It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
This thread poses an interesting question.
All the attacks that have happened on public property that have been made into "gun free safe spaces" should be liable for the injured. The law-abiding people that had been injured or killed in those areas were not able to defend themselves legally and the state that designated those areas were negligent in making those areas "safe".
I would like to see this tested in court.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Krakatoa
Deliberately spreading an infectious disease is an infringement.
To the offended, wearing a hat with MAGA on it, is deliberately spreading hate and infringement to them.
originally posted by: BoscoMoney
If someone wants to hurt or kill you, what difference will a safe space make? So what else would it be for? Because you dont like what someone is wearing? What someone is saying? Jesus H man, if youre so offended by society, its time to get your head checked. I didnt get safe spaces when I grew up, and guess what, nor should anyone else. If I want a safe space I go to my house, bedroom, out in the middle of no-where where no one else is around. I dont freak out because someone said something I dont like and immediately think, OMGOMGOMG where is mah safe space?!?!?! Come on already.