refresher is needed for those new to the story. In April 2017 Judge Collyer wrote a highly critical FISA Court opinion following discoveries by Director Admiral Rogers of government contractors accessing the NSA database, and extracting illegal search results from the electronic records of every American.
The scale of abuse was incredible [SEE HERE] and the surveillance issues had been covered up for years. Collyer cited the Obama administration as having “an institutional lack of candor” in their responses to her and the FISA court. The judge focused her criticism after a review of the period 2012 through April 2016.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Dfairlite
I mean hard evidence admissible in a court of law.
originally posted by: Hecate666
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Dfairlite
I mean hard evidence admissible in a court of law.
Is that the new ATS standard? You have to find evidence good enough for court in order to tell us about a Conspiracy Theory?
If that's so, ATS has to close down, because if all our suspicions had evidence, the world would be a much better place.
Maybe just entertain the idea and do some research yourself?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Hecate666
No. Talking about it here is fine. We've been talking about Q here for a long, long time, and I've been active in that thread. I'm not saying the OP is far wrong at all, but I am saying that in order for it all to come out in reality, it has to meet that standard. Conjecture stands for conspiracy theory, but in order to stand in the regular world, there has to be more.