Query: If Trump Commits Troops to Venezuela Will You Support Him?

a reply to: YouSir

I've heard some news from Colombia that Venezuela is supporting the FARC.

So Maduro is supporting terrorists. He needs to go.

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Yes. The people need to be liberated.

Well then the last thing they need is us there..... Our track record isn't so hot since WWII (with the exception of the Gulf War).

Time to turn this franchise around, start a winning tradition.

Sometimes it's better to take the bench after a few strike outs.

Maybe we have a few decades of letting people handle their own affairs.

Would you say the same of a man beating a woman? Or would you step in?

Comparison is not even in the same ballpark, or even planet.

Fred..

We will see if this is the direction the u.s. wants to go I. When CNN and FOX news both start beating their war drums like they did for iraq.

U.S. propaganda has already painted an initial picture of Venezuela for most naive Americans who watch the MSM which rarely ever paints a full picture.

U.S. mainstream media has already failed terribly at reporting on Venezuela.

Showing all sides of an issue is bad for war..

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Nope.

Venezuela has a ton of it's own problems. They aren't ours. There's no reason for us to invade. Absolutely 0

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Xcalibur254


Actual question to ask: Is Venezuela on top of our oil?

Answer: Yes.

Solution: Send in the Recon Rangers.

Dude they’re all awol and there aren’t enough high level refrigerators in country to justify sending the elite of the elite.

No need to send troops in.
Just Nuke'em - take out a couple of cities and then force them to give up their oil.
Then build a wall and roof around their country, with viewing windows to watch the entertainment as they started killing and eating each other.
Think about it - if there were enough cameras, just think of the TV audience as the live action unfolded.
Awesome!

originally posted by: Indigent
a reply to: YouSir

Ummm...why on earth would President Trump commit troops to Venezuela...?

There is a chance this may happen, Trump recognized Guiado as president, Maduro broke diplomatic relations over this and gave 72 hours for all US personal to leave the country, as US recognize the other guy as president Maduros order is void and the state department already said the staff will remain in Venezuela.

If Maduro tries to enter the embassy to remove the personal this would constitute casus belli and USA would have the right to invade.

Ummm...now...this has me wondering...

This scenario is a perfect set up move...Maduro does the stupid...attempts to eject by force US citizens...the US moves in to liberate them...and by extension...the Venezuelan people...

This also puts a damper on the cozying up to Russia and China...ands leads to the possible expulsion from Venezuela of their assets and influence from Venezuelan territory...

Which would be the real goal of such a move...with liberating the people a secondary objective...





YouSir

a reply to: grey580
They've been doing it for years. FARC are communists, so Chavez/Maduro have supported them against the capitalist Colombian government.

I say no to sending troops into Venezuela.

One of the few reasons I take the abuse and support this President is for his non - interventionist policies.

I was not in favor of the times he bombed Syria. He lost points for that.

Stay out of it, except in a humanitarian or logistical way.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: YouSir

I've heard some news from Colombia that Venezuela is supporting the FARC.

So Maduro is supporting terrorists. He needs to go.

Ummm...I’ve heard the same...and I agree...Maduro needs to go...

The devil truly lives in the details of how to go about engineering his exodus...and doing it in a palatable enough way that satisfies and saves South American face...and bolsters South and North America’s strategic and economic interests...they need a hand in this...a major hand...





YouSir

originally posted by: fredrodgers1960

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Yes. The people need to be liberated.

Well then the last thing they need is us there..... Our track record isn't so hot since WWII (with the exception of the Gulf War).

Time to turn this franchise around, start a winning tradition.

Sometimes it's better to take the bench after a few strike outs.

Maybe we have a few decades of letting people handle their own affairs.

Would you say the same of a man beating a woman? Or would you step in?

Comparison is not even in the same ballpark, or even planet.

Fred..

It wasn’t a comparison. It was an analogy, Fred.

The point is, how long do you let evil continue before you step in to stop it?

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Yes. The people need to be liberated.

Well then the last thing they need is us there..... Our track record isn't so hot since WWII (with the exception of the Gulf War).

Time to turn this franchise around, start a winning tradition.

Sometimes it's better to take the bench after a few strike outs.

Maybe we have a few decades of letting people handle their own affairs.

Would you say the same of a man beating a woman? Or would you step in?

Hmmmm, I'd step in.... But that decision probably wouldn't result in the death of a quarter of a million civilians like our Middle East efforts post 9/11. In your defense, those people are in fact free now, free from this earth.

But hey, when you fall off the war horse, just get back on and try again, what's the worse that could happen, ammirite?

The worst that could happen is you do nothing because you have an active imagination.

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Yes. The people need to be liberated.

Well then the last thing they need is us there..... Our track record isn't so hot since WWII (with the exception of the Gulf War).

Time to turn this franchise around, start a winning tradition.

Sometimes it's better to take the bench after a few strike outs.

Maybe we have a few decades of letting people handle their own affairs.

Would you say the same of a man beating a woman? Or would you step in?

Hmmmm, I'd step in.... But that decision probably wouldn't result in the death of a quarter of a million civilians like our Middle East efforts post 9/11. In your defense, those people are in fact free now, free from this earth.

But hey, when you fall off the war horse, just get back on and try again, what's the worse that could happen, ammirite?

The worst that could happen is you do nothing because you have an active imagination.

So I imagined us f###ing up places worse than before we were there?

Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya.

I feel like you have an active selective memory.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Yes. The people need to be liberated.

Well then the last thing they need is us there..... Our track record isn't so hot since WWII (with the exception of the Gulf War).

Time to turn this franchise around, start a winning tradition.

Sometimes it's better to take the bench after a few strike outs.

Maybe we have a few decades of letting people handle their own affairs.

Would you say the same of a man beating a woman? Or would you step in?

Hmmmm, I'd step in.... But that decision probably wouldn't result in the death of a quarter of a million civilians like our Middle East efforts post 9/11. In your defense, those people are in fact free now, free from this earth.

But hey, when you fall off the war horse, just get back on and try again, what's the worse that could happen, ammirite?

The worst that could happen is you do nothing because you have an active imagination.

So I imagined us f###ing up places worse than before we were there?

Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya.

I feel like you have an active selective memory.

I thought we were talking about Venezuela.

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Yes. The people need to be liberated.

Well then the last thing they need is us there..... Our track record isn't so hot since WWII (with the exception of the Gulf War).

Time to turn this franchise around, start a winning tradition.

Sometimes it's better to take the bench after a few strike outs.

Maybe we have a few decades of letting people handle their own affairs.

Would you say the same of a man beating a woman? Or would you step in?

Hmmmm, I'd step in.... But that decision probably wouldn't result in the death of a quarter of a million civilians like our Middle East efforts post 9/11. In your defense, those people are in fact free now, free from this earth.

But hey, when you fall off the war horse, just get back on and try again, what's the worse that could happen, ammirite?

The worst that could happen is you do nothing because you have an active imagination.

So I imagined us f###ing up places worse than before we were there?

Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya.

I feel like you have an active selective memory.

I thought we were talking about Venezuela.

Sorry, I thought we were talking about a dude beating his girl.

originally posted by: toolgal462
I say no to sending troops into Venezuela.

One of the few reasons I take the abuse and support this President is for his non - interventionist policies.

I was not in favor of the times he bombed Syria. He lost points for that.

Stay out of it, except in a humanitarian or logistical way.

Ummm...I totally agree...and for the very same reasons...

The stinking red herring in this whole mess...is the humanitarian reasons...as someone else stated...the zoo animals have already been eaten...they have nothing left but one another...

And the simple minded in this country are flocking to emulate such wonderful socialist idealism...like moths to the flame...

All while this Venezuelan socialist nightmare implodes before their glazed eyes...

Things that make you go...hmmm...





YouSir

we don't really need oil anymore, we get more than 90% of our oil from the US, Canada and Mexico, so i don't know why people keep perpetuating that oil nonsense,maybe if this was ten or twenty years ago that might be valid reasoning.

i don't see military action by the US but their neighbors might decide to do something if maduro doesn't step down peacefully, Brazil is just itching for a fight from what I've seen, they learned the hard way what socialism does to a nation and don't want such a neighbor that might spread it back to them. not only that but with all the venezuelan immigration going on it is creating anger among the brazilian population, to the point of attacking immigration border camps.

Brazil is ripe for conflict and it's only getting worse with all that is going on there and Venezuela is the perfect scapegoat.

this won't be America's war.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Xcalibur254


Actual question to ask: Is Venezuela on top of our oil?

Answer: Yes.

Solution: Send in the Recon Rangers.

It is how ATS degraded and reduced to trolls domain, what an arrogant comments…!

Yours what…?

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Yes. The people need to be liberated.

Well then the last thing they need is us there..... Our track record isn't so hot since WWII (with the exception of the Gulf War).

Time to turn this franchise around, start a winning tradition.

Sometimes it's better to take the bench after a few strike outs.

Maybe we have a few decades of letting people handle their own affairs.

Would you say the same of a man beating a woman? Or would you step in?

Hmmmm, I'd step in.... But that decision probably wouldn't result in the death of a quarter of a million civilians like our Middle East efforts post 9/11. In your defense, those people are in fact free now, free from this earth.

But hey, when you fall off the war horse, just get back on and try again, what's the worse that could happen, ammirite?

The worst that could happen is you do nothing because you have an active imagination.

So I imagined us f###ing up places worse than before we were there?

Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya.

I feel like you have an active selective memory.

I thought we were talking about Venezuela.

Sorry, I thought we were talking about a dude beating his girl.

Let them sort it out.

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Yes. The people need to be liberated.

Well then the last thing they need is us there..... Our track record isn't so hot since WWII (with the exception of the Gulf War).

Time to turn this franchise around, start a winning tradition.

Sometimes it's better to take the bench after a few strike outs.

Maybe we have a few decades of letting people handle their own affairs.

Would you say the same of a man beating a woman? Or would you step in?

Hmmmm, I'd step in.... But that decision probably wouldn't result in the death of a quarter of a million civilians like our Middle East efforts post 9/11. In your defense, those people are in fact free now, free from this earth.

But hey, when you fall off the war horse, just get back on and try again, what's the worse that could happen, ammirite?

The worst that could happen is you do nothing because you have an active imagination.

So I imagined us f###ing up places worse than before we were there?

Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya.

I feel like you have an active selective memory.

I thought we were talking about Venezuela.

Sorry, I thought we were talking about a dude beating his girl.

Let them sort it out.

^^^ Things to say about Venezuela.