It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Agit8dChop
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
originally posted by: Agit8dChop
Bush deserves to be hung at the Hague for what he did to Iraq
What about all the people him and his cronies killed in New York City?
There's still people that believe this garbage?
OSWALD WAS FLYING UNITED FLIGHT 93!
Garbage?!....
All i can say is the 'official story' of 9/11 is tripe....
originally posted by: primus2012
LOL The Hague? Americans don't submit to the global police farce.
Sorry but that's not the case. They've attacked pipelines before. And oil tankers.
Globalists are everywhere. That’s why it’s called Globalism. You never heard of all these people that attend the Bilderberg meetings? But if course there are countries who take advantage.
originally posted by: AtomicKangaroo
originally posted by: primus2012
LOL The Hague? Americans don't submit to the global police farce.
lolwut?
America IS the global police farce.
It's pretending to be the 'global police farce' that has caused some of these problems. Just some, because even if the U.S stayed home and cleaned up its own backyard for once the Middle East would still be a backwards #hole for the most part because of dark ages thinking still existing in those places in regards to religion and politics.
Wesley Clarke is CFR. What’s he doing “exposing” their plans anyway ?
originally posted by: harold223
originally posted by: face23785
“This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.”
originally posted by: harold223
He got the timing wrong, its been a lot longer than 5 years. What is the only country on that list yet to be hit?
People still believe this crap? Not one of those countries has been "taken out" by the US. The only one you could even argue is Libya because we supported the ousting of Gaddafi. How's that working out for us? Yeah, we got total control over Libya and we're reaping the financial benefits... except we're not. Great plan they had there.
Like the supposed pipeline theory, that we're gonna gain control over all these countries including Syria to establish a pipeline and that's the reason for all the wars. And that plan supposedly started in the 90s and started with the invasion of Iraq in 2003. It's 2019! The old rich #ers supposedly behind this better hurry up, they're gonna be dead before this master plan is finished.
Never said I thought it was a great plan, it wasn't. I don't think General Wesley Clark thought much of it as a plan either. All of those countries have been attacked in one way or another either by the US, or Israel. Iran is the only one left. The plan is there, the success upon which it is being carried out is debatable, that much I agree.
Point is, if Trump attacks Iran, he is clearly carrying on the same agenda.
originally posted by: elysiumfire
face23785:
Sorry but that's not the case. They've attacked pipelines before. And oil tankers.
So, you don't actually know if it was the Iranians in these attacks. There's no real evidence that the Iranians were involved, just supposition and accusation. The tankers were attacked (apparently) by the Yemenese, whilst the pipelines was classified as a terrorist attack, but linked to Iran by its enemies. Could we not equally state that those were false flag operations, too?
It is well known that the Saudis hate the Shi'ite Muslims of Iran, and it is also known that the Saudis are seeking to control all oil revenue in the Middle-East. America would prefer that the Saudis controlled all the oil in the region, too, for many reasons, most of them selfish.
Like I said, how many American lives have been ear-marked for expendability? If America attacks Iran, it will be for business and corporate reasons, not moral ones.
US warns airliners flying over Persian Gulf amid Iran tensions
www.dw.com...
The US aviation regulator has warned that "military activities" and "political tensions" could put flights at risk. Washington has increased its military presence in the Gulf amid a worsening spat with Iran.
originally posted by: 2012newstart
US warns airliners flying over Persian Gulf amid Iran tensions
www.dw.com...
The US aviation regulator has warned that "military activities" and "political tensions" could put flights at risk. Washington has increased its military presence in the Gulf amid a worsening spat with Iran.
looks to me the war is closer than ever. Despite Iran said again there will be no war. What did Sun Tzu say?
‘There will be no war in Gulf region,’ despite wishes of Trump’s ‘B Team’ – Iran’s Zarif www.rt.com...