It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth
Since neither of them could invoke the 25th I'd call it a discussion..... You do know that it didn't happen right?
Pence didn't do it and it was never put up for a vote amongst the cabinet.
Dont ever ask why they thought something like this might be necessary... never ask the hard questions.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth
Since neither of them could invoke the 25th I'd call it a discussion..... You do know that it didn't happen right?
Pence didn't do it and it was never put up for a vote amongst the cabinet.
Dont ever ask why they thought something like this might be necessary... never ask the hard questions.
McCabe and Rosenstein have both confirmed the conversations. The only question is whether Rosenstein was 'joking'. That old chestnut whenever a Democrat is caught red handed. They tried to work through whether they could make a case to Pence and get 8 cabinet members but alas for them they had no chance, because there was never any basis. Nowhere in the 25th Amendment does it say ' The President can be removed on the grounds of severe buthurt of those that don't like him'.
originally posted by: MadLad
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth
Since neither of them could invoke the 25th I'd call it a discussion..... You do know that it didn't happen right?
Pence didn't do it and it was never put up for a vote amongst the cabinet.
Dont ever ask why they thought something like this might be necessary... never ask the hard questions.
McCabe and Rosenstein have both confirmed the conversations. The only question is whether Rosenstein was 'joking'. That old chestnut whenever a Democrat is caught red handed. They tried to work through whether they could make a case to Pence and get 8 cabinet members but alas for them they had no chance, because there was never any basis. Nowhere in the 25th Amendment does it say ' The President can be removed on the grounds of severe buthurt of those that don't like him'.
And what about the memo from Rosenstein to Trump suggesting Trump fire Comey, and then immediately after, Rosenstein starts a secret obstruction of justice investigation on Trump for firing Comey? That reeks of entrapment or something like it. There is some shady business going on that cannot be reduced to blind stupidity and incompetence.
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Gandalf77
WTF would you call it when the head of the FBI and the head of the DoJ have a meeting to discuss how to get recordings of Trump so they can build a case for invoking the 25th amendment - based on nothing more than a desire to have him removed??? Or senior FBI officials meeting to discuss 'insurance policies' if Trump is elected.
You are correct in one regard, many of the deep state are no longer deep - they are out in the open.
Well, that begs the question...what if it does? What if it is proven that he and/or his campaign team used illegal means to gain the presidency? What then? I'm not saying that will happen, I'm just saying that it's a possibility. Everything is still a possibility, to rule anything out is foolhardy at best.
according to people familiar with the plans.
It looks like as if the report will be sent in summary format to Congress. Not clear what the public will see.
The Russians interefered There is no evidence of collusion Trump campaign members were naive, but not conspiring.
originally posted by: narrator
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: UKTruth
This part was funny to me:
But with President Donald Trump soon to travel overseas for a summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Justice officials are mindful of not interfering with the White House's diplomatic efforts, which could impact the timing.
That's CNN suggesting that the Mueller report will actually look bad for Trump. 🤣😅
Well, that begs the question...what if it does?
What if it is proven that he and/or his campaign team used illegal means to gain the presidency? What then?
I'm not saying that will happen, I'm just saying that it's a possibility. Everything is still a possibility, to rule anything out is foolhardy at best.
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
this is going to be one anticlimactic event, for both the right and left
The President has been sitting on a stack of classified material that has the potential to "bring down the House".