-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -Q-

@sneakyrod

A MASSIVE little snippet Mueller snuck into his statement that I somehow overlooked. This confirms my overall thesis on Mueller’s involvement in other ongoing investigations and the fact that MUELLER LOOKED INTO THE OTHER SIDE!

This is clouded legal speak that is hard for regular folk to catch up on. Let’s break it down.

“Our underlying work product is being decided in a process that does not involve our office”

Mueller’s product from his work is being decided on in an office separate from the SC.

Mueller’s product is being reviewed elsewhere and the decision on what to do with his findings are being “decided” on by other entities. Mueller is referring to all these “unspecified criminal investigations” as seen in the Flynn sentencing memo!

Anons knew this last year. One tiny sentence glossed over amid the furor.

I know..."Shut Up already about Mary Price, TAT."


Nevertheless, Mary on Brennan:

Well Good Morning again folks. Beautiful day here. The Roses are ready to pop. Ever wonder why it was so easy for Brennan to work with Russian intelligence?

Remember Brennan was a communist in the old days and had a number of contacts in Russia he worked with and trusted. He was really too close and gave away things that he should not have.

Yep he was compromised.

He was a bit confusing to me and really dumb as a rock. Several times he received information from the Russians on matters and then turned around and went in the wrong direction. He was not really to be trusted but a useful tool.

Can you imagine Brennan being taped and not have a clue. He needed to understand he was set up so in the future if a favor was needed he would cash a check for the other side.

TWITTER
maryprice
@marypri72202525

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: cherokeetroy

I tried to tell you guys that barr was going to do things by current doj policies.

And whatever declass he lets go will have redactions too.

This is way trump put it on barrs shoulders. Trump never intended to mass declass but now you all will blame barr. lol

Trump is using barr as a shield because he knows that his base want declass that he (for whatever reason ) isn't going to give.

If that's true, if Barr isn't transparent and if he's another deep state lackey, then prepare for civil war because a lot of people will be pissed off

originally posted by: IAMTAT
I know..."Shut Up already about Mary Price, TAT."


Nevertheless, Mary on Brennan:

Well Good Morning again folks. Beautiful day here. The Roses are ready to pop. Ever wonder why it was so easy for Brennan to work with Russian intelligence?

Remember Brennan was a communist in the old days and had a number of contacts in Russia he worked with and trusted. He was really too close and gave away things that he should not have.

Yep he was compromised.

He was a bit confusing to me and really dumb as a rock. Several times he received information from the Russians on matters and then turned around and went in the wrong direction. He was not really to be trusted but a useful tool.

Can you imagine Brennan being taped and not have a clue. He needed to understand he was set up so in the future if a favor was needed he would cash a check for the other side.

TWITTER
maryprice
@marypri72202525

What is hilarious about this post is no one I've seen has said "you know, Brennan is the best in the business, he knows his stuff". All to a man have said he is a total idiot and worse. One former agent said he'd "do him for free" (whack) mostly because he was so stupid.

Not the same for Flynn or Rogers for example - the fence position determines whether good side smart or bad side.

TO BE READ and FOLLOWED BY ALL:

After a long conversation and consensus among Staff including Mods, Super Mods, Admins and Owners, we are posting the following reminders:

We don't want to shut the thread down or stifle debate.

The T&C must be followed by everyone.

PIZZAGATE, walnut sauce and any other type of PEDOPHILIA talk will not be tolerated. Those topics belong in RATS.

No Political Trolling.....either in words or images.

Forum gangs or the illusion of a special group will not be tolerated.
That includes "Q'ult" and Q team and similar references!!!

External material must be sourced.
Please see the DMCA policy page

Members are always responsible for their own posts.

STAY ON TOPIC!!!!!!!!! Quit the BICKERING!!!!!!!!

Members who repeatedly disregard the T&C may face temporary posting bans or permanent banning.


You are responsible for your own posts.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

edit on Sat Jun 1 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)

a reply to: cherokeetroy

I posted on Barr history a while back but mostly fell on deaf ears or more likely the speed of this thread some is simply missed.

Based on his history all need to be very cautious on his true purpose. He was hired by Bush Sr as a master 'Fixer' and convinced Clinton to pardon them all in the Iran-Contra cover-up and 10 years later had Marc Rich pardoned. There is a reason why he was brought out of the catacombs.
Alot of those old guard deep staters' go back to the 80's and DJT was not part of the club.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow


If Barr is Deep State...he missed his moment.
Why not receive the Mueller Report and say..."YUP...Obstruction of Justice!"?

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: cherokeetroy

I posted on Barr history a while back but mostly fell on deaf ears or more likely the speed of this thread some is simply missed.

Based on his history all need to be very cautious on his true purpose. He was hired by Bush Sr as a master 'Fixer' and convinced Clinton to pardon them all in the Iran-Contra cover-up and 10 years later had Marc Rich pardoned. There is a reason why he was brought out of the catacombs.
Alot of those old guard deep staters' go back to the 80's and DJT was not part of the club.

I'm just watching and waiting, trying not to speculate too much but I will say that if Barr drops the ball, if we end up with another 'nothingburger ' then he's going to bring this country to its knees. This level of corruption cannot sustain itself and I think (hope) that enough people are awake, now to clearly see through the b.s. and will resolutely say, 'we're not going to take this sht, anymore '

a reply to: crankyoldman

Not as much pomp as usual for a state visit cranky!

If the first meet was on horse guards parade, like most state visits, then he would probably have had a military tattoo ceremony.

Instead he gets the "garden party" treatment like the spinster from the village post office.

A little more archiving:
Mary Price on Iraq War:

If it matters Reagan flipped Gorbachev.
These two really wanted to save the world and when the Soviet Union crashed Clinton and his war machine messed it up. Reagan and Gorbachev saw Russia in NATO as a balance to China. Strange stuff
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was an interesting operation in Iraq after Saddam was killed. Both the Russians and Americans picked up that Saddam had stashed over 2 Billion in an Oasis in northern Iraq.

Both services worked together and retrieved over 2.5 Billion in cash.

It was quite the hoot sitting in a tent in the Desert counting out the spoils to both sides. Imagine a bit of it disappeared on both sides. Even I had a bit stashed to pay for later things.

The money on that table was not to be believed. Americans and Russians were so happy that day. We are all really deplorables.

TWITTER
maryprice
@marypri72202525

a reply to: IAMTAT

Sounds loosely like the plot of the movie Three Kings (good flick).

Ive been on Twitter interacting with Mary (Gina?) for the past couple of days. I’m still not sure what to think, but it’s definitely interesting. She says she’s in a mountain town in Nevada at a place called the Red Dog Saloon. She talks a lot about Roses (emphasis on the capital R). She’s speaking in codes sometimes.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

Not as much pomp as usual for a state visit cranky!

If the first meet was on horse guards parade, like most state visits, then he would probably have had a military tattoo ceremony.

Instead he gets the "garden party" treatment like the spinster from the village post office.

Hopefully someone will bring this post to the president's attention hahaha
What can he do but maybe wink and give the queen the ol Groucho eyebrows and hope she doesn't do a nosedive into the table blowing unseemly tea bubbles.
Ask for coffee in a mug? Keep looking at his watch. Adjust his gear... frequently. Stare at her nose.

originally posted by: Trillium
BOOM

Why Barr in Alaska 
[...]

www.adn.com...

Sounds to me that HRC might have had her first taste of the female variety during that summer. The Judge at the end of the article makes it seem like they had a sexual adventure while there (it wouldn't surprise me if it did happen, I remember being that age too)

Though this leads back to Sandi Servaas being off'd in 75. HRC had just been through her first courtroom action defending Thomas Alfred Taylor in his raping of Kathy Shelton. So Sandi's involvement with the free press at the time might have had something to do with this. As I understand it Sandi was a contributor to a historical magazine (or something), but what if she had sexually expletive photographs of her and HRC taken during their time in Alaska? Something like that would be very useful for anyone attempting to gain influence over her. At the time HRC had already marked herself as a legal "Rising Star".

Though I have to think that there could be more to this? HRC did work at Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, and as such was involved with at least tow known Communists at the time. Could the Break-in at Sandi Servaas's home have been an attempt by the FBI to get these possible photographs in an attempt to extort HRC into revealing any pro-Soviet activities she may have learned about during her internship at Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein? Could this be when and where she figured out how to weaponize governmental offices against her opponents? If it was I doubt she said anything since she would have blabbed about it to show how "Pro-American" she is, but then if she did have information and didn't reveal it, then does that mean she, like many others during the Obama Administration, is pro-communist?

I have personal insight into Hillary's bias toward women when it comes to bedroom choices, so it wouldn't surprise me one bit if she had her fun with Sandi Servaas. Frankly I didn't about it back in the 90's anymore than I care about it now. It's kind of like the Obama-Bi-sexual thing, if these political idiots would just open up about it, they would see that most of their followers don't care either. I also believe, based on first hand knowledge, that Hillary is a really sharp and intelligent person, but she is also very very lazy when it comes to following through on things. She's one of those people that will plan out a full event, but half-ass it then walk away before it gets done, only to later get pissed that it didn't go according to plan.

With that being said, I think we might need to look deeper at this story, and what came out of it. IS this what Barr is looking for, or is it something else? Who killed Sandi Servaas, was it HRC trying to protect herself, or was it the FBI trying to get something on a communist sympathizer?

funny seeing Comey projecting onto B Barr. what 'conspiracy theory 'is he alluding to, exactly ?

Bill Barr on CBS offers no facts. An AG should not be echoing conspiracy theories. He should gather facts and show them. That is what Justice is about.

twitter.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

I think it was clear from yesterday's CBS interview that William Barr is well-balanced. He does not really care what we want or what Democrats want. He wants to be viewed as taking appropriate action in u.s. history books.

There will still be arrests, but Unsealing 40000 indictments and filling gitmo up with deep State criminals does not seem to be William barr's style.

I think that is why Q has toned down his rhetoric as well, over the past three months.

a reply to: Tileman

Tileman, it's interesting that the Queen isnt going to the return dinner at the US ambassadors... sendin Prince Charles instead... bad form!

“Largest Foreign Bribery Case in History” Claims New Scalp: Former Pemex CEO

His lawyer suggests if the price is too high, he may be willing to take his friend, former president of Mexico, down with him.

Emilio Lozoya, a former chief executive of state oil company Petróleos Mexicanos (Pemex), was issued with an arrest warrant on Wednesday for financial irregularities, in particular his alleged dealings with scandal-plagued Brazilian construction firm Odebrecht.

wolfstreet.com...

Little threads getting pulled.

You just know this guy is likely connected to cartels NXIVM and US.gov officials too.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: IAMTAT

Sounds loosely like the plot of the movie Three Kings (good flick).

Ive been on Twitter interacting with Mary (Gina?) for the past couple of days. I’m still not sure what to think, but it’s definitely interesting. She says she’s in a mountain town in Nevada at a place called the Red Dog Saloon. She talks a lot about Roses (emphasis on the capital R). She’s speaking in codes sometimes.

Rosen is German for Roses. Rosen or Rosenstein?

a reply to: pteridine

Ok now that is interesting. She had talked about Rod recently, and at least one post highlighted two capital R’s at the beginning of a sentence ..I think you are right and she is speaking about Rosenstein.

Also she just said she has in her personal collection a tape of Sally Yates and John Brennan discussing how the Steele Dossier is completely fake. We asked her to post it, since it’s in her personal stash and all, but nothing yet. She has also said that the maryprice account is ran by more than 1 person.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: IAMTAT

I think it was clear from yesterday's CBS interview that William Barr is well-balanced. He does not really care what we want or what Democrats want. He wants to be viewed as taking appropriate action in u.s. history books.

There will still be arrests, but Unsealing 40000 indictments and filling gitmo up with deep State criminals does not seem to be William barr's style.

I think that is why Q has toned down his rhetoric as well, over the past three months.

William Barr doesn't care about what we want? That's too bad, considering the current theme seems to be returning power to the people. Well, I really don't care what William Barr wants. I don't care that he seems more concerned about upholding the laws of a corrupt system rather than offer truth, justice and full transparency to the American people (along with the entire planet). I expect him to do the right thing (by us). if he doesn't...too bad for him. Too bad for all of them