It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well; in this day and age it does not take much imagine whats he's going down for.
About time the rule of law and justice caught up these scum bags who fidde with kids.
But please; don't take my word, read it here.
What is the wider context of this story?
Countries around the world have been holding inquiries into institutional child sexual abuse. In 2012, Australia’s then prime minister, Julia Gillard, ordered a formal inquiry into historical child sexual abuse within Australian institutions, with the Catholic church and its associated organisations coming under particular scrutiny.
Pell was one of hundreds of people summoned to give evidence during public hearings held throughout Australia. He gave evidence to the commission in person and via videolink, and was questioned about the structure of the archdiocese of Melbourne.
There had been no suggestion in these commission hearings that Pell was a perpetrator.
The commission asked questions about whether he knew of any abuse and what he did to address it. This is because in 1996, while Pell was archbishop of Melbourne, he was approached by senior politicians, judges and officials who raised concerns about historical child sexual abuse by clergy and church personnel.
More complainants were coming forward with their stories and historical charges were being laid. As a result, Pell established a scheme within the archdiocese of Melbourne to investigate such claims.
This initiative was known as the Melbourne Response, and those in charge of it, including Pell, have been criticised by complainants for an inconsistent and inadequate response to claims.
Pell also faced questioning by the royal commission about how the archdiocese of Melbourne responded to and investigated allegations of child sexual abuse within its institutions.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Azureblue
He was convicted months ago and only now are they reporting it, 3rd highest member of the Catholic Church worldwide and the treasurer for the Vatican, this is pretty big news.
His arrest and subsequent court case was suppressed in Australia.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Azureblue
Found guilty
could now face a sentence of between 10 and 14 years.
could should would - lets wait and see the actual sentencing.
All in all a good result
not even the vatican's best can protect anyone in the church from such charges anymore. The precedent has been set,
The charges were served on Pell’s legal representatives in Melbourne on Thursday and they have been lodged also at Melbourne magistrates court. He has been ordered to appear at the court on 26 July.
originally posted by: JohnnyJetson
a reply to: Azureblue
His arrest and subsequent court case was suppressed in Australia.
what makes you say that? e.g.
the 77-year-old treasurer for the Vatican could now face a sentence of between 10 and 14 years.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
the 77-year-old treasurer for the Vatican could now face a sentence of between 10 and 14 years.
Could...humm I wonder will he stay in a luxury prison a few months and quietly be released.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
You don't find the story of the plaintiff credible, you understand that is one of the reasons why a very small percentage of victims actually come forward and testify, they are given the third-degree and accused of lying.