If You're a White Democrat, You Must Hate Yourself to Win a Nomination

Woke Litmus Test

That's right.

You must signal to others that you hate your whiteness; that your success is only because of your whiteness; that whiteness must be punished; that whiteness is to blame for all of the world's ills.

This is the litmus test: Are you, as a candidate, sufficiently racist against white people? If white, do you grovel at the feet of the SPLC and beg forgiveness? Do you engage in enough self-deprecating rhetoric to sufficiently demonstrate your pathetic self-loathing?

That's what "woke" is to these racist maniacs--hate yourself for being white and we'll consider voting for you.

More f# racist insanity from the left.

Former U.S. Rep. Beto O'Rourke of Texas has acknowledged he "clearly had advantages" as a white man. Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts has said that any struggle she faced as a single mom was much more challenging for black women. U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan of Ohio has talked about not knowing many black people when he was growing up. And Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Indiana, recently said , "Any white candidate needs to show a level of consciousness around issues like white privilege."

a reply to: NthOther

Ummm Bootie-judge candidate loves white guys.


Just sayin

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: NthOther

Ummm Bootie-judge candidate loves white guys.


Just sayin

Well...if he LOVES white guys so much...why doesn't he marr…

...nevermind

What if you're a white male, and you identify as an Indian woman?

I did once.

Surely it is trans-phobic to say that I can't.

So, some politicians may look like white males, but they can freely claim to be all kinds of women.

Or am I wrong?

a reply to: halfoldman

White males cannot have fluid identities.

When a white male identifies as something other than a white male, it's cultural appropriation, which is bad.

But only for white males. Women can identify as anything they want. If a white male has an operation to change his anatomy...

...s# now I'm confused.

a reply to: NthOther

3 years ago...


www.bls.gov...

In 2016, for example, the overall civilian unemployment rate was 4.9 percent, while the rates for the major race and ethnicity groups ranged from 3.6 percent for Asians to 8.4 percent for Blacks or African Americans; the rate for Whites was 4.3 percent in 2016, and the rate for Hispanics or Latinos was 5.8 percent.

Today...
townhall.com...

Trump’s economic policies are improving the lives of black Americans, just like he promised. Black unemployment continues at historic lows, manufacturing jobs are back, paychecks are up, meaningful prison reform has happened and his urban renewal plan, which includes significant incentives for inner-city investment, is making a difference.

www.peoplespunditdaily.com...

As a result, we are seeing real wage growth for the first time since the Great Recession. Wages rose by 3% in the fourth quarter (Q4) 2018 for the first time since 2009, and have risen by 3% or greater for 7 consecutive months.

That’s real wage pressure as a result of a very tight labor market with very strong demand. The 3.4% year-over-year wage gain in the February Employment Situation report is the highest since April 2009.

The decline in the black unemployment rate under Donald Trump was and is being driven by positive labor market conditions. The decline under Barack Obama was largely a methodological gimmick.

Their "litmus test" should be rolled into a tight cylinder and shoved up their ass. It's a last ditch effort to recapture the gains pandering and racially motivated elitism "Oh, you can't do it yourself because you blacks aren't as advantaged as white people are. You need white people to restrict themselves so you can compete." if that's not racism, then WTF is "racism?" The actual racists in the USA, the majority of them, are on the left side of the aisle. They're the ones who, through actions and words, remind minorities that they are inferior and cannot succeed on their own on a daily basis. They hold them down in exchange for handouts in exchange for votes to keep the left in power. It's racist, it's fascist, and it's disgusting. It looks like minorities are getting smart to it, though, and starting to display the courage and dignity required to tell their oppressors "Enough" and start voting for politicians who actually view them as equals and believe in their capabilities as human beings, unlike what the minorities were bought to support in decades past.

The top two contenders for the democrat nomination are two very old white men.

Biden and Bernie.

a reply to: NthOther

Speaking of the need for 2019 whitey to apologize for the conduct of 1619 whitey for bringing those first 20 African slaves and dumping them in Jamestown, Virginia (starting a popular 300 year trend to own a slave) - bring on Jussie Smollett to talk about his bleached out lynching ordeal carried out by 'this is MAGA country' white-faced winter nocturnals - he kept the sammich to prove it.

I love that story

originally posted by: ausername
The top two contenders for the democrat nomination are two very old white men.

Biden and Bernie.

They should just settle it with a Hoveround race.

It's too bad that the Democratic party focus has shifted away from jobs and opportunities to ethnicity and sexuality. In my experience, if you have money and a decent job -- or can make other people money -- nobody really cares all that much what color you are or who you go to bed with.

Just because Reagan busted the unions doesn't mean you can't create new unions that can address the employment issues we have today.

But that kind of thing just doesn't grab the voters, I guess. At least not the ones who they want to woo. Too bad. Those issues really need to be addressed in a progressive way.

originally posted by: ausername
The top two contenders for the democrat nomination are two very old white men.

Biden and Bernie.

A Get-off-My-Lawn-A-Thon

A Jewish Communist, a septuagenarian diddler, a fake Indian, and a fake Mexican walk into a bar... the bartender says "What is this, some kind of joke?" No, it's the 2020 DNC field.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
A Jewish Communist, a septuagenarian diddler, a fake Indian, and a fake Mexican walk into a bar... the bartender says "What is this, some kind of joke?" No, it's the 2020 DNC field.

You forgot the fake Roman gladiator.

Democrats in the biggest quandary in History 😎

Whatever they say and do goes against themselves 😎

a reply to: NthOther

Umm, there isn't actually any such actual test, it is merely someone's (who also obviously also has nothing to do with the Democrats) opinion piece.

Why do people who obviously have nothing to do with the Democratic party keep telling Democrats what they must do?

Someone has some hare-brained opinion and then it gets echoed on some right wing site, then a whole lot of right wingers uncritically re-post and misquote it everywhere in a circle jerk of idiocy.

This is the very definition of fake news.

a reply to: chr0naut

Who called it news?

"F# leftist insanity" is what I believe I called it.

Which it undeniably is.

Would you care to defend it?

Add Swalwell's sorry ass to the mix.

What a virtue signaling douchebag

originally posted by: NthOther
a reply to: chr0naut

Who called it news?

"F# leftist insanity" is what I believe I called it.

Which it undeniably is.

Would you care to defend it?

It's some right winger's opinion about what they think a leftist might think. If anything, it's a right wing persecution insanity like we have seen so much of from and about Trump.

a reply to: chr0naut

It's all been true. Obama spied on his campaign, The 24 hour news cycle continuously admonished him and accusde him of being a Russian asset.

All the while a coalition of gender confused, politically inept, adult-like toddlers went on a nearly 3 year long temper tantrum. This tantrum consists of violence, threats, baseless accusations, more violence, intimidation, did I mention violence?

I think most people have had quite enough of the Democrats and the leftist douchbags they enable.