It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Propagandalf
If anyone set eyes on the liberal media complex last night, everyone from Colbert to Don Lemon was churning out the new talking points about Iowa Rep. Steve King. This appeared to stem, as it often does, from a NYT hit piece, which invariably told us about the controversial things he said over the decades, but not much else.
It was, as the title suggested from the outset, an article that painted Steve King as a racist, white nationalist, anti-immigrant xenophobe, all of the evidence being derived from disparate phrases said over the course of a decade.
This statement of King’s in particular seized upon Don Lemon’s cerebral cortex, sending him in to fits of fury:
“White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” Mr. King said. “Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?”
According to King, this one sentence was plucked from a 50 minute interview and used in such a way—as these things often are—to paint him in a certain light of the author’s (and therefor, Don Lemon’s) desire.
But in a public statement, Steve King denies any such sentiment, or the angle of the hit piece in general.
Was Steve King lamenting the loss of White Nationalism, or is he the victim of a word-policing outrage machine?
originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: DBCowboy
I know nothing about the man except what comes from the article. And everything that comes from the article is unflattering to say the least. Has he not said or done a single, unracist thing over the course of his career?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Propagandalf
a reply to: DBCowboy
I know nothing about the man except what comes from the article. And everything that comes from the article is unflattering to say the least. Has he not said or done a single, unracist thing over the course of his career?
It doesn't even matter what he said.
It's only how it is interpreted by the Thought Police.
I mean, seriously, are we going to do a purge of everyone who has ever said something or even thought something against the current fascist ideology?
originally posted by: TheRedneck
I don't believe it. Every time I hear someone use the word "racist" my brain just shuts down and nothing else they say means squat.
I do believe that every time a Democrat says the word "racist," a Republican is born...
TheRedneck
Agree. Dumb things to say in public 101.
originally posted by: Grambler
If he said what was alleged, that is a really dumb terribel thing to say, and I dont blame media for calling him out on it.
However, notice that the media seems to not want to cal people out for supporting racist like farrakhan in washington.
Wiki
Nationalism is a political, social, and economic ideology and movement characterized by the promotion of the interests of a particular nation,[1] especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty (self-governance) over its homeland.
wiki YOu open a can of worms that I want nothing to do with.
hold that white people should maintain their majority in majority-white countries, maintain their political and economic dominance, and that their cultures should be foremost.[4] Many white nationalists believe that miscegenation, multiculturalism, immigration of nonwhites and low birth rates among whites are threatening the white race,[6] and some believe these things are being promoted as part of an attempted white genocide.[6]
originally posted by: soundguy
He’s a racist, pure and simple. He has a long history. Of course that probably makes him a hero to many here. a reply to: Propagandalf
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: FilthyUSMonkey
I couldn't agree more.
Does this mean that rep king is a racist?
No.
But it certainly is a legitimate reason for the press to report on those comments and for him to have to explain himself.