It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: JDmOKI
Then you should be arguing for stricter antitrust laws. Not trying to argue that the government should target one specific company because they took advantage of the rules.
Did you have any problem when Walmart refused to sell music because of its content? Did the government need to step in and make them sell NWA's Straight Outta Compton?
So, I was walking through Chicago and I saw that there was a "Muslim Book Store." I was wondering what exactly was in a Muslim bookstore, so I went in.
As... I was wandering around taking a look, the clerk stopped me and asked if he could help me.
I imagine I didn't look like his normal clientele, so I asked, “Do you have a copy of Donald Trump's book on his U.S. Immigration Policy regarding Muslims and illegal Mexicans?"
The clerk said, "GET OUT!, GET OUT AND STAY OUT!"
I said, "Yes, that's the one. Do you have it in paperback?"
originally posted by: Mandroid7
I can't stand the bs "free to do what they want, they are private" statements with corporations.
These companies ALL have revolving door spooks in them, if not outright started by them. (Lifelog to Facebook same day)
Even if not started by the gov, there are no anti trust protection for us.
They have completely neutered small business.
They have completely circumvented the constitution. (Alexa etc...)
Shut 'em down. All of them.
Techno commies.
originally posted by: Butterfinger
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: gallop
What I see going on is people that religiously defend the Constitution and are very opposed to government regulation demanding that the government step in and prevent a business from operating how they see fit.
I'm hoping for; if you dont sell one offense, then you dont sell the opposing nonsense either.
Used to be a red flag on what a retailer supports and doesnt. Thats the point here
originally posted by: AtlasHawk
a reply to: schuyler
People defending Amazon decision to ban Tommy Robinson’s Book here is rather ironic at best.
originally posted by: crayzeed
Let me give you all a small bit of info you probably don't know. Question, where does the modern Koran come from?
Well virtually ALL the Korans the run of the mill Muslim waves about comes from the early 1900s. Do you believe it when they say their book comes from 900s. Naah.
There were many versions of the Koran floating about with different writings so the got a few Islamic scholars in Cairo, I think, and the rewrote the whole book, putting things in and taking things out. Google is your friend.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
You mean wee Steve the junkie the whose been sent to prison after assaulting a police officer who was preventing him form beating on his girlfriend then was sent down for drugs offences and recently boasted that he can score gear any where while asking for a "little paki" who drives a car....he recently was on camera just punching a guy in the face after he wound him up. Thats not even his whole rap sheet we could add to that mortgage fraud and contempt of court.
Wee Stevie is a total scum bag.
I saw the stuff he made about the BBC and it doesn't really amount to much.
I really do think that people need to look into who Tommy Robinson actually is before supporting him, he is not a nice guy, he is not the kind of guy I really do think that most decent folk would want to side with.
Ohhh also you're source is wrong, Tommy has not been banned from YouTube, YouTube defends decision to keep Tommy Robinson on its site . Now if Amazon chose not to see his book thats up to them, its not censorship its just their decision if they feel that selling his products through there site is going to hurt their brand. I mean he is still free to see his book through other avenues if he wants.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: Jay-morris
Let’s say less than 5% of the population is somehow a Muslim problem, you still don’t need to back someone like wee stevie.
Also I never actually used the word racist...actually went through and double checked I have not used the word racist once in this thread. Bit of a straw man argument you’re using these buddy
But you look up the UK legal definition of race, might find it enlightening.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: Jay-morris
Again, you said I had called him a racist, yet unti my last response to you I haven’t even used to word racist.
And again please read up on how race is defined in the UK
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: Jay-morris
Sorry I think you might be a bit confused. You are the only one talking about race
This thread is about amazon refusing to sell his book.
I mean, no I don’t think it’s right for anyone to promote violence in the name of any ideology but that’s got naff all to do what the topic at hand.
This thread is about amazon refusing to sell his book. I mean, no I don’t think it’s right for anyone to promote violence in the name of any ideology but that’s got naff all to do what the topic at hand.
You mean wee Steve the junkie the whose been sent to prison after assaulting a police officer who was preventing him form beating on his girlfriend then was sent down for drugs offences and recently boasted that he can score gear any where while asking for a "little paki" who drives a car....he recently was on camera just punching a guy in the face after he wound him up. Thats not even his whole rap sheet we could add to that mortgage fraud and contempt of court. Wee Stevie is a total scum bag.