It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Krakatoa
Convicted criminals spill the dirt on associates all the time, simply because their desperate to avoid a prison sentence.
It actually makes more "common sense" that she was putting all her cards on the table by telling the truth, when facing a lengthy prison sentence in Thailand... But now is just backtracking in an attempt to avoid the consequences of 'running her mouth'.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: UKTruth
You do realize your doing the exact same thing your accusing me of, right?
Or maybe the irony is completely lost on you.
"Basically, you will believe anything as long as it feeds your irrational" infatuation "of [the] POTUS."
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: UKTruth
Why do you consider her claims back then as 'not credible'... yet consider her claims now as obvious truth?
What possible motive does she have to publicly state she was lying? Other than toeing the line.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: UKTruth
Why do you consider her claims back then as 'not credible'... yet consider her claims now as obvious truth?
What possible motive does she have to publicly state she was lying? Other than toeing the line.
She isn't making a claim now. She is admitting her previous claim was false.
She got what she wanted - no need to continue the lie and face questioning from those on a witch hunt in Washington.
I know it must be frustrating for you to have another hope dashed this way, but them's the breaks.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: UKTruth
Why do you consider her claims back then as 'not credible'... yet consider her claims now as obvious truth?
What possible motive does she have to publicly state she was lying? Other than toeing the line.
She isn't making a claim now. She is admitting her previous claim was false.
She got what she wanted - no need to continue the lie and face questioning from those on a witch hunt in Washington.
originally posted by: Extorris
a reply to: Krakatoa
She said in the interview that she was told by Russian Agents that took her in to custody after landing that if she spoke of Deripaska or Trump again she would spend the rest of her life in prison or worse.
That is just the facts. Would you like audio, video or transcripts or both?
www.cnn.com...
originally posted by: Extorris
a reply to: Krakatoa
Catch up
Leaked tapes allege Russian oligarch planned arrest of escort claiming she had dirt on Trump
www.foxnews.com...
Leaked audio records allegedly show how Oleg Deripaska's associates plotted the arrest of the ‘sex trainers’ who claimed to have ‘RussiaGate’ dirt on him
Link
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Extorris
"Alledged tapes" doesn't equal to proof, more so when she was released from the Thai prison and she hasn't provided the "proof" she claimed to have. Instead she is admitting she made it up.
It is possible she had some dirt of some Russian oligarchs," but that doesn't equal to "Trump Russian collusion..."