AG Barr says spying did occur and will be investigated

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Tartuffe
The ruling party spied on their political opponents. This is bigger than Watergate.

I believe you could find that sentiment in posts here as early as 2016.
Lots were on the ball here early.

It was obvious from the very beginning...well, not unless you filled your brain with garbage from the liberal media complex.

I wish we could bring back hanging just for these most arrogant seditionists..
Their soft coup has failed.

Flashback! mobile.twitter.com...

Huh ... I seem to recall how Trump said he was spied on and everyone laughed at him. I wonder if that's one of those "Dumb Lies Trump Told ..."

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: UKTruth

Bet it burns them up that trump outlasted them.
Not only did he beat "her", he beat them as well.

Steady now.

It's early days yet.

yes but having a sitting ag state that the former admin was spying on its political rivals is humongous
legal or otherwise.
when else in history has this been acknowledged by the highest leo in the land?

Fair point.

Something else that's interesting ... And may be investigated.

When Trump fired Comey which is the basis most use for their obstruction of justice complaints, didn't he do so using a letter written by Rosenstein which recommended such a move as part of his reasoning? And wasn't it Rosenstein who was caught up then in the wearing a wire and 25th Amendment capers?

So doesn't that start to look like an internal setup on Rosenstein's part either with or without Comey's complicity?

1. Write a letter recommending Comey's removal.

2. Start agitating for obstruction based on the removal you helped recommend?

originally posted by: ketsuko
Huh ... I seem to recall how Trump said he was spied on and everyone laughed at him. I wonder if that's one of those "Dumb Lies Trump Told ..."

Indeed, one of the biggest threads here on ATS about this very thing.
In fact it went on so long I think a Part 2 had to be created....

Where are all of those people now?

a reply to: ketsuko

Yes, and interestingly enough, James Baker testimony just released
contradicts Rod Rosenstein's claim the the 25th amendment and wire
wearing tactic discussed was not a joke.

lawandcrime.com...

I'm still wondering about RR....

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: ketsuko

Yes, and interestingly enough, James Baker testimony just released
contradicts Rod Rosenstein's claim the the 25th amendment and wire
wearing tactic discussed was not a joke.

lawandcrime.com...

I'm still wondering about RR....

I believe RR (after "discussions" with Trump) was told he could either resign and possibly get indicted, or he could stay and help broil his own CrowBurger. 😎

a reply to: xuenchen

Hmm good theory. I think your onto something big Xue.

That would make perfect sense, and he would know exactly
who to throw under the bus too. Glorious!

originally posted by: ketsuko
Something else that's interesting ... And may be investigated.

When Trump fired Comey which is the basis most use for their obstruction of justice complaints, didn't he do so using a letter written by Rosenstein which recommended such a move as part of his reasoning? And wasn't it Rosenstein who was caught up then in the wearing a wire and 25th Amendment capers?

So doesn't that start to look like an internal setup on Rosenstein's part either with or without Comey's complicity?

1. Write a letter recommending Comey's removal.

2. Start agitating for obstruction based on the removal you helped recommend?

And then the President says days later he removed Comey for the "Russia Thing". The very person who gave trump the memo about Comey's conduct started the Mueller probe because of the very thing the president said contradicting his early statements.

a reply to: Pyle

Now the same people are all being investigated for how they handled that "Russia Thing"" too.

a reply to: Pyle

Show me where Trump said that in context and I will show you why 💥🚬💥

And now from the Washington Compost, demands that Barr
be impeached. This is going to be fun, the Dims wont know
which way to go soon, and will end up chasing their tails.

originally posted by: burntheships
And now from the Washington Compost, demands that Barr
be impeached. This is going to be fun, the Dims wont know
which way to go soon, and will end up chasing their tails.

based on what?
that he disagrees with them?

what a bunch of loons!

P.S.
Wouldn't that involve the senate?
Do they not understand they do not have the numbers for such an event?

a reply to: burntheships

and RR appointed Mueller who the day before was in Trumps office...

a reply to: shooterbrody

Apparently so.

Jennifer Rubin LOL. I thought she was a Democrat
but maybe she is a never Trumper...or should we start
calling them Never Truthers?

www.cnn.com...

This is classic....

Link

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday she doesn’t trust Attorney General William Barr and suggested his statements alleging President Donald Trump’s campaign was spied on undermine Barr’s independence as the nation’s top law enforcement officer.

a reply to: burntheships

how about just idiots?
the body that just confirmed the guy into office is going to remove him because orange man bad?
these people are ridiculous

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: burntheships
And now from the Washington Compost, demands that Barr
be impeached. This is going to be fun, the Dims wont know
which way to go soon, and will end up chasing their tails.

based on what?
that he disagrees with them?

what a bunch of loons!

P.S.
Wouldn't that involve the senate?
Do they not understand they do not have the numbers for such an event?

Oh, they understand all right.

They understand the ignorance of the lemmings, whos votes they are trying to attract.

They believe that talking points, and rhetoric can instigate outrage among the brainwashed populace, that can't be bothered with, nor have the ability to, think in rational terms.