It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
No because they spout easily debunked anti vaxxer bull#.
As opposed to the easily debunked pro-vaxxer bull#?
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
Your personal freedom ends when it encroaches onto others....
Correct... and your personal freedom to be pro-vaxx ends at my personal freedom to not be forced to be injected with toxic bull# that your religion believes is safe and effective in spite of reams of evidence to the contrary.
originally posted by: projectvxn
Oooh you got me there with that sick, unverifiable, burn!
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
You are more likely to be hit by lightning than you are from suffering an adverse effect from a vaccine.
Measles has an infection rate of 90% for those not vaccinated.
originally posted by: projectvxn
Post that evidence. You say reams but all you have are repeatedly discredited claims and repeatedly discredited quacks making them.
originally posted by: projectvxn
Communicable disease is no ones right to spread.
originally posted by: Extorris
States can not force or mandate vaccines and should not be permitted to. It will never happen and is a silly discussion.
Schools and other places where large numbers of kids are brought together daily have a right to exclude kids that would put entire populations at risk.
That is a straw man argument. Vaccinations are not 100% effective.
Still waiting for someone, anyone, to make a legitimate argument about how an unvaccinated child threatens your vaccinated child, if the vaccinations are so effective.
Like doctor's offices?
In those cases, the onus is on that person (or the caregiver for that person) to protect them by not taking them out into public places
originally posted by: projectvxn
Those who have not yet been vaccinated depend on herd immunity
It's the same principle. Except that, through vaccination, immunity is provided to those who never contract the potentially fatal or debilitating disease. Higher number of immune people = lower risk of infection = lower risk for all. Simple equation.
Sorry, but 'Herd Immunity' is a myth, when applied to vaccinated populations.
It was formulated based on observations in communities where more than half the people had been infected with a disease and developed natural, lifelong immunity to it, like one does with measles or chicken pox.
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
Then don't participate in society.
My sister has ulcerative colitis which means her immune system is always engaged and therefore weak.
Your right to carry a preventable disease does not trump her right to be able to just exist safely.
When I get vaccinated I'm not just doing it for myself but for everyone else who can't. Those who don't get vaccinated for any reason other than legitimate medical reasons are the most selfish people. You arrogantly want to introduce and transmit highly infectious illnesses that shouldn't even exist anymore! It is utter bonkers.
originally posted by: Phage
Vaccinations are not 100% effective.
Like doctor's offices?
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: rickymouse
You do realize that if they are allowed to force vaccines by a majority vote, they can possibly use that as precedence to sterilize men and women to control the population. Both men and women can be done with a single injection.
Think about that, precedence is used a lot in this country.
The single biggest reason I am against vaccines is I simply do not trust the pharmaceutical/medical/governmental/industrial complex.
How many times has the government gotten caught experimenting on unsuspecting groups or even entire populations?
Not really. Not enough to change the equation.
Exactly, Not only that, some people who get vaccinated, get the actual disease from the vaccination.
Better to stay home, untreated. I guess.
Why on earth would anyone take someone who has serious immune system problems to a place that is known to be swimming with diseases?
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: rickymouse
Once you get the flu, you get immunity to it for life usually. Your immune system knows how to fight it even if it mutates a little bit.
Sorry? I know this is true for certain diseases, like chicken pox and measles... but the flu?
I don't think that is right.