Schumann Resonance higher than ever before

a reply to: LtFluffyCakes96

My friend was recently just at a bunch of psychics and they said we are going through big vibrational changes this year !
Not sure I believe psychics but yeh I can see how we may change if the resonance changes

I hope it brings us to peace ! and the new vibration raises our consciousness to levels of peace and compassion
instead of the low vibrational , egoic junk we have been wallowing in!

GOOD VIBRATIONS!

everyone think beach boys !

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ClovenSky

The A3 portion fits in with what you were stating.?

One hint would be the caption. It is showing a time series of changes in amplitude, not frequency.

I wonder what the difference is between A1 & A3?

A1 is the white trace, which represents the fundamental Schumann frequency of 7.83 Hz. A3 is the red trace, which represents the third order frequency of 20.8 Hz.

Amplitude, not frequency. It's showing how "loud" the signals on the various Schumann resonances got, not a change in frequency. For that, you want to look at figure 4 on that page.

As to what happened? There was some minor geomagnetic storming going on. The solar wind took a "south" turn. That might have something to do with it.

Excellent, thanks for the break down. It is so easy to allow our minds to wander to the extreme ends of what things mean. While forgetting the simple explanations often, as you know Phage, are the correct ones.

a reply to: LtFluffyCakes96

Average Amplitude had reached < 100 Hz

That makes no sense. Amplitude is not expressed in Hz.

Point is, we've never before in documented history, seen it spike like it did yesterday.

Never in history. That's quite a statement. You know this, how? Do you have access to archival data from that location? I'd love to have the link.


Do you know what that spectrum monitor is showing? Do you know the scale of signal strength which the colors represent? Do you know that there are other such monitors in other locations? Do you know what they showed at the time? Do you know that a quite sensitive instrument which is subject to local interference is used? Have you ruled out that possibility? Interesting that the noise (which is what it is, broadband noise) begins and ends at 12:00 noon local time. Don't you think?

a reply to: Phage

sosrff.tsu.ru...
Here's the site that I go to, you may need to translate it to English because it's in Russian, where I find all the Schumann Resonance data. I'm not a specialist on this, you do know that right? Just someone trying to learn a little and inform others in the process. My mistake if I misinterpreted some information by accident or not. You obviously know a lot about everything, but you don't have to be so bitter about it.

a reply to: LtFluffyCakes96

I'm not bitter, I just dislike the dissemination of ignorance. The blind leading the blind, as it were. And this is a classic case.

I am aware of that Tomsk website. Plugging it into Google Translate works quite well, but I can't seem to find the data archive.

I explained what another chart from that site shows. Allow me to explain what the spectrum monitor (the one that fascinates you) shows. It gives us three pieces of data. The horizontal axis is, of course, time. The vertical axis is frequency (with the scale on the left) and the colors represent amplitude expressed in dB. No key is provided for the color scale but it seems that it runs from blue at the lowest level to green, red, and white for the strongest signal.

So what we are seeing is an analysis of the strength of radio signals with frequencies between 0 and 40 Hz. Not discrete frequencies, a continous spectrum of that range of frequencies. Now, look at the parts of the display which are not overwhelmed by noise. See those bands at about 8 Hz, 13 Hz, and 20 Hz? Those are the first three of the Schuman resonance frequencies.Notice that the first has the strongest signal, the next is weaker, and the third is weaker still. Also notice that each signal is somewhat spread out, they cover a small range of frequencies not a specific frequency.

Now, notice that when the noise (whatever is causing it) cuts in, it covers the entire range from nearly 0 all the way to 40 Hz. That's called broadband noise because it covers a broad range of frequencies. The whole range became flooded between 12:00 noon and 12:00 noon (UTC). On, and off. That is a pretty good indication that some local source of interference came online and then offline.

Now, go to the display translated as "Electromagnetic Background Level." Here we see a much broader frequency range than the one which includes just the Schumann resonances. Notice that the same noise is affecting an extremely wide range of frequencies at the same time. Again, a strong indication that the source is from local interference or a problem with the equipment.

a reply to: Tarzan the apeman.

Thanks. I just notice in myself that I have been a little more jacked up than normal. Can feel my BP going up sometimes for no apparent reason lately.

My occupation is driving, I noticed people were more hyper last week. Usually the pattern that would be leading up to a long weekend and yet no holiday is near. Yeah something definitely is different.

a reply to: Phage

Again, a strong indication that the source is from local interference or a problem with the equipment.

What are you on about. I thought you considered yourself a scientist. If you where you would stick to objetive information. Not your imagination. You have no proof to back your axiom up do you.

Don’t try and conclude without information.

The truth of this issue is you dont know what you are talking about. The scientists dont know what its changing and you dont know the cause.





YOu

a reply to: Phage

Average Amplitude had reached < 100 Hz That makes no sense. Amplitude is not expressed in Hz.

I know what the poster is trying to say. Why be condescending.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LtFluffyCakes96

I'm not bitter, I just dislike the dissemination of ignorance. The blind leading the blind, as it were. And this is a classic case.

You could chalk it up to that if you'd like, but ignorance, sir, is not present within I, and I absolutely would not spread it, willingly.

I explained what another chart from that site shows. Allow me to explain what the spectrum monitor (the one that fascinates you) shows. It gives us three pieces of data. The horizontal axis is, of course, time. The vertical axis is frequency (with the scale on the left) and the colors represent amplitude expressed in dB. No key is provided for the color scale but it seems that it runs from blue at the lowest level to green, red, and white for the strongest signal.

So what we are seeing is an analysis of the strength of radio signals with frequencies between 0 and 40 Hz. Not discrete frequencies, a continous spectrum of that range of frequencies. Now, look at the parts of the display which are not overwhelmed by noise. See those bands at about 8 Hz, 13 Hz, and 20 Hz? Those are the first three of the Schuman resonance frequencies.Notice that the first has the strongest signal, the next is weaker, and the third is weaker still. Also notice that each signal is somewhat spread out, they cover a small range of frequencies not a specific frequency.

Now, notice that when the noise (whatever is causing it) cuts in, it covers the entire range from nearly 0 all the way to 40 Hz. That's called broadband noise because it covers a broad range of frequencies. The whole range became flooded between 12:00 noon and 12:00 noon (UTC). On, and off. That is a pretty good indication that some local source of interference came online and then offline.

Now, go to the display translated as "Electromagnetic Background Level." Here we see a much broader frequency range than the one which includes just the Schumann resonances. Notice that the same noise is affecting an extremely wide range of frequencies at the same time. Again, a strong indication that the source is from local interference or a problem with the equipment

Thank you for the in-depth explanation, honestly, now I know. On a side note, I found a few articles about all this stuff correlating to our solar system entering the 'Photon Belt'. It's worth the research if your willing. I'd make a pt. 2 to this thread with the info about it but I have a feeling you'd -phage that also.
Just joshin ya.

a reply to: purplemer

The truth of this issue is you dont know what you are talking about.

I know what the displays show. I know what things can influence the instruments.

The scientists dont know what its changing and you dont know the cause.

Which scientists?

I know what the poster is trying to say.

Yes, he said it in the OP.

Lately, the frequency has been breaking records, first time ever before reaching over 100 Hz.

a reply to: LtFluffyCakes96

The photon belt woo is still a thing?

a reply to: Phage

I know what the displays show. I know what things can influence the instruments.

That is not the case. You have a limited understand and some of the things that may effect the instrument in certain conditions.


Trot on with that waffle.

a reply to: purplemer

That's what I said. I know what things can influence the instruments.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LtFluffyCakes96

The photon belt woowoo is still a thing?

I guess, I didn't know it was a "thing" in the past.

Trot on with that waffle.

That sh!t made my day.

a reply to: LtFluffyCakes96

but ignorance, sir, is not present within I,

My apologies.

You seemed to be ignorant of what the spectrum monitor displays. You seemed to be ignorant of the difference between frequency and amplitude.

a reply to: Phage

I know what the displays show. I know what things can influence the instruments.

No you do not what things can influence the instrument. The effect of this could well be without your remit of understanding in its entirety.

I didnt hear you saying that.

a reply to: purplemer

I know that broadband interference can be produced locally. Better?

Unfortunately, there does not seem to be any contact information for the Tomsk facility so you can speculate all you wish about what caused the noise.

Maybe it was HAARP.

Or the photon belt.

Or sylphs.

a reply to: LtFluffyCakes96

IMO all of this is tied to not only the new region of the local fluff we are entering, but it also has to do with the increased energy we are receiving from outside the Solar System.

Stratospheric Radiation on Earth Continues to Increase.

Cosmic Rays, especially X-Rays, The Solar System is Receiving Have been Increasing

Certain people keep ignoring that Earth is not the only planet in the Solar System experiencing warming/drastic climate change.

Pluto is alive—but where is the heat coming from?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LtFluffyCakes96

I'm not bitter, I just dislike the dissemination of ignorance. The blind leading the blind, as it were. And this is a classic case.
...

So you hate yourself. We get it Phage.