Bizarre Secret Files Released on Lost Ancient Human Civilizations

not sure if this is the good link The Adam And Eve Story The History Of Cataclysms (1993 Full UNCENSORED)

a reply to: 1point92AU

Don't get triggered.

Then stop posting BS and read what you are replying to in full.

BS like this

I asked for you to provide validation the book has been in the public realm for the length of time you say it has. That's all.

after saying I was making claims to which I asked you to quote so it can be explained, yet here you are again side stepping and like you said earlier to me deflecting.

If you have a genuine curiosity then its really easy to follow up on your interests,

asking repeated questions like

I've also asked for clarification on why the CIA would stamp a document as no longer being classified if it was never classified to begin with?

after replying to posts that were dedicated to explaining why, paints a pretty picture of what you are really doing and shows you have no interest in the subject.

Just want to be argumentative for idiotic reasons that if you were to really express them would get in trouble according the the Ts & Cs of ATS if reported.

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: 1point92AU

Don't get triggered.

Then stop posting BS and read what you are replying to in full.

BS like this

I asked for you to provide validation the book has been in the public realm for the length of time you say it has. That's all.

after saying I was making claims to which I asked you to quote so it can be explained, yet here you are again side stepping and like you said earlier to me deflecting.

If you have a genuine curiosity then its really easy to follow up on your interests,

asking repeated questions like

I've also asked for clarification on why the CIA would stamp a document as no longer being classified if it was never classified to begin with?

after replying to posts that were dedicated to explaining why, paints a pretty picture of what you are really doing and shows you have no interest in the subject.

Just want to be argumentative for idiotic reasons that if you were to really express them would get in trouble according the the Ts & Cs of ATS if reported.

You really are triggered. You were the one who originally jumped in on my response to Byrd asking him to explain how a document marked declassified was "never classified". That literally makes no sense.

You interjected with your condescending comments and when challenged you still cannot validate your claims which yes you continue to sidestep.

Either #walkaway or provide the evidence. I'm also still waiting to understand why the CIA declassifies material that was never classified to begin with.

a reply to: 1point92AU

I'm also still waiting to understand why the CIA declassifies material that was never classified to begin with.

You will most likely be waiting a long time then as if you can't understand what has already been patiently explained to you, you probably never will.

It's quite obvious the book was classified in order to prevent a few very gullible persons from reading it and actually thinking it made any sort of logical sense at all

a reply to: 1point92AU

You really are triggered.

Yes

do you have trouble reading where I said why am?

its right there in my post you quoted, did you not read it or again do have issues understanding.

If you are having issues understanding why certain things are said then quote the part you are having issues with,

like the claims you keep saying I made, quote the claim.

You were the one who originally jumped in on my response to Byrd asking him to explain how a document marked declassified was "never classified". That literally makes no sense.

then you have failed read

this is your issue, no on else's

its explained.

If it was classified then answer what ignorant_ape mentioned on the previous page, where are its classifications stamps if it was classified?

Talk about deflection, you simply ignore the parts of posts or posts that answer your questions.

You interjected with your condescending comments and when challenged you still cannot validate your claims which yes you continue to sidestep.

again

what claims did I make?

I have asked you what claims and am not side stepping anything like you are doing as I just said above, either whole posts are parts of post you ignore.

Its condescending to you because of how you interpret it.

I get now why you keep saying triggered, you were due to your inability to think so you need to play games to get others triggered, Yes, I am triggered by your ignorant repeated replies that have answered numerous times.

Oh an thank you for triggering me, it kills some time by replying to your nonsensical questions that are answered in the post by Byrd that you replied to and mention here.

Either #walkaway or provide the evidence.

What evidence?

WTF are you on about?

I'm also still waiting to understand why the CIA declassifies material that was never classified to begin with.

Good for you

others use their brains to do just some basic critical thinking , you being unable to is your issue.

a reply to: InhaleExhale

No amount of condescending comments can erase the fact you have failed repeatedly to provide the evidence to substantiate your claims. Time for you to #walkaway.

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: 1point92AU

I'm also still waiting to understand why the CIA declassifies material that was never classified to begin with.

You will most likely be waiting a long time then as if you can't understand what has already been patiently explained to you, you probably never will.

Where was it explained or verified? Point me to the CIA declassification regulations that state the CIA declassifies documents that were never classified. Unless it was buried in some post somewhere then I missed it.

You guys are taking this stuff personally and all I have requested was a verifiable source other than someone's opinion. So far all that has been presented here is opinion.

You guys are the ones arguing the CIA never classified the documents. I asked a simple question. If the documents were never classified then why put a declassification stamp on them?

I'm open to learning something new here.

originally posted by: 1point92AU
a reply to: InhaleExhale

No amount of condescending comments can erase the fact you have failed repeatedly to provide the evidence to substantiate your claims. Time for you to #walkaway.

I keep asking what claims have I made?

You mentioned I replied to you when you replied to Byrd's post

have you actually read it or just the first sentence and thought I was making claim, have you read any of the first 3 pages, I say no, hence why you replied to Byrd as you did, I take it you will keep playing this game of yours and wont address or quote anything and just keep repeating yourself.

If you think that was condescending because I say "good for you" because you think the poster Byrd was attempting to debunk the book when they weren't then you need work on your comprehension a little better or just read the thread in full.

If 5 pages is too much just start a page 3, everything you ask is answered.

a reply to: 1point92AU

I'm open to learning something new here.

I seriously doubt the veracity of that statement. Do stop twisting what has actually been said to you by others. It's plain to see that you are just trolling for an argument.

a reply to: 1point92AU

You guys are the ones arguing the CIA never classified the documents.

2 things tell us that

Both are in this thread

The document not being stamped with a classification, be it top secret or whatever secret classifications documents that are classified are stamped with,



and 2

the book being published in 93 and available to the public for purchase, available for libraries to hold.

Is that so hard to understand?

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: 1point92AU

You guys are the ones arguing the CIA never classified the documents.

2 things tell us that

Both are in this thread

The document not being stamped with a classification, be it top secret or whatever secret classifications documents that are classified are stamped with,



and 2

the book being published in 93 and available to the public for purchase, available for libraries to hold.

Is that so hard to understand?

I didn't see a post regarding the classification topic but that makes sense the way you phrased it. I understand the book was published in multiple editions at multiple times but I didn't equate that with these specific documents assuming they were removed from the other editions since they were a smaller number of a much larger publication.

That makes sense as well.

These threads can go off in so many different directions it's hard to see if someone posted something that validates certain claims. Thanks for the clarification.

EDIT: Do you have a link to the FOIA request? I've searched but cannot find how to locate the actual FOIA request.

originally posted by: All Seeing Eye

originally posted by: surfer_soul
a reply to: one4all

Mass migration by billions is easily possible you claim. To where exactly?

Millions escaping on massive GRANITE craft? Really?

I have theorized the first "flying" craft, were of stone. They do not rely on Air as the support. Think Magnetic levitation, MagLev.

The destination, is rather concerning. I keep thinking about "The Cookbook"...

You can theorize whatever the hell you want. That doesnt make it even remotely valid, accurate, or credible.

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: surfer_soul
a reply to: one4all

Mass migration by billions is easily possible you claim. To where exactly?

Millions escaping on massive GRANITE craft? Really? I have more faith of surviving a global catastrophe with a bug out bag, and I have no faith in that.

The stampedes on Black Friday tell me all I need to know about where humanity’s at.

Yes its possible...there are many Planets that we can live on.Well considering they suppressed David and ANY MANY others from teaching us how to use these technologies to build different types of Crafts..no I wouldn't count on it unless say an Elon Musk went ape-crap and built one. You will need a J-shaped underground shelter rmbedded 25 feet into the bedrock to go along with your BOB.

Please feel free to list some of those "many" planets, and feel free to explain how we are supposed to get there (and imaginary granite ships doesn't count). Those planets (pretending, momentarily, that they even exist) sure as heck arent in our galaxy, so how exactly do you propose to transplant billions of people, further than any single human has ever travelled before?

originally posted by: Maroboduus

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: surfer_soul
a reply to: one4all

Mass migration by billions is easily possible you claim. To where exactly?

Millions escaping on massive GRANITE craft? Really? I have more faith of surviving a global catastrophe with a bug out bag, and I have no faith in that.

The stampedes on Black Friday tell me all I need to know about where humanity’s at.

Yes its possible...there are many Planets that we can live on.Well considering they suppressed David and ANY MANY others from teaching us how to use these technologies to build different types of Crafts..no I wouldn't count on it unless say an Elon Musk went ape-crap and built one. You will need a J-shaped underground shelter rmbedded 25 feet into the bedrock to go along with your BOB.

Please feel free to list some of those "many" planets, and feel free to explain how we are supposed to get there (and imaginary granite ships doesn't count). Those planets (pretending, momentarily, that they even exist) sure as heck arent in our galaxy, so how exactly do you propose to transplant billions of people, further than any single human has ever travelled before?

I assume you meant Solar System there.

Harte

originally posted by: Memenquay
not sure if this is the good link The Adam And Eve Story The History Of Cataclysms (1993 Full UNCENSORED)

Actually i think a good banning point for the book was pages 54 to 63. Very very big anti-government rant. Good reason for a government to censor a book...

Also if you are American and anti-border wall and all for illegal immigration... then you shouldnt read page 62.... bwahhahah.

Democrats would hate page 62...

originally posted by: DaRAGE

Democrats would hate page 62...

OK, you got me

a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

This guy, Chan Thomas, which may be a pseudonym or pen name may have been an employee of the government and was responsible for researching these subjects.

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: IkNOwSTuff

This guy, Chan Thomas, which may be a pseudonym or pen name may have been an employee of the government and was responsible for researching these subjects.

Fascinating information Willtell

I think the fact USG was interested in these types of topics at all shows there is probably some credence to them. At the very least, they took/take them seriously enough to warrant in depth study and research

From MKULTRA, Grill Flame and some of the ancient civilizations/ancient knowledge topics.... the truth is out there