Virginia Democrat Pushes Bill That Would Allow Abortion Up To The Moment Of Birth

Yeah, I don't know what to say other than "expected". Our nation has steadily fallen year by year into the abyss. Nothing immoral being celebrated and pushed on the public surprises me anymore.

Why do we even stop here? What is next, killing your baby up to a year after birth? How about just selling your live baby for tissue and organ donations?

Sure, it is just a cluster of cells right?

hotair.com...

Under questioning by Republican Delegate Todd Gilbert, Tran revealed that her bill would not limit abortion even after the point of viability, where the child could survive on his or her own. In fact, she said her bill would potentially allow a woman to seek an abortion as she was in the process of giving birth.

Gilbert went on to press Tran about the requirements for a physician to determine that a woman’s mental health dictated that a woman could receive an abortion for a viable baby in the 3rd trimester. Tran admitted that the physician would not need any special training to make this determination. In effect, it’s a catch-all that means any woman demanding a viable baby be aborted rather than born can legally do so.

Perhaps four hundred years like the Hebrews endured would humble us. We will bring wrath upon our selves.

Now they want a death penalty before somebody even commits a crime 😎

filthy hypocrites !!

This is disgusting.

Absolutely disgusting.

a reply to: infolurker

Fetus is not a baby. However, if the fetus can live and breath on its own you make good point that it is immoral. If the fetus cannot live on its own without the umbilical cord then who are we to decide what a woman does with her body? Where does a woman's rights over how her body is used end? Are you next going to outlaw the removal of cancer because you think it is immoral to kill large masses of living cells? Where does your side of the restrictions end? What about all the sperm that dies as a result of men masturbating? Should there be laws against killing sperm?

But as I said, late term is an issue because a fetus that can live without an umbilical cord is really a baby.

a reply to: infolurker

Edit: saw the video below. You know what happens to BJ sperm? Part of it swims to womans brain, and that stuff remains there for the rest of her life. This Democrat has no place left up there for brains. She’s just a cookie jar.

These people think they are your moral superiors.

Our forefathers would not have allowed this lady to leave that meeting alive.

dumb-bells keep forgetting most aborted fetuses are future democrats 😎

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: infolurker

Fetus is not a baby. However, if the fetus can live and breath on its own you make good point that it is immoral. If the fetus cannot live on its own without the umbilical cord then who are we to decide what a woman does with her body? Where does a woman's rights over how her body is used end? Are you next going to outlaw the removal of cancer because you think it is immoral to kill large masses of living cells? Where does your side of the restrictions end? What about all the sperm that dies as a result of men masturbating? Should there be laws against killing sperm?

But as I said, late term is an issue because a fetus that can live without an umbilical cord is really a baby.

Dude, from one far left progressive to another I gotta say, how much more pot do you cram in than usual to come up with stuff like this?
I mean, is cancer going to grow into a kid that wants to learn about life? No. Is your pile of sperm that you discard every night going to turn into a kid that wants to go outside and play? No, but a fetus would. What an asshat you try to be and end up being sometimes.

Like New York, they'll encourage moms in minority communities to murder, instead of giving birth.

Planned Parenthood New York As of 1/20/2019: "Take a full 8.5 months to decide, if you want to. In the meantime, we'll educate you on how expensive little babies are."

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: infolurker

Fetus is not a baby. However, if the fetus can live and breath on its own you make good point that it is immoral. If the fetus cannot live on its own without the umbilical cord then who are we to decide what a woman does with her body? Where does a woman's rights over how her body is used end? Are you next going to outlaw the removal of cancer because you think it is immoral to kill large masses of living cells? Where does your side of the restrictions end? What about all the sperm that dies as a result of men masturbating? Should there be laws against killing sperm?

But as I said, late term is an issue because a fetus that can live without an umbilical cord is really a baby.

Dude, from one far left progressive to another I gotta say, how much more pot do you cram in than usual to come up with stuff like this?
I mean, is cancer going to grow into a kid that wants to learn about life? No. Is your pile of sperm that you discard every night going to turn into a kid that wants to go outside and play? No, but a fetus would. What an asshat you try to be and end up being sometimes.

Life doesn't begin at conception. Life existed long before conception. Life continues after abortions.

You are not a left progressive. Look, as a far right conservative I just have say no to having more BIG government involved in our lives with more rules on how we are supposed to behave.

I posted about this here in the thread about the NY bill: www.abovetopsecret.com...

It is unfathomable to me what is happening here. When questioned, she seemed almost uncomfortable in her admission, but, she finally had to admit what was in the bill allowed for abortion even when the mother is dilating. This needs to be nipped in the bud now.

To call this disgusting would be a true understatement.

originally posted by: xuenchen
dumb-bells keep forgetting most aborted fetuses are future democrats 😎

Best answer.


Ok , they are not worried about US citizens
This may be a push to rid themselves of US Democratic citizen voters (they may swing vote. And have in the past)
Now , illegal aliens voting are mostly from Catholic countries . Catholics do not believe in abortions. It is forbidden as a sin .
You see the plan ?

In my liberal dystopian caliphate..

..abortions are conducted on infidel slave wives with half breeds in their womb immediately after birth. The newborn is held in the air by the surgeon imam, he sentences it to death, and saws the head off right there.

If the baby can live outside the mother then it is murder.

The only acceptable abortion at the late stage is if for whatever reason the mother's life would be severely threatened by giving birth, or if the kid has no heart or something. That happens occasionally.

originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: infolurker

What about all the sperm that dies as a result of men masturbating?

Asinine post.
What of all the menstrual cycles resulting in women's periods?

Seriously. Let's keep to reality rather than hyperbole.

Edit to topic:
My understanding of abortion laws are: The current national (USA) laws take into account what is best for mother and (future) baby.
I see no reason to amend that. With the exception of extenuation circumstances.

originally posted by: Ohanka
If the baby can live outside the mother then it is murder.

The only acceptable abortion at the late stage is if for whatever reason the mother's life would be severely threatened by giving birth, or if the kid has no heart or something. That happens occasionally.

If the umbilical cord is still attached it's not breathing air yet.

originally posted by: r0xor

originally posted by: Ohanka
If the baby can live outside the mother then it is murder.

The only acceptable abortion at the late stage is if for whatever reason the mother's life would be severely threatened by giving birth, or if the kid has no heart or something. That happens occasionally.

If the umbilical cord is still attached it's not breathing air yet.

murder by technicality - cream dream of every democrat 😎