Having banned some guns/accessories & polygamy means we can also ban Sharia - RIGHT?

Banning some guns means we can ban some religious sects such as Sharia and polygamy

Being founded on the basis of "Freedom of religion and not allowing state/federal agencies to ban that practice of some religions" was one of the main goals of the US but we have seen things like polygamy within the old LDS and now the FLDS seems to be contradictory to the founding principles of the government.

What I want to know is why the US hasn't come out with an EXPLICIT ban in the practice of Sharia and some other "sects" of Islam. On top of that, I can see the argument of completely banning Islam as it isn't just a religion, it is an entire form of government much of which is in direct contradiction with the US constitution (like killing all infidels, polygamy, marrying children, etc. Why hasn't Islam received the same treatment as the early LDS church and the treatment of the FLDS church most recently?

If they are able to ban polygamy within the LDS, which arguably is illegal, then we should see the same treatment with non secular moslems and possibly all moslems.
Note, I'm not advocating any of this, I'm just making comparisons to what the constitution states and what has been done.

This also translates to guns and the selective banning of these weapons. If congress saw fit to ban polygamy, which was a religious right, they also saw fit to ignore the constitution and ban and restrict all kinds of guns & accessories. This action is along the same lines as banning polygamy. So are either of these legal? Are the people who have been oppressed by these laws lesser citizens than those who don't practice those religions or those who want to own a specific gun?

So since the gov can see fit to ban certain guns & accessories, when are they going to ban Sharia and guarantee that there will be absolutely NO "no-go zones" where law is upheld within the community and they ignore the law of the land.

Sorry for the lack of pithiness in this post & the last 1-2, I'm exhausted and it's been tough to finish some of these and finish a research paper I'm writing.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Cant ban Sharia because that'd be RACIST!!!!!!



But can ban various cultural aspects of such in terms of distinctions outside of this or that religion.

So one religion says bed persons of a certain age, well we've got bedding rules 'above' that. You like to stone people under mob rule, well we've got conduct rules in general 'above' that AND we dont do mob rule period.

Well no mob rule is supposed to be the idea anyways..........

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Sorry,

Leftest are only interested in negatively impacting Christians because they see Christians as the enemy.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Sharia is a form of law, it can only be implemented in a nation, state, province, etc where the population has accepted Islam into it's government. If a nation denounces any form of religion into it's government, Sharia or any form of religion cannot be banned to begin with, nor can be implemented. If it is, then the nations laws are either at risk, or (hopefully) went through a democratic process.

Sharia can't be banned per say, but it can't just be popped into existence into a nation where laws are already established. Even Iran notices it's fundamental flaws. But it would never happen in a nation like Canada, USA, England, etc. Existing laws prohibit it basically.

Islam actually does go hand and hand with controlling governments. Seperation of state and Islam is unusual. I think that some of the nuts in our country will allow Islam to take over, then the women will be bitching when all their rights are lost to men.

Maybe it would be better if men took complete control back like the Muslims do, maybe the women want that here in America since they are inviting Islam over here and Islam's first agenda is to spread Islam worldwide, deceiving people to accomplish this if necessary.

Hmmm. women actually want to be suppressed deep down, I never realized that.

I agree in part, saying it "can't" doesn't mean it doesn't happen. In Sweden and parts of the UK, there are Sharia zones where they take law into their own hands, possibly behind closed doors in the UK, but pretty openly known in Sweden. This is illegal in both of those countries, but it has still happened, by slowly chipping away at law enforcement's ability to respond and patrol these areas - now it's "Sharia" controlled/ruled. So by saying it isn't allowed, is like saying murder isnt' allowed, and then it starts happeneing (not related to this sharia, murder in general) and after awhile, punishments start to drop, there is less effort in finding the perpetrator and eventually you have people serving 30 days for murdering the guy down the block (yes i'm looking at YOU New Orleans!)

So ideally, if you said it can't happen. because it was largely illegal for the most part, it wouldnt' happen, but the fact is we are talking about reality where politicians will allow this stuff to continue and make excuses for it because it helps them get re-elected. It is treason, without doubt.

Agree on so many levels. I've thought about supporting Islam to get rid of 90% of these BS problems the libs have created over the last 20-40 years. feminism would be stomped into the ground, LGBTQHIV would go back to don't ask don't tell (like every hetero person does, why do so many need to make it so clear what they do in the bedroom when NO one cares, asks or wants to hear it - if that stopped, a lot of people would have a more faverable opinion of them). A woman telling others "that is my wife" like 40-50 times in a 1 hour span, gets really obnoxious and it is only to seek attention.

Another idea is to play along with Islam (not really convert) and then once traditional roles return, then fight the invaders.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

I'm not anti-Islam, or any religion for that matter.

But I am anti - religion in government or political and educational affairs.

I understand what you're saying, and no doubt it's happening somewhere on this planet, but can you provide some info or sources to your claims? I am interested, as this is a rather interesting topic to me, re-gentrification is something I am into right now.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

No there isn't stop believing everything you read.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

The answers you seek lie with your elected representatives. The ones you voted for.

They have the power to address these issues.

You should be asking them why they aren't doing something about this.

Some people are cowards tbh they have to be scared of people not like them.
I laugh at crap like this I live in Bradford full of Muslims and I have never had any trouble.

originally posted by: MyToxicTash
Some people are cowards tbh they have to be scared of people not like them.
I laugh at crap like this I live in Bradford full of Muslims and I have never had any trouble.

I don't think that is the issue, it seems to me that the hysteria is built as soundbites, the most vocal seem to be the ones that live vicariously through the media machine, they have never interacted with the people they fear, they have only heard about them.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Regulating guns is not the same thing as banning guns you big baby.

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: DigginFoTroof

Regulating guns is not the same thing as banning guns you big baby.

Would not regulating guns be an infringement of my rights to own one?

asking for a friend.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

My lord. We agree on something digging for nuggets.

They'll never ban sharia or actually apply logic to islam though. That would throw a wrench in their plan for homogenizing our culture out of existence.

a reply to: thedigirati

Is your right to own specific firearms guaranteed? Or just firearms.

Sharia law is already forbidden under the first amendment.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion........

Sharia is a bastardization of the church and state.

'Muricans built a wall between the two.

a reply to: DigginFoTroof

I agree with you. If guns or anything else is to be banned then Sharia law should be banned too. That is if there is any chance of it ever being effective anywhere and superseding our constitution or state laws, which it can't.

So, I understand people can fear such things and I don't blame you, we live in a fear based society. But, do you have any examples of Sharia law in USA? It being in effect and needing to be outlawed?

By the way, are you German? Germans say Moslem, in English it's Muslim. For English speakers, moslem is archaic and derogatory.

a reply to: neo96

It is a voluntary thing not backed up by any law in the UK. Jews have similar courts it is the choice of the person to use them or not.
They will never trump UK law nor US law.

originally posted by: MyToxicTash
Some people are cowards tbh they have to be scared of people not like them.
I laugh at crap like this I live in Bradford full of Muslims and I have never had any trouble.

We have some muslims around here that I know, they are decent people, they wanted to get away from the problems in the middle east so went through the work of coming here.

I heard through the grapevine, my daughters friends and our local TV station even interviewed a Muslim woman, that they do not want even the moderate Jihadists coming to this country. The woman on the news said it was nice that they finally have peace here and that many of the ones now seeking refuge are not peaceful people and they will eventually convert their young to be more radical and pushy and lead to turmoil between the Muslims and others here in America. They do not want that life, and with the wave of new not properly Vetted Muslims coming into this country we are going to make those Muslims who escaped their hell there have to return to hell over here.