Trump told to ‘resign or be impeached’

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan


cohen was not one of the sources.

That's right, he isn't. It's 2 anonymous sources, telling us what they claim Cohen said, about what he claims Trump said to him.

Cohen's attorney refused to comment on this story. Given that the guy is a full-blown Democratic attack dog, who insinuates all sorts of ills against Trump at every opportunity, I wonder if this means he knows it's fake news.

a reply to: LSU2018

Mueller's investigation has not even been going on for two years (May 17,2017). Watergate June 17, 1972. Nixon resign August 9, 1974.

Give it time.

originally posted by: ketsuko
Don't forget that BuzzFeed also was the only media source that would run with the dossier too that led to the Mueller witchhunt.

Don't tell me that they're no trying the same old tactic with more unnamed, unsubstantiated stuff to try to kick that can down the road some more and keep this show going?

That fact was not lost on those who have been paying attention.
Interesting how fast "everyone else" in the msm jumped on this to report it without any verification.

I pray to God this Mueller report comes out ASAP so we can cut the crap and agree that the previous administration was trying to steal the election from Trump "by all means necessary". Y'all should know that when we had the Kavanaugh BS.

The Russian hoax is the insurance policy Strzok and Page were talking about, and if you don't see that it's only because you're biased to your party.

Now that the Russian hoax is coming to an end, the left MSM is on full train desperate mode!!

Expect lots of these stories from "unnamed sources" and "officers familiar with the matter" that'll led nowhere.

Just trying to influence the public opinion with headlines, and hey, it's working!!

a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey

How hard is it to show evidence of something you claimed you had 2 years ago?

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: FilthyUSMonkey

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey


I'm obviously not a Trump fan but I need more evidence than two unnamed sources. Also, if it comes down to Cohen versus Trump it's all a he said/he said scenario.

But if Cohen actually has this on tape it's a whole different situation.

”Sources said the investigation had been able to corroborate Cohen’s assertions using interviews with additional witnesses from inside the Trump Organization, as well as information in internal emails, text messages and other documents.

Are you still not tired of all the BS pushed in weak and feeble attempts to end Trump's presidency? I mean, seriously bub, if they can't find anything after more than 2 years of investigations in the 21st Century, the age of technology, do you really think there's something there?

Maybe it's more prudent to exhaust all the cards instead of going with the first winning hand.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

And if they do not have the proof and go for it anyways, would you (as a self-proclaimed defender of democracy) consider it a coup attempt?

Trump has been told to "resign or be impeached" since the day after he won an election he was never supposed to win.

Which, obviously, doesn't seem questionable in any way.

originally posted by: Ahabstar
And if they do not have the proof and go for it anyways, would you (as a self-proclaimed defender of democracy) consider it a coup attempt?

When you say 'go for it' are you referring to impeachment? No, I wouldn't, since it requires a super majority of the Congress and they would need to be operating within the dictums of the Constitution. But I frankly don't think the Republicans would do that without proof, it makes zero sense for them to do so.

This is some crazy dramatics going on here folks. Does anyone else see the disconcerting Anglo-American pattern which is unfolding right now, at this very moment?

We have a long-running saga of deeply polarising issues affecting both the USA (divided over Trump presidency) & the UK (divided over the exit from the European Union).

These issues are really basic, fundamental issues of binary division.

Never in living memory has anything of such great consequence unfolded to so massively disrupt the USA-UK 'special relationship' mini-'bloc' of two of the greatest powers on Earth at this time.

Serious aggression is being leveled at both powers; sure, it appears to be two totally separate & unrelated matters, on the face of things. But there;s been such a frenzy of manipulation, disinformation, threats of legislative disruption, mismanagement, personal illegalities & character assassinations. We are poised on the edge of a chasm, and we don't realise that we all, apparently, are being shunted off the edge, in a coordinated manner.

At least that's how it seems.

I have come to recognise that there are a very few HUGELY influential families/dynasties working hand-in-glove to manipulate events on a world scale, for the purposes of maintaining the status quo of personal enrichment & amassed powers which can be exerted according to the whims & foibles of those families. Does it seem to you that there might be a hidden war going on behind the scenes which extends far beyond the boundaries of the 'deep state' of the USA..?

Only today, we hear news that the Duke of Edinburgh, the Queen of Great Britain's husband, was involved in what could have proven to be an horrific & multiple-fatality car crash at high speed here in the UK. Only recently a helicopter came down over the Rothschilds estate here in the UK. A hundred other 'weird events' could be listed here too. It may seem that these events & trends of strangeness are unconnected from the power struggles going on between the overt powers - or it could be the hallmark of a very deliberate campaign being waged between the covert powers. Again, today, we have the British foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, former mayor of London & one of the original ministers in charge of Brexit, declaring openly at a live press conference that there exists an 'elitist conspiracy' unfolding here in the UK for the purposes of damaging the nation in deep & fundamental ways, seeking to frustrate & damage the withdrawal process & the negotiations with all powers concerned.

An 'elitist conspiracy'...? Since when does the UK Foreign Secretary suddenly announce such a shocking and brazen accusation/ bombshell/ seemingly irrational covert declaration of war, when to say such a thing is automatically & intrinsically damaging to the appearance, status, wealth & diplomatic influence as regards the UK's presence & influence on the world stage?

Things are seriously messed up, and I think all we can see is the surface manifestations of a very, very deep & potentially deadly feud between the trillionaires. 'Interesting times'.

a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey



"Not accepting our election results, is a threat to our democracy."

]]]]]

At least that was the talking point by the Progressives UNTIL they lost the election...

If they could impeach President Trump, they would have by now;

The Constitution requires a two-thirds super majority to convict a person being impeached, whereupon the Constitutional Court decides whether the President is guilty of the crime of which he is charged.

history.house.gov...


Don't forget, impeachment does not always mean removal from office. Clinton was impeached and he finished as the sitting President.

www.congress.gov...


So all you snowflake leftist commie socialist punks, do some research and home work.
Think for yourselves and stop takin the msm word for it on everything.

I'm not asking you to believe me either, over any one else. I am asking that those of you who knee jerk react to everything, to think for yourselves.

This cookie cutter society bs is a scam.
We are individuals for a reason, we are supposed to be different.

a reply to: seeker1963

They are all hypocrites, if it wasn't for double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all.

a reply to: ADVISOR


time will tell.

if this story turns out to be true and there are tapes to prove it do you think it's an impeachable offense?

a reply to: knoxie

What offense?

originally posted by: ketsuko
Don't forget that BuzzFeed also was the only media source that would run with the dossier too that led to the Mueller witchhunt.

Don't tell me that they're no trying the same old tactic with more unnamed, unsubstantiated stuff to try to kick that can down the road some more and keep this show going?

Same Buzzfeed that is sueing the DNC over that same dossier because they were sued in turn by a Russian national for libel? I am wiling to believe that the DNC is balking at the discovery process since I haven't seen much more about that "little" problem in the narrative for a bit.

thehill.com...

Amazing that Buzzfeed still carries on with this even as they sue someone for practically the same thing to cover their own asses.

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: knoxie

What offense?

Obstruction of justice, tampering with a witness - just for starters.

a reply to: ADVISOR


if trump told cohen to lie to congress would that be an impeachable offense to you?

I said "IF", humor me.

Another anti-Trump wet dream scenario that will lead to nothing but a wet stain in their underpants.

I think the results of all the investigation must be weak.

The antis are putting more effort on the public than on trump, habituating the populace to the idea that Trump MUST be guilty of something.

Because when their impeachment trial goes to the senate, you're going to need more than half the senate to vote against thier own party (R), and every democrat to vote against trump--- some of those democrats come from districts that trump carried by 15 or 20 points. Trump carried 41 states. The senate will be telling 41 states that they are idiots....

And if the senate finds DJ Trump not guilty....

That's the crest of the mountain, isn't it? And if the never DJTrumpers cannot get this snowball over the mountain, it's going to roll right back down the mountain, picking up mass and speed until it crushes their tiny Democrat village at the bottom of the valley.

And If DJ Trump is cleared by a Senate trial, he will be the big swinging d**k in Washington for the rest of his life, just like Bill Clinton has been. He will get the wall, the Muslim countries travel ban, and anything else he ever mentioned on the campaign trail. Probably Hillary in chains.

Once Pelosi lets that impeachment vote happen in the house (and you can only fire THAT cannon once), the democrat party will be "all in." They'd better not be bluffing about their straight flush, and they'd better pray to God that DJ Trump is not holding 4 of a kind.