So, someone dug up the Virginia abortion governor's yearbook...

originally posted by: toolgal462
Anyone see the short video clip of this fool ignoring the black man attempting to shake his hand?

The guy is trash.

THIS?
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT
Yes, that's the one. Tell me there aint something wrong with that man?

How and why did Democrats allow this guy to run?

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: IAMTAT
Yes, that's the one. Tell me there aint something wrong with that man?

How and why did Democrats allow this guy to run?

I think he's likely a complete fraud, liar and a hypocrite...but I didn't vote for him.
The good Democrats of VA chose this guy...they're responsible for his being there.

ALSO...$2M from Planned Parenthood helped put him there too.

Seriously, does anyone think this guy won a Michael Jackson dance competition?

originally posted by: pavil
Seriously, does anyone think this guy won a Michael Jackson dance competition?

Doing it in blackface probably clinched it for him.

BTW...Why does he think he gets a pass on that?

originally posted by: pavil


Seriously, does anyone think this guy won a Michael Jackson dance competition?

Maybe at the KKK talent show...

originally posted by: ker2010

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SeaWorthy

s I am just asking what anyone should ask why is this such a big deal. It was college, drunk party days.

Its not a big deal unless a Republican does it.

I am so glad I have zero interest in political parties!

originally posted by: StallionDuck

originally posted by: ker2010

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SeaWorthy

s I am just asking what anyone should ask why is this such a big deal. It was college, drunk party days.

Its not a big deal unless a Republican does it.

According to CNN, he IS a republican... lol


Just goes to show you... There are no longer any excuses or exceptions. If you do something dumb when you're 18, expect to live with it destroying your life for the REST of your life.

Gotta love this!

Is this what we wanted? No? Too bad... Can't take it back now. What will be offensive tomorrow may not be offensive today. That means we're probably all screwed.

yeah throw out Tom sawyer and a whole lot of stuff, even epics like Gone with the Wind.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: xuenchen
LOL

Northam says it was a Michael Jackson costume.

How many stories i.e. excuses so far .... ? 🤣

No he said he remembers doing MJ that was not the time in the picture it was a dance contest.

Oh shurrrrrrr lol 🤣

I really tried to picture this and I just could not do it! lol!

Guy painted black and moonwalking maybe!

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Clearly time-travelling Republicans went back in time to when the yearbook editor was assembling the yearbook and snuck that photo onto his page.

I am pretty sure it happened.

originally posted by: ker2010

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SeaWorthy

s I am just asking what anyone should ask why is this such a big deal. It was college, drunk party days.

Its not a big deal unless a Republican does it.

Yeah, Republicans are always the poor little victims.

So, how long ago is long enough, I wonder?

This is getting beyond stupid.

a reply to: seagull

Well, they went back to high school to smear Kav as a drinker. I have to imagine there would be no statute of limitations for a drinker who dared wear black makeup in a gross Klan gag.

If rules were rules, and we weren't just weaponizing outrage, of course.



I suspect it will gradually stop getting mentioned because the machine tends to take care of its own, and creating the right to comfortably hold a delivered black baby girl in stasis while you decide whether to kill her or not (in the name of women's rights, of course) is more important to them than the opportunity to be offended by stupid Klansmen/blackface like the forgetful ol' Coonman did is.

a reply to: SeaWorthy

Yeah, maybe he would have been better off using the democrats default and blame all of this on the Russians, walk away and call it a day?

a reply to: RadioRobert

I know, that was completely out of bounds. ...and I said so many times.

Here's what I don't understand.
The yearbook editor's name and whatever staff was involved would have their names listed in the book itself.

With so much riding on this and with all the media attention and organizations that have a stake in this story...WHY hasn't the yearbook staff/editor been tracked down by now and questioned about the photo?

a reply to: IAMTAT

If they answer the phone they'll have to explain why they chose to include Klansmen/blackface in the yearbook as they held editorial power.

Plus, they may want to lineup their story with whatever the official narrative is going to be moving forward first.

originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: IAMTAT

If they answer the phone they'll have to explain why they chose to include Klansmen/blackface in the yearbook as they held editorial power.

Plus, they may want to lineup their story with whatever the official narrative is going to be moving forward first.

Possible.
OR...they've already been questioned and the answer wouldn't be helpful to Northam.

My 2 cents...this entire black-face pic is to distract from focusing on the PP issue and discussion of late term abortion on demand.

Look over there, not over here.

Second thing bothering me...WHY would Northam even bring up the Michael Jackson blackface story...since it wasn't even on the radar?