It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
The archaeological record for the Israelites during that time period is a problem.
I guess it all comes down to a question of dating when the Exodus from Egypt occurred. Since the Bible mentions the Israelities building store houses for Rameses, people (scholars, archaeologists) assume that the Exodus occurred under that pharoah. So people have been looking for evidence of the Israelities in the archaeological layers of time using that Pharoah as a marker. And they don't find anything.
But apparently if you move the date of the exodus to 200 years earlier, a bunch of stuff adds up and corresponds to the biblical narrative.
Michael Heiser is currently doing a series on Exodus, and his first three episodes focus on the problems for the dating of the Israelities history based on the time of the exodus. It's called the Naked Bible Podcast and you can find it on iTunes.
There's also an archaeologist named David Rohl who has matched up a lot of archaeology to the bible by moving the assumed date of the exodus to 200 years prior to what the experts have been looking for, and he shows how well everything matches up (including the fall of Jericho) when you move the date. His stuff can be found on YouTube.
Basically, it's all a mess, and depends on when you date the Exodus from Egypt.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: DpatC
My belief is that some of the stories told in the bible are really retellings of events that took place much much earlier than the time period given.
Maybe even to different people entirely.
Joshua taking down castle walls using sound may be one of those older tails.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: DpatC
My belief is that some of the stories told in the bible are really retellings of events that took place much much earlier than the time period given.
Maybe even to different people entirely.
Joshua taking down castle walls using sound may be one of those older tails.
The part of the interpretation of the king's dream has parallels to the biblical story of Joseph, the part about the letter with the carrier's death sentence has parallels to the Greek story of Bellerophon and the biblical story of Uriah
Similarities between the Sargon Birth Legend and other infant birth exposures in ancient literature, including Moses, Karna, and Oedipus, were noted by psychoanalyst Otto Rank in 1909.[48] The legend was also studied in detail by Brian Lewis, and compared with a number of different examples of the infant birth exposure motif found in European and Asian folk tales. He discusses a possible archetype form, giving particular attention to the Sargon legend and the account of the birth of Moses.[6] Joseph Campbell has also made such comparisons
Sargon is also one of the many suggestions for the identity or inspiration for the biblical Nimrod. Ewing William (1910) suggested Sargon based on his unification of the Babylonians and the Neo-Assyrian birth legend.[50] Yigal Levin (2002) suggested that Nimrod was a recollection of Sargon and of his grandson Naram-Sin, with the name "Nimrod" derived from the latter