Well there is no color filter on my computer and a lot of idiots seem to be in the sandbox right now.
Jeepers creepers....lets all marten up already....what the man means is that learning methods are racially catalysed supported and propagated....they
are ingrained....they are connected inextricably to our cultural climate.
When you remove culture and spirituality from a people you remove the conduits to path of least resistance learning.....you DISENFRANCHISE THE
I have met idiots of every racial profle.....I have met smarty pants of every racial profile.
Its all about location and path of least resistance learning.
Cultural integration and cultural symbiosis are NOT RELATIVE TO INETELLECT POTENTIALS...they ARE relative to availble learning dynamics......which by
proxy are relative to the ability to express learning potentials.....so you see it is easy to DISENFRANCHISE a CULTURE and inhibit its ability to
learn by fracturing its cultural core values and then claim upon ATTEMPTED INTEGRATION SOCIALLY AND CULTURALLY INTO THE CONQUORING CULTURE that these
people are slow learners or are unable by nature to learn at speeds and volumes as those in the adopted or new culture.....this shift must be a slow
seamless one....and it takes generations to eliminate a culture.
This man came from a time when all information he was given in his teachings was bastardised in one form or another by the Privately owned publishing
companies who control the publication nd distribition of peer approved papers.
Yes....his technical statistical models will prove out his statement...but they are flawed by proxy of his bastardised education.
Using my methods and models you can replicate his statistical numbers using any color interchangably as the baseline quotient....and reproduce the
numbers that will prove to a per his rationale that each of those colors will replicate the African curve.
Anybody else get that?
As an aside,I once worked in the North American Oilfields on Drilling Rigs.....99% of the men and women I worked with were whiteish or redish....or
some mix there-of......I distinctly remember working with a African man.....one....of 4 over a decade...and we were same minded....within days he was
calling me a nickname...PROFESSOR....and I was calling him HANDY........no one else could connect or figure out what we were talking about or how we
had developed these icknames because nicknames are generally a group thing....well it was because we BOTH SAW EVERYTHING AROUND US THE SAME WAYS...we
looked different we spoke different we dressed different and we ate different foods...but we ABSORBED DATA AND PROBLEM SOLVED THE SAME WAYS..... we
made nicknames for each other because so many times on the job both of us would show up at the scene of a problem or issue needing to be solved and we
would always sit in the weeds and observe and internally problem solve...wait till the correct time...then step in and SOLVE THE PROBLEM.....because
we BOTH knew that we had to recruit a specific % of the current present status qou opinion to even have a chance to solve anything(the politics of
production....lol...)....of course we immediatly noticed each other....he was CLEARLY smarter than everyone else...so I thought then.... today I know
we simply had the same type of Teacher....I was vain and we both simply had different data assimilation and projection techniques than everyone else
had been given to work with.
Neither Handy nor the Professor held high ranking positions....both specificlly sat in the weeds....and both solved a disproportionately HIGH VOLUME
of group problems....to the point they were counted on to do so.
Yes....the black man and the white man were same-minded...different countries of origin different cultures...but similar teachers.....and we both used
our ability to UNDERSTAND EVERYONE ELSES PERSPECTIVE and their methods of thinking with equality and respect....that way we never missed anything
relevant or important....everyone was equal and everyone had something to ADD to the solution....but in most cases only two of us viewed everyone as
equal enough to be able to expeditiously put together everyones data and solve the problem...we deleted the biases that most cannot overcome...we were
the TROUBLE SHOOTERS.
Statistics and numbers are misdirectng by proxy and can be manipulated and managed to send different messages .
Like I said this guy made a statement based on stats he observed...but the methodology(path of most resistance) used to produce those stats unduly
influenced the net end result...so his findings are flawed by proxy....however if you challenge him in a Court of Law he would win based upon a status
qou endorsed and accepted peer approved methods he employed.
edit on 13-1-2019 by one4all because: (no reason given)