It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
No I'm not.
You pretended I was speaking about speech when I clearly said I was speaking about conduct.
This was immediately after you revealed that you do not believe in the 1st amendment at all, even if you regularly use it when you lack any other argument.
We have allowed those in power more power.
Speech is conduct.
I'm glad you, as a total foreigner, are outraged that I think there are limits on Constitutional free speech.
I think dirty perverts shouldn't solicit children for sex, you don't as you proved in our other conversation.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
Speech is speech.
I’m not outraged. I just think it’s funny to profess the constitution yet you flout it every chance you get. I already know you don’t like free speech either.
I don’t think they should either, and never said otherwise.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Tartuffe
I noticed your resurrected and disingenuous self didn't answer the question I asked in another thread and again here:
Should a pervert be allowed to solicit children for sex in the name of unlimited free speech, yes or no?
originally posted by: Tartuffe
Do you believe that Congress should make no law abridging the freedom of speech?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Tartuffe
Do you believe that Congress should make no law abridging the freedom of speech?
Sorry Les Mis, I'm not answering your question until you man the hell up and answer mine:
Should a pervert be allowed to solicit children for sex in the name of unlimited free speech, yes or no?
originally posted by: Tartuffe
I see some cracks in your composure. Name-calling?
I’ll answer it again: no.
Do you believe that Congress should make no law abridging the freedom of speech?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Tartuffe
I see some cracks in your composure. Name-calling?
What name? Your old screen name? I guess if you feel that's an insult than that's your issue.
I’ll answer it again: no.
So if a pervert cannot solicit children for sex how can there be unlimited free speech? You just limited the pervert's.
Do you believe that Congress should make no law abridging the freedom of speech?
I believe some laws are required because the notion of unlimited free speech has no basis in reality.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
You do not believe in the first amendment free speech clause of the constitution, nor do you believe in free speech. I hope you change your mind one day.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Tartuffe
You do not believe in the first amendment free speech clause of the constitution, nor do you believe in free speech. I hope you change your mind one day.
Neither do you then since you agreed that perverts shouldn't be able to solicit sex from children which is the stance I have taken several times. Unlimited free speech is just your lame grandstanding position until reality comes along and slaps you upside the head with a real world example of why it doesn't work.
originally posted by: Tartuffe
...and believe in absolute free speech.
If you were a good parent you wouldn’t need anything to protect your children.
originally posted by: valiant
Canadian man obsessed with free speech and Americans/american politics, throwing out word salads with his Thesaurus on hand, yet can't even fathom the basic argument that absolute free speech doesn't exist and why.