Treasury Declines House Request for Trump’s Tax Returns

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

oh my.... emoluments alone give them cause. Get real.
They have a shopping list of offenses and reasons.
Gonna be another loss for naval orange.

No its not.

Lol

There is 0% chance you will ever see Trumps taxes.

See how that works, I can claim anything i want as well without proof

a reply to: Sillyolme

They have a shopping list of offenses and reasons.

Provide any.
"They" have jack Squat.
Bobby 2 sticks failed them.
Had they anything they would not be chasing tax returns from someone the irs has already audited.
Say it with me "legitimate committee purpose"

looks like you take another L

I wonder if the Sec of Education can request college records against the wishes of an individual?

I bet there is some kind of law against fishing expeditions without an expectation of what will be found and that particular thing would be proof of illegal activity. And just maybe that law would override other minor laws. Let me look...

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized

nvm

Trump turn in those taxes yet?
It is tax day and all....

a reply to: shooterbrody

Why so you can shoot them down?

1)To determine if U.S. national security is at risk of being compromised by the president’s financial conflicts of interest
2)To determine if Trump has conflicts of interests bearing on his trade and tariffs policies.
3)To determine whether the president is violating the U.S. Constitution by receiving benefits from foreign countries without Congress’ consent
4)To determine whether he is benefiting from his tax policies despite his many public assertions to the contrary
5)To determine whether the IRS is adequately auditing the president
6)To inform the consideration of additional disclosure requirements for candidates and officeholders

Under these circumstances, it is not only appropriate but also vital to the functioning of our democracy for Congress to seek an answer to the basic question: Is President Trump working for the interests of the country, or himself

www.americanprogress.org...

a reply to: shooterbrody

There is no way around the request.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: highvein

It's too late for the democrats.

They went full retard. They should have known you never go full retard.


Seriously though?

This is a coup attempt. They aren't going to say, "Sorry", and stop. They HAVE to win and succeed with the coup or else they will get slammed and end up with charges of treason. So in order to save their own sorry asses, they HAVE to continue and succeed with the coup.

As the saying goes: if you strike the king, you'd better make sure you kill him. And the Dems have struck the king.

a reply to: Sillyolme

5)To determine whether the IRS is adequately auditing the president

This is the only legitimate purpose they have, and they should search away. They actually do not need the potus returns to find this out.
As to the others, nothing but a garbage fishing expedition with the intention of embarrassing the sitting potus.
The courts will ultimately decide this. Wonder if trump will have replaced RBG by then?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

There is no way around the request.

lol
have the returns been produeced?
looks like there is a way, at least up till now

maddow will have them at 8 again, right?

Perhaps they will call maddow to testify as she has the goods?

a reply to: shooterbrody

Why will RBG matter? I know you guys all think that the judges will go against the law to bow down to trump but I hate to tell you that won't happen.
As my mom used to say spit in one hand and wish in the other. See which one gets filled first.

a reply to: shooterbrody

They will be or someone is going to jail for five years. Oh no mr bill.......

a reply to: shooterbrody

Yeah try to muddy the water.
That has nothing to do with this story or this request.
Its just you flinging mud. Trying to distract from the real story.

Nice try.... will work on some.... but not on me.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I hate to tell you that won't happen

when you have been continuously wrong why would anyone listen?

You know Bobby Boucher's momma told him alligators was ornery cause they had all them teeth and no toothbrush?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

They will be or someone is going to jail for five years. Oh no mr bill.......

Sure they will......
Will mueller be arresting them too?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

Yeah try to muddy the water.
That has nothing to do with this story or this request.
Its just you flinging mud. Trying to distract from the real story.

Nice try.... will work on some.... but not on me.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

They will be or someone is going to jail for five years. Oh no mr bill.......

No one is going to jail

Lol

a reply to: Aazadan

I was basing it off your posts, which said they could seize the servers.

Even copying the data, which is likely in the Petabyte range, will take quite a bit of time during which the servers have to be down. One cannot copy a dynamic system. I'm sure you realize that.

TheRedneck

a reply to: Sillyolme

oh my.... emoluments alone give them cause. Get real.

That's called "unsubstantiated allegations." They'll need something called "evidence."

TheRedneck