Uranium One plus Clinton equals Russia is planning to build its first nuclear aircraft carrier

originally posted by: 35Foxtrot

originally posted by: luthier
Not sure if you are aware. But Russia has all the fuel they need for an aircraft carrier. It doesnt take much to run an aircraft carrier. That is why the engines are used.

I'm assuming you're talking about non-nuclear powered vessels.

Sure, they have tons of fossil fuel sources in the Rodina, but having a nuclear powered carrier gives one a new level of endurance and flexibility in terms of force projection that you just don't get with the oil/fossil fuel powered vessels.

That is, if you don't get yourselves a lethal rad dose building it and/or - more relevant when it comes to Russia and their history - maintaining the reactor.

Russia is literally one of the largest producers of nuclear energy in the world.

Uhhh. they didn't stop with the accident.

The mining company is going to help them design a nuclear aircraft carrier.

They also already have several nuclear subs.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: ufoorbhunter

I agree with your premise of the balance but the USSR was a dystopia.

We were on the lucky side of the Berlin Wall...

Having talked to plenty of Ruskies, ex east Germans, Ukranians well I'm not so sure if we had the lucky side in reality.

They said they had a belief back then in a better world where humanity was being united in a common goal of equality instead of 0.01 % running off wit all the profits, also how they had a fantastic welfare system and also guaranteed housing, jobs, amazing healthcare, living in a country where great achievements were being made in tech and space, also helping poor third world countries out of poverty by sending educated aid overseas, also being able to move feely around the USSR instead of being penned into artificial man made nationalistic ethno religious states like today.

Things in reality were quite different in the 1980's compared wit what our Western MSM was infiltrating our minds with

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Like when they sent spies to FORD and forgot to write down what materials each part were and made the worlds heaviests cars?


Of coarse the other part would be a mining company doesnt usually design aircraft carriers.

Rooshen design always stronk, you are jealous capitalist dog.

Lol. No I drive a Russian sportscar......said no one ever.

originally posted by: luthier

originally posted by: 35Foxtrot

originally posted by: luthier
Not sure if you are aware. But Russia has all the fuel they need for an aircraft carrier. It doesnt take much to run an aircraft carrier. That is why the engines are used.

I'm assuming you're talking about non-nuclear powered vessels.

Sure, they have tons of fossil fuel sources in the Rodina, but having a nuclear powered carrier gives one a new level of endurance and flexibility in terms of force projection that you just don't get with the oil/fossil fuel powered vessels.

That is, if you don't get yourselves a lethal rad dose building it and/or - more relevant when it comes to Russia and their history - maintaining the reactor.

Russia is literally one of the largest producers of nuclear energy in the world.

Uhhh. they didn't stop with the accident.

The mining company is going to help them design a nuclear aircraft carrier.

They also already have several nuclear subs.

I'm talking about their "luck" so far with carriers specifically and maintenance issues in general.

If you really think they're top-notch engineers with a safety record to match, I can't help you.

originally posted by: ufoorbhunter

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: ufoorbhunter

I agree with your premise of the balance but the USSR was a dystopia.

We were on the lucky side of the Berlin Wall...

Having talked to plenty of Ruskies, ex east Germans, Ukranians well I'm not so sure if we had the lucky side in reality.

They said they had a belief back then in a better world where humanity was being united in a common goal of equality instead of 0.01 % running off wit all the profits, also how they had a fantastic welfare system and also guaranteed housing, jobs, amazing healthcare, living in a country where great achievements were being made in tech and space, also helping poor third world countries out of poverty by sending educated aid overseas, also being able to move feely around the USSR instead of being penned into artificial man made nationalistic ethno religious states like today.

Things in reality were quite different in the 1980's compared wit what our Western MSM was infiltrating our minds with

Well that sounds awesome at face value.

I'm yet to see any evidence though.

If you have any links then I would love to learn more.

originally posted by: 35Foxtrot

originally posted by: luthier

originally posted by: 35Foxtrot

originally posted by: luthier
Not sure if you are aware. But Russia has all the fuel they need for an aircraft carrier. It doesnt take much to run an aircraft carrier. That is why the engines are used.

I'm assuming you're talking about non-nuclear powered vessels.

Sure, they have tons of fossil fuel sources in the Rodina, but having a nuclear powered carrier gives one a new level of endurance and flexibility in terms of force projection that you just don't get with the oil/fossil fuel powered vessels.

That is, if you don't get yourselves a lethal rad dose building it and/or - more relevant when it comes to Russia and their history - maintaining the reactor.

Russia is literally one of the largest producers of nuclear energy in the world.

Uhhh. they didn't stop with the accident.

The mining company is going to help them design a nuclear aircraft carrier.

They also already have several nuclear subs.

I'm talking about their "luck" so far with carriers specifically and maintenance issues in general.

If you really think they're top-notch engineers with a safety record to match, I can't help you.

I mean you would need to have English as a third language to get that from my posts. And be terrible at it.

My point is they don't need a mining company to have fuel for carriers. They need designs. I dont understand the OP post about Uranium One unless it's just a partisan hack job.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: ufoorbhunter

Once we get rid of Asia the CPI will reveal how terrible inflation is. While excellerating the drive for AI and automation to keep cost low and profit high.

Very good point Automation is going to have to go in the bin too along with the asians. Nuke it or at least hold it back. Man, not just humanity I mean manking but specifically the male (man) needs something too gets his teeth into, if you take away that need to get it on then idle hands lead to drug infested hell holes when man has nothing to do then the rot sets in China nuke it and held back automation

Wrong place sorry.

But that view sounds more Chinese direct economy government control of the market and pricing than holding the ideal of a free market like in the us even if a true free market isn't possible.

originally posted by: Waterglass
a reply to: ufoorbhunter

I agree almost every dam country is screwed up today. Only China prospers in today's world.

Dirty buggers the lot of them. It's not as a race I don't like them, I mean they are people just like everyone but as a state / nation mindset I despise Chinese having dealt with them as many on here will have done and been sold down the river by their dirty underhand thieving state sponsored mind sets. Nuke em for sure and the world will be a better place then get Cold War V2 on with Vlad and sort out Christian lands and get them going once again making things and giving our peoples livelihoods and their prides back

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Wide Eyes you need to speak to Ex Soviets from back in te day specifically the 70's and 80's to get an idea of how screwed our MSM was back then.

Don't get me wrong there were bad things in USSR and bad things in NATO states back then for sure but the world for the average man in the street was better back the. Just check out our cities to see how out of control the world has become since they suppressed the balance of power and handed over things to the asians specificaly Cinese

originally posted by: luthier

originally posted by: 35Foxtrot

originally posted by: luthier

originally posted by: 35Foxtrot

originally posted by: luthier
Not sure if you are aware. But Russia has all the fuel they need for an aircraft carrier. It doesnt take much to run an aircraft carrier. That is why the engines are used.

I'm assuming you're talking about non-nuclear powered vessels.

Sure, they have tons of fossil fuel sources in the Rodina, but having a nuclear powered carrier gives one a new level of endurance and flexibility in terms of force projection that you just don't get with the oil/fossil fuel powered vessels.

That is, if you don't get yourselves a lethal rad dose building it and/or - more relevant when it comes to Russia and their history - maintaining the reactor.

Russia is literally one of the largest producers of nuclear energy in the world.

Uhhh. they didn't stop with the accident.

The mining company is going to help them design a nuclear aircraft carrier.

They also already have several nuclear subs.

I'm talking about their "luck" so far with carriers specifically and maintenance issues in general.

If you really think they're top-notch engineers with a safety record to match, I can't help you.

I mean you would need to have English as a third language to get that from my posts. And be terrible at it.

My point is they don't need a mining company to have fuel for carriers. They need designs. I dont understand the OP post about Uranium One unless it's just a partisan hack job.

Sorry if I misunderstood you replying to my criticism of Russian capacity for providing safe nuclear power and functional aircraft carriers.

Your listing of examples of Russian ability in those and similar areas must be what confused this wretched speaker of English. Or, maybe your skills in that area are the ones lacking?

Lastly, my post had nothing to do with the tenuous - at best - linking of this story to Uranium One by the OP.

Maybe I'm just having a bad morning and misunderstood your post and what you were trying to say.

No big deal. FIDO.

Peace and Love

That's nice... that carrier is a wreck on the water.

And they could very well do this.

But as for using any Uranium One product... well Canada has to get approval from the US for any sale of the actual uranium out of Wyoming to any country other than the US and no uranium from U1 mines in Wyoming has ever been sold to Russia.

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

In the US crime was far worse. We had a massive coc aine war in Miami that makes Chicago's gang wars look tame and crime throughout the US was far higher. We also had far worse forms of surgery, diagnosis of illness etc...

We live in the safest easiest time in all of human history.

That is why you are here complaining instead of fighting off bandits or trying to collect fire wood and eat squirrels.

originally posted by: JIMC5499
F8ck Russia.

And the ship they came in on.

a reply to: Bluntone22

Never happened.

Read and learn...

www.factcheck.org...

a reply to: luthier

There is no black and there is no white there is strands between that reflect light in a different way

originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
a reply to: luthier

There is no black and there is no white there is strands between that reflect light in a different way

In terms of debate there sure is. All bachelors are not married. There are truths that are a prioiri

High level satire here.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Bluntone22

Never happened.

Read and learn...

www.factcheck.org...

Collusion didnt happen either.
Read and learn.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Bluntone22

Never happened.

Read and learn...

www.factcheck.org...

From your article

"The donations from those with ties to Uranium One weren’t publicly disclosed by the Clinton Foundation, even though Hillary Clinton had an agreement with the White House that the foundation would disclose all contributors. Days after the Times story, the foundation acknowledged that it “made mistakes,” saying it had disclosed donations from a Canadian charity, for instance, but not the donors to that charity who were associated with the uranium company."

My question, what is a charity donating to the clinton foundation that could be used for campaigning? I thought to be a charity you had to be helping people in need. Not a campaign. It sounds like the charity is a front, with Uranium one actually donating a lot of the excess money going to the Clintons.

I do not like fact check because they often twist information to accomodate the ones funding the fact check agencies. They do include the deception but twist it to look legit half the time. They try to steer our focus so we see what they want us to see. Much of their Fact checks are created by their own beliefs how to translate the evidence too.