CONFIRMED: Hillary Camp Set Up Trump Tower Meeting Between Russians and Don Jr.

So...let me make sure I understand this correctly:

The Clinton campaign coordinated a meeting between the Trump campaign and the Russian government (by way of using a Russian agent who has been connected with the GOP, the NRA, etc.), even going so far as getting Don Jr. to say, 'if it is what you say it is, I love it!'

This was all done by the Clinton campaign to paint the Trump campaign as 'colluding with Russia' before the election in some sort of attempt to do what, exactly? Claim malfeasance after they lost the election? I, genuinely, don't believe anyone in the Clinton campaign expected to lose. Even Donald Trump was shocked (and disappointed) that he won.

Is that right? Future-president Clinton had the intention of setting up Donald Trump to throw him in prison, or something, before the campaign because...why?

a reply to: links234

cause they are running an organized crime syndicate and Donald Trump didn't go through their rituals to get in.

He knows the crimes they've committed and they are afraid their crime spree is going to come to an end.

The World needs more Vigilantes.

a reply to: Xcathdra

So it is confirmed that one guy says it is likely? That is confirmed for you fools now??? Gee wilikers...

You guys are just a joke anymore....

a reply to: links234

Only idiots, or socialist globalists, would at this stage claim there was no collusion between Clinton/the DNC, fusion GPS, a foreign spy who stated he would do everything to depose POTUS Trump, or stop him from becoming President...and that foreign spy used his RUSSIAN contacts who made false claims and then was used against Trump...

Fools, and socialist globalists are the only ones who claim "Trump Russia collusion..."

a reply to: links234

This was all done by the Clinton campaign to paint the Trump campaign as 'colluding with Russia' before the election in some sort of attempt to do what, exactly? Claim malfeasance after they lost the election?

Yes.

I, genuinely, don't believe anyone in the Clinton campaign expected to lose.

That's why Peter Strzok and Lisa Page called the operation their "insurance policy". They didn't believe it would happen either, but wanted something to fall back on in the unlikely event that it might happen.

a reply to: headorheart

No one interfered in anyone's election. It wasn't "Clinton's" election. They, as the reports indicate, were attempting to sow discord and de-legitimize our system. Mission accomplished, thanks to the loose lipped bandwagon hitchers.

Every single time leftist garbage accused Trump of "collusion"/treason/XXX they played right into the hands of America's enemies: Who are far more numerous than simply Russia.

This standard intelligence practice of election "meddling," intelligence gathering, misinformation, propaganda is nothing new. It's been going on for well over 100 years and won't stop any time soon. The digital revolution has simply made that information more available through fewer filters and among the anti-Trump TDS left, they found a ready/willing/able host to spread their virulent lies and campaign of distrust/division.

I hate to break this to you, but Democrats invented the "Russia bot" narrative. Even with their own self-described "false flag" to go along with it (in true Dem fashion). There is no proof any DNC documents were "hacked" and we have nothing but a private company the DNC paid for to go on. The Feds Never examined the server themselves

I won't go into the laundry list debunking the left for the millionth time, but its out there if you want to search my post history (about 5 posts ago)

a reply to: Deetermined

I firmly believe those involved in demonstrable conspiracy should be charged with treason, and if found guilty, suffer death as the only Constitutionally defined crime against the United States explicitly calls for.

a reply to: vinifalou
Even if Hillary schemed the people in the Trump Tower meeting. She what? Somehow convinced all the higher ups of a presidential campaign to take a meeting with dubious Russian people?

Are you people retarded? Wtf happened to conservatives? There is no greater example of personal responsibility than this meeting? They took a meeting they shouldn’t have.

Wether Hillary Clinton had anything to do with it is a moot point. U ppl r morons

originally posted by: headorheart
She set up the meeting to interfere with her own election? Give me a break.

Also LIKELY is not a synonym for CONFIRMED.

So she can have dirt on the trump and Russians colluding.

She can say see. I have proof they met. Why. Because i set it.up

.

Imagine if I put up an anti Donnie thread using "gatewaypundit" (lol) and a "likely" (aka we have no proof) conclusion. You'd all be crying fake news and saying how unfair everyone is to poor Donnie.

Also, let's say it is correct.

If I trap a paedophile over the internet, by pretending to be a child who wants to have sex, and he comes to meet me? He's still a paedophile. He just got caught.

Double

gateway pundit is fake news

Now we wait and see where this end up. LOL or Hoax

originally posted by: GokuVsSuperman0
a reply to: vinifalou
Even if Hillary schemed the people in the Trump Tower meeting. She what? Somehow convinced all the higher ups of a presidential campaign to take a meeting with dubious Russian people?

Are you people retarded? Wtf happened to conservatives? There is no greater example of personal responsibility than this meeting? They took a meeting they shouldn’t have.

Wether Hillary Clinton had anything to do with it is a moot point. U ppl r morons

Like using a pretext to get the meeting only to change plans at the meeting? Which is what happened.

originally posted by: Theyy
gateway pundit is fake news

Then you should have no problems refuting the information.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Visiting ATS for the first time in a while. It didn't take me long to realize why I stopped in the first place. This forum has become the online version of the movie "Idiocracy." There used to be interesting conversations and interesting topics to make you wonder. Now it's nothing but crazy people that think Democrats are evil, LITERALLY EVIL, and how everything is either an agenda to bring Trump down or how great he is. It's actually quite amazing to watch how so many people are actually brainwashed.

But anyway, the site's IQ level has seemed to decrease so drastically that you guys don't even use real sources anymore. Just about every thread I've clicked on since visiting has been from this Gateway Pundit. They never give any real details. It's always just a vague and ambiguous article with a attention-grabbing headline.

originally posted by: Deetermined
Yes.

Why? That's what I can't get out of this conspiracy theory. Why would Clinton (or her camp) decide to do all of these things? If it was an 'insurance policy' then it's performing very poorly as we're already half way through Trump's first term.

It seems much more plausible, to me, that the simplest answer is the correct one (Occam's razor): Trump's team worked closely with Russian oligarch's (possibly at the direction of Putin) to make Trump, and the Russians, more wealthy throughout the campaign with the expectation that, if he won, he would be a better ally towards Russia's interests than Clinton would be.

We've even got evidence of this answer through what we know from the Mueller investigation; 34 people, 3 companies indicted with some of them going to prison or pleading guilty or actively working with the investigation to get lighter sentences. It's still going too, despite what the hot tub salesman would have you believe, the Mueller investigation is on-going and there's no reason to believe it will be over soon.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454
So, who let the Russian woman in? And why?

I don't think they let her in without knowing her intentions, let alone her itinerary. Who had that power at that time?

*Jeopardy theme plays*

In October 2015 it was the DOJ:

Denied a visa, a frustrated Veselnitskaya was eventually able to secure permission from the Justice Department to enter the country outside the normal visa process under a designation known as "immigration parole," court records show.

In October 2015, Veselnitskaya represented Denis Katsyv in a money laundering suit against his company, Prevezon. The U.S. government had accused Katsyv of using $230 million in stolen funds to buy real estate. Veselnitskaya's application for a visa to travel to the U.S. to work on the case was denied, she said in a later court filing.

Why did Obama's DOJ let Natalia Veselnitskaya into U.S.? - CBS News

Then in June 2016, it was the State Department:

Veselnitskaya obtained a visa from the State Department to enter the country in June 2016, according to a government filing last week. The filing, which came in response to a new request by Veselnitskaya to be allowed into the U.S. for a Nov. 9 hearing in the now-settled Prevezon case, cited a Fox News report from last July.

The Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office did not disclose in the filing whether it independently confirmed that the State Department issued a visa to Veselnitskaya to allow to her attend the 2nd Circuit argument in June 2016.

How did Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya get into U.S. for Trump Tower meeting? - Reuters

a reply to: Xcathdra

Who knew "likely" means "confirmed"

And don't anyone dare confuse the statement above for some kind of like or regard for any Clinton